Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Delhi High Court Case Commentaries

Quantified Settlement Notes as Accord and Satisfaction of Accrued Claims: Delhi High Court clarifies the reach of Sections 62 and 63 of the Contract Act

Quantified Settlement Notes as Accord and Satisfaction of Accrued Claims: Delhi High Court clarifies the reach of Sections 62 and 63 of the Contract Act

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Quantified Settlement Notes as Accord and Satisfaction of Accrued Claims: Delhi High Court clarifies the reach of Sections 62 and 63 of the Contract Act Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Zero‑Tolerance Protocol for Impersonated NGO Writs: Delhi High Court Orders Police Probe and Personal Costs for Fraud on the Court

Zero‑Tolerance Protocol for Impersonated NGO Writs: Delhi High Court Orders Police Probe and Personal Costs for Fraud on the Court

Date: Oct 15, 2025
Zero‑Tolerance Protocol for Impersonated NGO Writs: Police Probe and Personal Costs for Fraud on the Court Introduction Case: Delhi Ki Galiyan NGO v. Deputy Commissioner & Ors., W.P.(C) 10595/2024...
Six-Year Delay in Written Statement: Counsel’s Lapse Not a Shield; Limited Cross‑Examination Right Preserved

Six-Year Delay in Written Statement: Counsel’s Lapse Not a Shield; Limited Cross‑Examination Right Preserved

Date: Oct 13, 2025
Six-Year Delay in Written Statement: Counsel’s Lapse Not a Shield; Limited Cross‑Examination Right Preserved Introduction In CM(M) 1961/2025 (with CM APPL. 63525/2025 & 63524/2025), the Delhi High...
Non est Charge-Sheets under Rule 14(3) CCS(CCA): Delhi High Court Reaffirms B.V. Gopinath, Rejects Res Judicata and Prospective-Only Arguments

Non est Charge-Sheets under Rule 14(3) CCS(CCA): Delhi High Court Reaffirms B.V. Gopinath, Rejects Res Judicata and Prospective-Only Arguments

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Non est Charge-Sheets under Rule 14(3) CCS(CCA): Delhi High Court Reaffirms B.V. Gopinath, Rejects Res Judicata and Prospective-Only Arguments Case: Union of India through Secretary & Ors. v. Shri S...
Seizure of Digital Devices by Another Agency Negates Need for Custodial Interrogation in Cyber-Obscenity Cases: Ajaz Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Seizure of Digital Devices by Another Agency Negates Need for Custodial Interrogation in Cyber-Obscenity Cases: Ajaz Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Seizure of Digital Devices by Another Agency Negates Need for Custodial Interrogation in Cyber-Obscenity Cases: Delhi High Court’s Anticipatory Bail Ruling in Ajaz Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi) Case:...
Anti‑Profiteering, Not Price Control: Delhi High Court delineates DoE’s limited fee‑regulation power over unaided recognised schools under Sections 17, 18 and 24 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973

Anti‑Profiteering, Not Price Control: Delhi High Court delineates DoE’s limited fee‑regulation power over unaided recognised schools under Sections 17, 18 and 24 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Anti‑Profiteering, Not Price Control: Delhi High Court delineates DoE’s limited fee‑regulation power over unaided recognised schools under Sections 17, 18 and 24 of the Delhi School Education Act,...
Willful Disobedience Threshold in Tax Stay Matters: Briefly Reasoned Reliance on CBDT’s 20% Pre-Deposit Policy Is Not Contempt

Willful Disobedience Threshold in Tax Stay Matters: Briefly Reasoned Reliance on CBDT’s 20% Pre-Deposit Policy Is Not Contempt

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Willful Disobedience Threshold in Tax Stay Matters: Briefly Reasoned Reliance on CBDT’s 20% Pre-Deposit Policy Is Not Contempt Introduction In “Court on its own motion v. Anuradha Misra,” 2025 DHC...
Good‑Faith Shareholder Alerts to Lenders Are Protected; Internal Receipt by Corporate Employees Is Not “Publication” for Defamation: Delhi High Court’s Ritesh Bawri v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Good‑Faith Shareholder Alerts to Lenders Are Protected; Internal Receipt by Corporate Employees Is Not “Publication” for Defamation: Delhi High Court’s Ritesh Bawri v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Good‑Faith Shareholder Alerts to Lenders Are Protected; Internal Receipt by Corporate Employees Is Not “Publication” for Defamation: Delhi High Court’s Ritesh Bawri v. State (NCT of Delhi)...
Anti-Circumvention of Locus Standi in Unauthorized Construction Writs: Bare Ownership Claims Without Civil Action Do Not Confer Standing; Abuse of Article 226 Invites Exemplary Costs

Anti-Circumvention of Locus Standi in Unauthorized Construction Writs: Bare Ownership Claims Without Civil Action Do Not Confer Standing; Abuse of Article 226 Invites Exemplary Costs

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Anti-Circumvention of Locus Standi in Unauthorized Construction Writs: Bare Ownership Claims Without Civil Action Do Not Confer Standing; Abuse of Article 226 Invites Exemplary Costs Case: Shri...
Teachers versus “Other Academic Staff” under the IGNOU Act: Division Bench clarifies that 65-year superannuation and teacher-CAS are confined to “teachers” duly created or redesignated by valid Statute/Ordinance; 2007 draft Ordinance held withdrawn

Teachers versus “Other Academic Staff” under the IGNOU Act: Division Bench clarifies that 65-year superannuation and teacher-CAS are confined to “teachers” duly created or redesignated by valid Statute/Ordinance; 2007 draft Ordinance held withdrawn

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Teachers versus “Other Academic Staff” under the IGNOU Act: Division Bench clarifies that 65-year superannuation and teacher-CAS are confined to “teachers” duly created or redesignated by valid...
Reaffirmation that Medical Sales Representatives Are Not “Workmen” under Section 2(s) ID Act and the Limited Scope of Writ Review over Labour Court Findings

Reaffirmation that Medical Sales Representatives Are Not “Workmen” under Section 2(s) ID Act and the Limited Scope of Writ Review over Labour Court Findings

Date: Oct 7, 2025
Reaffirmation that Medical Sales Representatives Are Not “Workmen” under Section 2(s) ID Act and the Limited Scope of Writ Review over Labour Court Findings Introduction In SH. Samarendra Das v. M/s...
Section 52A Delay Is a Curable Irregularity and Colour Variance in Samples Is Non-Fatal at Bail Stage: Delhi High Court Reaffirms the Section 37 NDPS Bar in Courier-Parcel Heroin Cases

Section 52A Delay Is a Curable Irregularity and Colour Variance in Samples Is Non-Fatal at Bail Stage: Delhi High Court Reaffirms the Section 37 NDPS Bar in Courier-Parcel Heroin Cases

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Section 52A Delay Is a Curable Irregularity and Colour Variance in Samples Is Non-Fatal at Bail Stage: Delhi High Court Reaffirms the Section 37 NDPS Bar in Courier-Parcel Heroin Cases Introduction...
Replication Clock Starts When Belated Written Statement Is Taken on Record: Delhi High Court clarifies Rule 5, Chapter VII, DHC (Original Side) Rules in Helsinn v. Hetero

Replication Clock Starts When Belated Written Statement Is Taken on Record: Delhi High Court clarifies Rule 5, Chapter VII, DHC (Original Side) Rules in Helsinn v. Hetero

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Replication Clock Starts When Belated Written Statement Is Taken on Record: Delhi High Court clarifies Rule 5, Chapter VII, DHC (Original Side) Rules Case: Helsinn Healthcare SA & Anr. v. Hetero...
Single Credible Testimony Can Sustain Departmental Charges; Tribunal’s Review Confined to Process, Not Evidence Reappreciation — Director General v. Sanjeev Kumar (Delhi High Court, 26 September 2025)

Single Credible Testimony Can Sustain Departmental Charges; Tribunal’s Review Confined to Process, Not Evidence Reappreciation — Director General v. Sanjeev Kumar (Delhi High Court, 26 September 2025)

Date: Sep 29, 2025
Single Credible Testimony Can Sustain Departmental Charges; Tribunal’s Review Confined to Process, Not Evidence Reappreciation — Delhi High Court in Director General v. Sanjeev Kumar Introduction The...
Initial-Interest Confusion as Sufficient Ground for Trademark Infringement and Ex‑Parte Summary Judgment: Delhi High Court’s Ruling in Hotels.com, LP v. Barath M L (2025)

Initial-Interest Confusion as Sufficient Ground for Trademark Infringement and Ex‑Parte Summary Judgment: Delhi High Court’s Ruling in Hotels.com, LP v. Barath M L (2025)

Date: Sep 29, 2025
Initial-Interest Confusion as Sufficient Ground for Trademark Infringement and Ex‑Parte Summary Judgment: Hotels.com, LP v. Barath M L (Delhi High Court, 2025) Introduction In a decisive enforcement...
Notional Interest Counts: Delhi High Court Validates Objective Income Estimation for Ex‑Gratia Relief under Bank Schemes

Notional Interest Counts: Delhi High Court Validates Objective Income Estimation for Ex‑Gratia Relief under Bank Schemes

Date: Sep 29, 2025
Notional Interest Counts: Delhi High Court Validates Objective Income Estimation for Ex‑Gratia Relief under Bank Schemes Case: OMWATI v. The Bank of Maharashtra and Anr | Citation: 2025 DHC 8676 |...
Implied Maintenance Condition Under Section 23 of the Senior Citizens Act: Delhi High Court Affirms Cancellation of Gift Deeds Absent Express Clause or Pleading

Implied Maintenance Condition Under Section 23 of the Senior Citizens Act: Delhi High Court Affirms Cancellation of Gift Deeds Absent Express Clause or Pleading

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Implied Maintenance Condition Under Section 23 of the Senior Citizens Act: Delhi High Court Affirms Cancellation of Gift Deeds Absent Express Clause or Pleading Case: Smt. Varinder Kaur v. Smt....
Applying the “Larger Conspiracy” Lens at the Bail Stage: Delay and Parity Not Determinative in Communal-Riot Murder Cases — Mohd Tahir Hussain v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 DHC 8605

Applying the “Larger Conspiracy” Lens at the Bail Stage: Delay and Parity Not Determinative in Communal-Riot Murder Cases — Mohd Tahir Hussain v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 DHC 8605

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Applying the “Larger Conspiracy” Lens at the Bail Stage: Delay and Parity Not Determinative in Communal-Riot Murder Cases Case: Mohd Tahir Hussain v. State (NCT of Delhi) Citation: 2025 DHC 8605...
Meaningful Progress Over Mere Delay: Delhi High Court reaffirms the twin-test for bail under MCOCA and clarifies that prior acquittals do not defeat MCOCA invocation once cognizance has been taken

Meaningful Progress Over Mere Delay: Delhi High Court reaffirms the twin-test for bail under MCOCA and clarifies that prior acquittals do not defeat MCOCA invocation once cognizance has been taken

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Meaningful Progress Over Mere Delay: Delhi High Court reaffirms the twin-test for bail under MCOCA and clarifies that prior acquittals do not defeat MCOCA invocation once cognizance has been taken...
Liberal Interpretation of “Legal Heir or Representative” under the Consumer Protection Act: Brother of Deceased Consumer Has Locus to Maintain Medical Negligence Complaint; Impleadment of a Class-I Heir Relates Back

Liberal Interpretation of “Legal Heir or Representative” under the Consumer Protection Act: Brother of Deceased Consumer Has Locus to Maintain Medical Negligence Complaint; Impleadment of a Class-I Heir Relates Back

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Liberal Interpretation of “Legal Heir or Representative” under the Consumer Protection Act: Brother of Deceased Consumer Has Locus to Maintain Medical Negligence Complaint; Impleadment of a Class-I...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert