Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Quantified Settlement Notes as Accord and Satisfaction of Accrued Claims: Delhi High Court clarifies the reach of Sections 62 and 63 of the Contract Act

Quantified Settlement Notes as Accord and Satisfaction of Accrued Claims: Delhi High Court clarifies the reach of Sections 62 and 63 of the Contract Act

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Quantified Settlement Notes as Accord and Satisfaction of Accrued Claims: Delhi High Court clarifies the reach of Sections 62 and 63 of the Contract Act Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Section 11 Appointments Not Barred by Pending Section 37 Appeals: Bombay High Court Orders De Novo Arbitration After Set-Aside, Confines Referral Court to Prima Facie Existence of Agreement

Section 11 Appointments Not Barred by Pending Section 37 Appeals: Bombay High Court Orders De Novo Arbitration After Set-Aside, Confines Referral Court to Prima Facie Existence of Agreement

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Section 11 Appointments Not Barred by Pending Section 37 Appeals: Bombay High Court Orders De Novo Arbitration After Set-Aside, Confines Referral Court to Prima Facie Existence of Agreement...
Victim’s Age under POCSO Must Be Determined via JJ Act Section 94(2); Section 34 POCSO Confined to Juvenile‑Accused: Commentary on Murugesan @ Murugesh v. State (Madras High Court, 10 Oct 2025)

Victim’s Age under POCSO Must Be Determined via JJ Act Section 94(2); Section 34 POCSO Confined to Juvenile‑Accused: Commentary on Murugesan @ Murugesh v. State (Madras High Court, 10 Oct 2025)

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Victim’s Age under POCSO Must Be Determined via JJ Act Section 94(2); Section 34 POCSO Confined to Juvenile‑Accused: Commentary on Murugesan @ Murugesh v. State Citation: 2025 MHC 2357 | Court:...
GST Returns Are Confidential: Bombay High Court Holds Section 158 of the GST Act Overrides RTI Requests for Third-Party Tax Records; Section 11 Notice Mandatory

GST Returns Are Confidential: Bombay High Court Holds Section 158 of the GST Act Overrides RTI Requests for Third-Party Tax Records; Section 11 Notice Mandatory

Date: Oct 16, 2025
GST Returns Are Confidential: Section 158 of the GST Act Overrides RTI Requests for Third-Party Tax Records; Section 11 Notice Mandatory Introduction In Writ Petition No. 11135 of 2025, decided on 14...
Holiday-Extension for Quarry Lease Renewals under KMMC Rules: Karnataka High Court harmonizes Rule 21(2) with Sections 9 and 10 of the General Clauses Act and reaffirms communication-based limitation for revisions

Holiday-Extension for Quarry Lease Renewals under KMMC Rules: Karnataka High Court harmonizes Rule 21(2) with Sections 9 and 10 of the General Clauses Act and reaffirms communication-based limitation for revisions

Date: Oct 15, 2025
Holiday-Extension for Quarry Lease Renewals under KMMC Rules: Karnataka High Court harmonizes Rule 21(2) with Sections 9 and 10 of the General Clauses Act and reaffirms communication-based limitation...
Zero‑Tolerance Protocol for Impersonated NGO Writs: Delhi High Court Orders Police Probe and Personal Costs for Fraud on the Court

Zero‑Tolerance Protocol for Impersonated NGO Writs: Delhi High Court Orders Police Probe and Personal Costs for Fraud on the Court

Date: Oct 15, 2025
Zero‑Tolerance Protocol for Impersonated NGO Writs: Police Probe and Personal Costs for Fraud on the Court Introduction Case: Delhi Ki Galiyan NGO v. Deputy Commissioner & Ors., W.P.(C) 10595/2024...
Right to Safe Roads under Article 21: Immediate Public-Law Compensation for Pothole and Open Manhole Victims; District Compensation Committees and Personal Liability of Officials — Bombay High Court (13 October 2025)

Right to Safe Roads under Article 21: Immediate Public-Law Compensation for Pothole and Open Manhole Victims; District Compensation Committees and Personal Liability of Officials — Bombay High Court (13 October 2025)

Date: Oct 15, 2025
Right to Safe Roads under Article 21: Immediate Public-Law Compensation for Pothole and Open Manhole Victims; District Compensation Committees and Personal Liability of Officials — Bombay High Court...
Accidental Falls Culminating in Run-Over Remain “Untoward Incidents”: Orissa High Court Reaffirms Strict Liability and Evidentiary Primacy of Police Records over DRM Inquiries under Section 124A

Accidental Falls Culminating in Run-Over Remain “Untoward Incidents”: Orissa High Court Reaffirms Strict Liability and Evidentiary Primacy of Police Records over DRM Inquiries under Section 124A

Date: Oct 13, 2025
Accidental Falls Culminating in Run-Over Remain “Untoward Incidents”: Orissa High Court Reaffirms Strict Liability and Evidentiary Primacy of Police Records over DRM Inquiries under Section 124A...
Six-Year Delay in Written Statement: Counsel’s Lapse Not a Shield; Limited Cross‑Examination Right Preserved

Six-Year Delay in Written Statement: Counsel’s Lapse Not a Shield; Limited Cross‑Examination Right Preserved

Date: Oct 13, 2025
Six-Year Delay in Written Statement: Counsel’s Lapse Not a Shield; Limited Cross‑Examination Right Preserved Introduction In CM(M) 1961/2025 (with CM APPL. 63525/2025 & 63524/2025), the Delhi High...
Dropping an Execution for Want of Particulars Is Impermissible Without First Allowing Rectification: Orissa High Court Reaffirms Order 21 Rule 17 CPC and Clarifies that Technical Disposals Do Not Bar Re‑Execution

Dropping an Execution for Want of Particulars Is Impermissible Without First Allowing Rectification: Orissa High Court Reaffirms Order 21 Rule 17 CPC and Clarifies that Technical Disposals Do Not Bar Re‑Execution

Date: Oct 13, 2025
Dropping an Execution for Want of Particulars Is Impermissible Without First Allowing Rectification: Orissa High Court Reaffirms Order 21 Rule 17 CPC and Clarifies that Technical Disposals Do Not Bar...
No Fundamental Right to a Particular Place of Worship: MP High Court Denies Devotee Locus for Mosque Reconstruction After Lawful Acquisition

No Fundamental Right to a Particular Place of Worship: MP High Court Denies Devotee Locus for Mosque Reconstruction After Lawful Acquisition

Date: Oct 13, 2025
No Fundamental Right to a Particular Place of Worship: MP High Court Denies Devotee Locus for Mosque Reconstruction After Lawful Acquisition Case: Mohammed Taiyab and Others v. State of Madhya...
Directory, Not Mandatory: Bombay High Court Reaffirms Material-Compliance Standard for Co‑operative Housing Redevelopment Under the 2019 GR

Directory, Not Mandatory: Bombay High Court Reaffirms Material-Compliance Standard for Co‑operative Housing Redevelopment Under the 2019 GR

Date: Oct 13, 2025
Directory, Not Mandatory: Bombay High Court Reaffirms Material-Compliance Standard for Co‑operative Housing Redevelopment Under the 2019 GR Introduction This commentary examines the Bombay High...
Non est Charge-Sheets under Rule 14(3) CCS(CCA): Delhi High Court Reaffirms B.V. Gopinath, Rejects Res Judicata and Prospective-Only Arguments

Non est Charge-Sheets under Rule 14(3) CCS(CCA): Delhi High Court Reaffirms B.V. Gopinath, Rejects Res Judicata and Prospective-Only Arguments

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Non est Charge-Sheets under Rule 14(3) CCS(CCA): Delhi High Court Reaffirms B.V. Gopinath, Rejects Res Judicata and Prospective-Only Arguments Case: Union of India through Secretary & Ors. v. Shri S...
Seizure of Digital Devices by Another Agency Negates Need for Custodial Interrogation in Cyber-Obscenity Cases: Ajaz Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Seizure of Digital Devices by Another Agency Negates Need for Custodial Interrogation in Cyber-Obscenity Cases: Ajaz Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Seizure of Digital Devices by Another Agency Negates Need for Custodial Interrogation in Cyber-Obscenity Cases: Delhi High Court’s Anticipatory Bail Ruling in Ajaz Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi) Case:...
Anti‑Profiteering, Not Price Control: Delhi High Court delineates DoE’s limited fee‑regulation power over unaided recognised schools under Sections 17, 18 and 24 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973

Anti‑Profiteering, Not Price Control: Delhi High Court delineates DoE’s limited fee‑regulation power over unaided recognised schools under Sections 17, 18 and 24 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Anti‑Profiteering, Not Price Control: Delhi High Court delineates DoE’s limited fee‑regulation power over unaided recognised schools under Sections 17, 18 and 24 of the Delhi School Education Act,...
Willful Disobedience Threshold in Tax Stay Matters: Briefly Reasoned Reliance on CBDT’s 20% Pre-Deposit Policy Is Not Contempt

Willful Disobedience Threshold in Tax Stay Matters: Briefly Reasoned Reliance on CBDT’s 20% Pre-Deposit Policy Is Not Contempt

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Willful Disobedience Threshold in Tax Stay Matters: Briefly Reasoned Reliance on CBDT’s 20% Pre-Deposit Policy Is Not Contempt Introduction In “Court on its own motion v. Anuradha Misra,” 2025 DHC...
Good‑Faith Shareholder Alerts to Lenders Are Protected; Internal Receipt by Corporate Employees Is Not “Publication” for Defamation: Delhi High Court’s Ritesh Bawri v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Good‑Faith Shareholder Alerts to Lenders Are Protected; Internal Receipt by Corporate Employees Is Not “Publication” for Defamation: Delhi High Court’s Ritesh Bawri v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Good‑Faith Shareholder Alerts to Lenders Are Protected; Internal Receipt by Corporate Employees Is Not “Publication” for Defamation: Delhi High Court’s Ritesh Bawri v. State (NCT of Delhi)...
MP High Court clarifies: No automatic forfeiture of gratuity for dismissed bank officers; Payment of Gratuity Act overrides service regulations; conviction required for ‘moral turpitude’ forfeiture

MP High Court clarifies: No automatic forfeiture of gratuity for dismissed bank officers; Payment of Gratuity Act overrides service regulations; conviction required for ‘moral turpitude’ forfeiture

Date: Oct 10, 2025
MP High Court clarifies: No automatic forfeiture of gratuity for dismissed bank officers; Payment of Gratuity Act overrides service regulations; conviction required for ‘moral turpitude’ forfeiture...
No Equity in Illegality: Bombay High Court Cancels Ineligible ANM/GNM Admissions, Orders Refunds, Rs.1 Lakh Compensation, and Five-Year Compliance Audit

No Equity in Illegality: Bombay High Court Cancels Ineligible ANM/GNM Admissions, Orders Refunds, Rs.1 Lakh Compensation, and Five-Year Compliance Audit

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Equity in Illegality: Bombay High Court Cancels Ineligible ANM/GNM Admissions, Orders Refunds, Rs.1 Lakh Compensation, and Five-Year Compliance Audit Court: Bombay High Court (Civil Appellate...
Rebuttable Notice from Registration and Mixed-Question Limitation: AP High Court Restricts Pre‑Registration Rejection under Order VII Rule 11 and Directs Court‑Fee Refund

Rebuttable Notice from Registration and Mixed-Question Limitation: AP High Court Restricts Pre‑Registration Rejection under Order VII Rule 11 and Directs Court‑Fee Refund

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Rebuttable Notice from Registration and Mixed-Question Limitation: AP High Court Restricts Pre‑Registration Rejection under Order VII Rule 11 and Directs Court‑Fee Refund Introduction In A.S. No. 409...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert