Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Undue Delay That Taints and “Unworkable” Arbitral Awards: Supreme Court’s Test and Article 142 Cure in Lancor Holdings Ltd. v. Prem Kumar Menon (2025 INSC 1277)

Undue Delay That Taints and “Unworkable” Arbitral Awards: Supreme Court’s Test and Article 142 Cure in Lancor Holdings Ltd. v. Prem Kumar Menon (2025 INSC 1277)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Undue Delay That Taints and “Unworkable” Arbitral Awards: Supreme Court’s Test and Article 142 Cure in Lancor Holdings Ltd. v. Prem Kumar Menon (2025 INSC 1277) Introduction This decision of the...
No Direct Police Summons to Advocates Absent Section 132 Exceptions: Supreme Court fortifies Advocate–Client Privilege, mandates SP-level approval, judicial review, and protocols for documents and digital devices

No Direct Police Summons to Advocates Absent Section 132 Exceptions: Supreme Court fortifies Advocate–Client Privilege, mandates SP-level approval, judicial review, and protocols for documents and digital devices

Date: Oct 31, 2025
No Direct Police Summons to Advocates Absent Section 132 Exceptions: Supreme Court fortifies Advocate–Client Privilege, mandates SP-level approval, judicial review, and protocols for documents and...
Case-by-case de‑sealing and the LSC classification clarified: Upper floors in shop‑cum‑residence Local Shopping Centres require statutory conversion for commercial use

Case-by-case de‑sealing and the LSC classification clarified: Upper floors in shop‑cum‑residence Local Shopping Centres require statutory conversion for commercial use

Date: Oct 31, 2025
Case-by-case de‑sealing and the LSC classification clarified: Upper floors in shop‑cum‑residence Local Shopping Centres require statutory conversion for commercial use Introduction This order in M.C....
Cause of Fire Is Immaterial Absent Insured’s Instigation; “FFF” Means Furniture, Fixtures and Fittings; Business Records Suffice to Prove Stock Loss — Commentary on Orion Conmerx Pvt. Ltd. v. National Insurance Co. Ltd., 2025 INSC 1271

Cause of Fire Is Immaterial Absent Insured’s Instigation; “FFF” Means Furniture, Fixtures and Fittings; Business Records Suffice to Prove Stock Loss — Commentary on Orion Conmerx Pvt. Ltd. v. National Insurance Co. Ltd., 2025 INSC 1271

Date: Oct 31, 2025
Cause of Fire Is Immaterial Absent Insured’s Instigation; “FFF” Means Furniture, Fixtures and Fittings; Business Records Suffice to Prove Stock Loss Introduction In Orion Conmerx Pvt. Ltd. v....
Unilateral Termination After Waiver Can Be Ignored: Specific Performance Maintainable Without Declaratory Relief; Limits on Second Appeal Interference

Unilateral Termination After Waiver Can Be Ignored: Specific Performance Maintainable Without Declaratory Relief; Limits on Second Appeal Interference

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Unilateral Termination After Waiver Can Be Ignored: Specific Performance Maintainable Without Declaratory Relief; Limits on Second Appeal Interference Introduction In Annamalai v. Vasanthi and...
First Doctor-Certified Dying Declaration Can Solely Sustain Conviction; Multiple Declarations to be Assessed Independently — Supreme Court in Jemaben v. State of Gujarat

First Doctor-Certified Dying Declaration Can Solely Sustain Conviction; Multiple Declarations to be Assessed Independently — Supreme Court in Jemaben v. State of Gujarat

Date: Oct 30, 2025
First Doctor-Certified Dying Declaration Can Solely Sustain Conviction; Multiple Declarations to be Assessed Independently — Supreme Court in Jemaben v. State of Gujarat Introduction In Jemaben v....
Facilitation Equals Participation: Section 149 IPC Liability for Transporting Assailants and Immobilizing Victims; Appellate Reversal of Acquittal on Misappreciation of Evidence

Facilitation Equals Participation: Section 149 IPC Liability for Transporting Assailants and Immobilizing Victims; Appellate Reversal of Acquittal on Misappreciation of Evidence

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Facilitation Equals Participation: Section 149 IPC Liability for Transporting Assailants and Immobilizing Victims; Appellate Reversal of Acquittal on Misappreciation of Evidence Introduction In...
Pay-and-Recover Applies to Route Deviations: Insurer Must First Satisfy Third-Party Claims Despite Permit Breach

Pay-and-Recover Applies to Route Deviations: Insurer Must First Satisfy Third-Party Claims Despite Permit Breach

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Pay-and-Recover Applies to Route Deviations: Insurer Must First Satisfy Third-Party Claims Despite Permit Breach Introduction Case: K. Nagendra v. The New India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors. Citation:...
Demand-and-Acceptance First: Supreme Court Restores Acquittal and Clarifies Limits on Reversing PC Act Acquittals and the Value of Phenolphthalein Tests

Demand-and-Acceptance First: Supreme Court Restores Acquittal and Clarifies Limits on Reversing PC Act Acquittals and the Value of Phenolphthalein Tests

Date: Oct 29, 2025
Demand-and-Acceptance First: Supreme Court Restores Acquittal and Clarifies Limits on Reversing PC Act Acquittals and the Value of Phenolphthalein Tests Case: P. Somaraju v. State of Andhra Pradesh,...
Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC Not Attracted in Cross-FIR Homicides: Supreme Court Affirms 302/149 on Strength of Injured Eyewitness Testimony; Delay in FIR and Non‑Recovery of Weapons Not Fatal

Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC Not Attracted in Cross-FIR Homicides: Supreme Court Affirms 302/149 on Strength of Injured Eyewitness Testimony; Delay in FIR and Non‑Recovery of Weapons Not Fatal

Date: Oct 29, 2025
Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC Not Attracted in Cross-FIR Homicides: Supreme Court Affirms 302/149 on Strength of Injured Eyewitness Testimony; Delay in FIR and Non‑Recovery of Weapons Not Fatal...
CRPS Holders Are Not Financial Creditors: Redemption Preconditions under Section 55 of the Companies Act Govern IBC ‘Default’

CRPS Holders Are Not Financial Creditors: Redemption Preconditions under Section 55 of the Companies Act Govern IBC ‘Default’

Date: Oct 28, 2025
CRPS Holders Are Not Financial Creditors: Redemption Preconditions under Section 55 of the Companies Act Govern IBC ‘Default’ Case: EPC Constructions India Limited (through Liquidator) v. M/s Matix...
Special Courts Retain Jurisdiction to Grant Interim Custody of NDPS-Seized Vehicles notwithstanding the 2022 Disposal Rules — Commentary on Denash v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2025 INSC 1258

Special Courts Retain Jurisdiction to Grant Interim Custody of NDPS-Seized Vehicles notwithstanding the 2022 Disposal Rules — Commentary on Denash v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2025 INSC 1258

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Special Courts Retain Jurisdiction to Grant Interim Custody of NDPS-Seized Vehicles notwithstanding the 2022 Disposal Rules Case: Denash v. State of Tamil Nadu Citation: 2025 INSC 1258 Court: Supreme...
Unexamined Complainants and Post‑dated Rules Cannot Sustain Departmental Guilt: Supreme Court Restores CAT in V.M. Saudagar

Unexamined Complainants and Post‑dated Rules Cannot Sustain Departmental Guilt: Supreme Court Restores CAT in V.M. Saudagar

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Unexamined Complainants and Post‑dated Rules Cannot Sustain Departmental Guilt: Supreme Court Restores CAT in V.M. Saudagar Case: V.M. Saudagar (Dead) through Legal Heirs v. The Divisional Commercial...
Witness Intimidation under Section 195A IPC is a Cognizable Offence: FIR Maintainable; Section 195(1)(b)(i) CrPC Filter Inapplicable; Complaint under Section 195A CrPC is an Additional, Optional Route

Witness Intimidation under Section 195A IPC is a Cognizable Offence: FIR Maintainable; Section 195(1)(b)(i) CrPC Filter Inapplicable; Complaint under Section 195A CrPC is an Additional, Optional Route

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Witness Intimidation under Section 195A IPC is a Cognizable Offence: FIR Maintainable; Section 195(1)(b)(i) CrPC Filter Inapplicable; Complaint under Section 195A CrPC is an Additional, Optional...
Continuing IP Infringement Creates Inherent Urgency Under Section 12A: Delay Alone Does Not Negate Exemption from Pre‑Institution Mediation

Continuing IP Infringement Creates Inherent Urgency Under Section 12A: Delay Alone Does Not Negate Exemption from Pre‑Institution Mediation

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Continuing IP Infringement Creates Inherent Urgency Under Section 12A: Delay Alone Does Not Negate Exemption from Pre‑Institution Mediation Case: Novenco Building and Industry A/S v. Xero Energy...
Pre‑1971 Plantations Protected: Supreme Court Clarifies Evidence Standards and Ceiling‑Limit Interaction under Sections 3(2)–3(3) of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971

Pre‑1971 Plantations Protected: Supreme Court Clarifies Evidence Standards and Ceiling‑Limit Interaction under Sections 3(2)–3(3) of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971

Date: Oct 19, 2025
Pre‑1971 Plantations Protected: Supreme Court Clarifies Evidence Standards and Ceiling‑Limit Interaction under Sections 3(2)–3(3) of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971...
Reasonable Accommodation and Omissive Discrimination: Supreme Court mandates horizontal enforcement of transgender equality under the 2019 Act

Reasonable Accommodation and Omissive Discrimination: Supreme Court mandates horizontal enforcement of transgender equality under the 2019 Act

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Reasonable Accommodation and Omissive Discrimination: Supreme Court mandates horizontal enforcement of transgender equality under the 2019 Act Introduction In Jane Kaushik v. Union of India, 2025...
Independence of Section 106 Groundless‑Threat Suits and Consolidation of Overlapping Patent Litigation in the Earlier‑Filed Forum: Supreme Court’s Guidance under Section 25 CPC

Independence of Section 106 Groundless‑Threat Suits and Consolidation of Overlapping Patent Litigation in the Earlier‑Filed Forum: Supreme Court’s Guidance under Section 25 CPC

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Independence of Section 106 Groundless‑Threat Suits and Consolidation of Overlapping Patent Litigation in the Earlier‑Filed Forum: Supreme Court’s Guidance under Section 25 CPC Case: Atomberg...
Mutually Destructive Ocular Testimony and Shifting Crime Scene: Supreme Court mandates benefit of doubt and extends acquittal to non‑appellant co‑convicts under Article 142

Mutually Destructive Ocular Testimony and Shifting Crime Scene: Supreme Court mandates benefit of doubt and extends acquittal to non‑appellant co‑convicts under Article 142

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Mutually Destructive Ocular Testimony and Shifting Crime Scene: Supreme Court mandates benefit of doubt and extends acquittal to non‑appellant co‑convicts under Article 142 Introduction In KANNAIYA...
Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC requires sudden provocation at the scene; killing a peace‑maker warrants no leniency in Section 304 Part‑II sentencing

Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC requires sudden provocation at the scene; killing a peace‑maker warrants no leniency in Section 304 Part‑II sentencing

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC requires sudden provocation at the scene; killing a peace‑maker warrants no leniency in Section 304 Part‑II sentencing Kotresh @ Kotrappa v. State of Karnataka, 2025...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert