Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Delhi High Court Case Commentaries

Delhi HC Reinforces “Family-of-Marks” Protection: Exclusive Rights Over the Suffix “KIND” in Pharmaceutical & Allied Classes

Delhi HC Reinforces “Family-of-Marks” Protection: Exclusive Rights Over the Suffix “KIND” in Pharmaceutical & Allied Classes

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Delhi HC Reinforces “Family-of-Marks” Protection: Exclusive Rights Over the Suffix “KIND” in Pharmaceutical & Allied Classes 1. Introduction Mankind Pharma Ltd. v. Ram Kumar (M/s Dr. Kumars...
Generic Words, Disclaimers and Domain Names: Delhi HC bars monopoly over “Yatra” in Yatra Online Ltd. v. Mach Conferences & Events Ltd.

Generic Words, Disclaimers and Domain Names: Delhi HC bars monopoly over “Yatra” in Yatra Online Ltd. v. Mach Conferences & Events Ltd.

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Generic Words, Disclaimers and Domain Names: Delhi HC bars monopoly over “Yatra” in Yatra Online Ltd. v. Mach Conferences & Events Ltd. 1. Introduction On 22 August 2025, the Delhi High Court...
“Wilful Obstruction of Court-Appointed Commissioners as Criminal Contempt” – A Commentary on Court on its Own Motion v. Obsession Naaz & Ors. (2025 DHC 7206-DB)

“Wilful Obstruction of Court-Appointed Commissioners as Criminal Contempt” – A Commentary on Court on its Own Motion v. Obsession Naaz & Ors. (2025 DHC 7206-DB)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
“Wilful Obstruction of Court-Appointed Commissioners Constitutes Criminal Contempt”: Delhi High Court crystallises the ‘Knowledge-Plus-Obstruction’ Test 1. Introduction In Court on its Own Motion v....
Delhi High Court Affirms Privacy over Academic Records: Personal Educational Data Exempt from RTI under Section 8(1)(j)

Delhi High Court Affirms Privacy over Academic Records: Personal Educational Data Exempt from RTI under Section 8(1)(j)

Date: Aug 26, 2025
Delhi High Court Affirms Privacy over Academic Records: Personal Educational Data Exempt from RTI under Section 8(1)(j) Introduction On 25 August 2025, the Delhi High Court delivered a cluster...
No Pre‑Verification Duty and No Fiduciary Duty to the Adversary: Delhi High Court on the Limits of “Professional Misconduct” Against Opposing Counsel

No Pre‑Verification Duty and No Fiduciary Duty to the Adversary: Delhi High Court on the Limits of “Professional Misconduct” Against Opposing Counsel

Date: Aug 22, 2025
No Pre‑Verification Duty and No Fiduciary Duty to the Adversary: Delhi High Court on the Limits of “Professional Misconduct” Against Opposing Counsel Introduction In Chand Mehra v. Union of India &...
Estate-Level Liability from Coparcenary Property: Delhi High Court Recognizes Widowed Daughter‑in‑Law’s Maintenance Claim Against Deceased Father‑in‑Law’s Estate, Even When Widowhood Occurs Later

Estate-Level Liability from Coparcenary Property: Delhi High Court Recognizes Widowed Daughter‑in‑Law’s Maintenance Claim Against Deceased Father‑in‑Law’s Estate, Even When Widowhood Occurs Later

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Estate-Level Liability from Coparcenary Property: Widowed Daughter‑in‑Law’s Maintenance Claim Against Deceased Father‑in‑Law’s Estate, Even When Widowhood Occurs Later Commentary on GEETA SHARMA v....

      Delhi High Court on Internet-Based Territorial Jurisdiction and Co‑registered Marks: Aggregator Listings and Passive Websites Don’t Confer Jurisdiction; “Doctor” Held Non‑Distinctive for Disinfectants

Delhi High Court on Internet-Based Territorial Jurisdiction and Co‑registered Marks: Aggregator Listings and Passive Websites Don’t Confer Jurisdiction; “Doctor” Held Non‑Distinctive for Disinfectants

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Internet Listings Don’t Create Jurisdiction; Co‑Registration Bars Infringement: The Delhi High Court’s Roadmap for Online IP Suits and Composite Marks Introduction In Vikrant Chemico Industries Pvt...
Gang Rape Conviction Sustainable Against a Single Accused under Section 376DA IPC: Delhi High Court affirms primacy of a consistent child-victim testimony and limits of DNA lapses in Praveen @ Lallu v. State (2025)

Gang Rape Conviction Sustainable Against a Single Accused under Section 376DA IPC: Delhi High Court affirms primacy of a consistent child-victim testimony and limits of DNA lapses in Praveen @ Lallu v. State (2025)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Gang Rape Conviction Sustainable Against a Single Accused under Section 376DA IPC: Delhi High Court affirms primacy of a consistent child-victim testimony and limits of DNA lapses Introduction The...
Primacy of Statutorily-Sanctioned Layout-Plan Amendments over Private Compromise:
Delhi High Court Affirms MCD’s Exclusive Authority to Alter Land-Use Consistent with the Master Plan

Primacy of Statutorily-Sanctioned Layout-Plan Amendments over Private Compromise: Delhi High Court Affirms MCD’s Exclusive Authority to Alter Land-Use Consistent with the Master Plan

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Primacy of Statutorily-Sanctioned Layout-Plan Amendments over Private Compromise: Mohit Goel v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2025 DHC 6992) 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s judgment in Mohit Goel and...
Delhi High Court Re-Affirms “Partial-Severability” under Section 34 and Upholds Government-Linked Pricing of APM Gas

Delhi High Court Re-Affirms “Partial-Severability” under Section 34 and Upholds Government-Linked Pricing of APM Gas

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Delhi High Court Re-Affirms “Partial-Severability” under Section 34 and Upholds Government-Linked Pricing of APM Gas 1. Introduction In Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd. v. GAIL (India)...
Delhi High Court Mandates Pre‑Bid Challenges for PAC Tenders: Non‑Participants Lack Locus to Contest Procurement

Delhi High Court Mandates Pre‑Bid Challenges for PAC Tenders: Non‑Participants Lack Locus to Contest Procurement

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Pre‑Bid Challenges Mandatory for PAC Tenders: Delhi High Court Clarifies Locus and Timelines for Judicial Review in Public Procurement Case: Rotoffset Corporation v. Security Printing and Minting...
“Sick and Infirm” Is Not an Automatic Bypass to PMLA’s Twin Conditions: Delhi High Court’s Gravity-Centric Bail Standard in Mega Economic Offences

“Sick and Infirm” Is Not an Automatic Bypass to PMLA’s Twin Conditions: Delhi High Court’s Gravity-Centric Bail Standard in Mega Economic Offences

Date: Aug 20, 2025
“Sick and Infirm” Is Not an Automatic Bypass to PMLA’s Twin Conditions: Delhi High Court’s Gravity-Centric Bail Standard in Mega Economic Offences Introduction In ARVIND DHAM v. Directorate of...
Prosecution Lapses Are Not a Passport to Bail: Delhi High Court Prioritizes Merits and Victim Testimony in POCSO/BNS Cases

Prosecution Lapses Are Not a Passport to Bail: Delhi High Court Prioritizes Merits and Victim Testimony in POCSO/BNS Cases

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Prosecution Lapses Are Not a Passport to Bail: Delhi High Court Prioritizes Merits and Victim Testimony in POCSO/BNS Cases Introduction In Keshav Kumar @ Tushar v. State (GNCT) of Delhi and Anr....
Reaffirming the “Conscious-Possession” Doctrine for Inadvertent Ammunition: Commentary on Harjeet Singh Talwar v. State (2025 DHC 6790)

Reaffirming the “Conscious-Possession” Doctrine for Inadvertent Ammunition: Commentary on Harjeet Singh Talwar v. State (2025 DHC 6790)

Date: Aug 12, 2025
Reaffirming the “Conscious-Possession” Doctrine for Inadvertent Ammunition Commentary on Harjeet Singh Talwar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) 2025 DHC 6790 Citation: 2025 DHC 6790, Delhi High Court...
“Regular Service in the Grade” Extends to Service in an Analogous Post: The Bhupinder Kumar Malik Precedent

“Regular Service in the Grade” Extends to Service in an Analogous Post: The Bhupinder Kumar Malik Precedent

Date: Aug 9, 2025
“Regular Service in the Grade” Extends to Service in an Analogous Post (Commentary on Delhi High Court’s decision in Bhupinder Kumar Malik v. Union of India, 2025 DHC 6630-DB) 1. Introduction This...
Section 74(2) Approval as the Jurisdictional Gatekeeper for SSFC Trials of Civil Offences; Mental Illness Alone Does Not Bar Trial: Commentary on Anil Kumar Upadhaya v. UOI (2025 DHC 6617-DB)

Section 74(2) Approval as the Jurisdictional Gatekeeper for SSFC Trials of Civil Offences; Mental Illness Alone Does Not Bar Trial: Commentary on Anil Kumar Upadhaya v. UOI (2025 DHC 6617-DB)

Date: Aug 9, 2025
Section 74(2) Approval as the Jurisdictional Gatekeeper for SSFC Trials of Civil Offences; Mental Illness Alone Does Not Bar Trial: Commentary on Anil Kumar Upadhaya v. UOI (2025 DHC 6617-DB)...
Delhi High Court Declares: No Pendente-Lite Maintenance Where Applicant Has Adequate Means and Respondent Is Financially Incapacitated (Yashwani Verma v. Virender Verma, 2025)

Delhi High Court Declares: No Pendente-Lite Maintenance Where Applicant Has Adequate Means and Respondent Is Financially Incapacitated (Yashwani Verma v. Virender Verma, 2025)

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Delhi High Court Declares: No Pendente-Lite Maintenance Where Applicant Has Adequate Means and Respondent Is Financially Incapacitated (An authoritative commentary on Yashwani Verma v. Virender...
“Shared-Household” Rights Do Not Defeat Co-Owners’ Right to Partition: Delhi High Court’s New Rule in Smita Jina v. Amit Kumar Jina

“Shared-Household” Rights Do Not Defeat Co-Owners’ Right to Partition: Delhi High Court’s New Rule in Smita Jina v. Amit Kumar Jina

Date: Aug 7, 2025
“Shared-Household” Rights Do Not Defeat Co-Owners’ Right to Partition Commentary on Delhi High Court decision in Smita Jina v. Amit Kumar Jina (2025 DHC 6421-DB) Introduction The Division Bench of...
“Proportionality & Judicial Discretion over Peremptory Cost-Orders” – A Commentary on VI-John Healthcare India LLP v. Dabur India Ltd. (2025 DHC 6269)

“Proportionality & Judicial Discretion over Peremptory Cost-Orders” – A Commentary on VI-John Healthcare India LLP v. Dabur India Ltd. (2025 DHC 6269)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Proportionality & Judicial Discretion over Peremptory Cost-Orders” A Detailed Commentary on VI-John Healthcare India LLP v. Dabur India Ltd. (2025 DHC 6269) 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s...
“The Marginal-Excess Doctrine” – Delhi High Court Softens the Rigours of Section 37 NDPS Act for Quantities Only Slightly Above the Commercial Threshold

“The Marginal-Excess Doctrine” – Delhi High Court Softens the Rigours of Section 37 NDPS Act for Quantities Only Slightly Above the Commercial Threshold

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“The Marginal-Excess Doctrine” – Delhi High Court Softens the Rigours of Section 37 NDPS Act for Quantities Only Slightly Above the Commercial Threshold 1. Introduction In Vinay Sharma v. State Govt....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert