Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Iowa Case Commentaries

Clarifying Iowa’s Workers’ Compensation Exclusivity: Gross Negligence Exception and Limits on Intentional Tort Claims Against Employers

Clarifying Iowa’s Workers’ Compensation Exclusivity: Gross Negligence Exception and Limits on Intentional Tort Claims Against Employers

Date: May 24, 2025
Clarifying Iowa’s Workers’ Compensation Exclusivity: Gross Negligence Exception and Limits on Intentional Tort Claims Against Employers Introduction This commentary examines the Iowa Supreme Court’s...
Greater Right to Possession of Seized Funds under Iowa Code §809.5: Bitcoin Depot v. Carlson

Greater Right to Possession of Seized Funds under Iowa Code §809.5: Bitcoin Depot v. Carlson

Date: May 17, 2025
Greater Right to Possession of Seized Funds under Iowa Code §809.5: Bitcoin Depot v. Carlson Introduction In In the Matter of Property Seized for Forfeiture from Bitcoin Depot Operating, LLC v....
Judicial Notice of Prior Convictions and Illegal Sentence Remand in State v. Gale

Judicial Notice of Prior Convictions and Illegal Sentence Remand in State v. Gale

Date: May 17, 2025
Judicial Notice of Prior Convictions and Illegal Sentence Remand in State v. Gale Introduction The Supreme Court of Iowa’s decision in State of Iowa v. Vanessa Renae Gale (No. 23-1786, filed May 16,...
Reaffirmation of Attorney Diligence Obligations: Public Reprimand for Repeated Missed Appellate Deadlines

Reaffirmation of Attorney Diligence Obligations: Public Reprimand for Repeated Missed Appellate Deadlines

Date: May 17, 2025
Reaffirmation of Attorney Diligence Obligations: Public Reprimand for Repeated Missed Appellate Deadlines Introduction In Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Karmen R. Anderson, No....
In-Person Notification Requirement as an Essential Element of Sex Offender Registration Violations

In-Person Notification Requirement as an Essential Element of Sex Offender Registration Violations

Date: May 17, 2025
In-Person Notification Requirement as an Essential Element of Sex Offender Registration Violations Introduction State of Iowa v. Ronald Eugene Cooley (No. 23-1375, Iowa Supreme Court, May 16, 2025)...
Extension of the Fair-Report Privilege to Government Bodies for Publishing Public Meeting Records

Extension of the Fair-Report Privilege to Government Bodies for Publishing Public Meeting Records

Date: May 17, 2025
Extension of the Fair-Report Privilege to Government Bodies for Publishing Public Meeting Records 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Iowa Supreme Court’s decision in Amie Villarini v. Iowa...
Broad Enforcement of Iowa’s Credit Agreement Statute of Frauds: Bar to Tort Claims Arising from Unwritten Agreements

Broad Enforcement of Iowa’s Credit Agreement Statute of Frauds: Bar to Tort Claims Arising from Unwritten Agreements

Date: May 10, 2025
Broad Enforcement of Iowa’s Credit Agreement Statute of Frauds: Bar to Tort Claims Arising from Unwritten Agreements Introduction County Bank v. Shalla (Iowa 2025) centers on a dispute arising from...
Qualified Immunity Under Iowa Code §670.4A Limits and Pseudonymous Pleading Standards

Qualified Immunity Under Iowa Code §670.4A Limits and Pseudonymous Pleading Standards

Date: May 10, 2025
Qualified Immunity Under Iowa Code §670.4A Limits and Pseudonymous Pleading Standards Introduction This commentary analyzes the Iowa Supreme Court’s decision in Parent Father Doe and Parent Mother...
LULAC v. Pate: Clarifying Organizational Standing—Resource Diversion Does Not Constitute Legally Cognizable Injury

LULAC v. Pate: Clarifying Organizational Standing—Resource Diversion Does Not Constitute Legally Cognizable Injury

Date: May 10, 2025
LULAC v. Pate: Clarifying Organizational Standing—Resource Diversion Does Not Constitute Legally Cognizable Injury Introduction League of United Latin American Citizens of Iowa (LULAC) filed suit in...
Clarifying “Prohibited Practices” Under Iowa’s Consumer Fraud Act: Intent, Reliance, and Written-Contract Controls

Clarifying “Prohibited Practices” Under Iowa’s Consumer Fraud Act: Intent, Reliance, and Written-Contract Controls

Date: May 3, 2025
Clarifying “Prohibited Practices” Under Iowa’s Consumer Fraud Act: Intent, Reliance, and Written-Contract Controls Introduction The dispute in Bradshaw Renovations, LLC v. Barry Graham & Jacklynn...
Interest-of-Justice Jurisdiction for Conditional Guilty Pleas and the Continued Validity of the Automobile Exception

Interest-of-Justice Jurisdiction for Conditional Guilty Pleas and the Continued Validity of the Automobile Exception

Date: May 3, 2025
Interest-of-Justice Jurisdiction for Conditional Guilty Pleas and the Continued Validity of the Automobile Exception Introduction The Supreme Court of Iowa’s decision in State of Iowa v. Amadeus...
Estate of Morgan v. Union Pacific: FELA Excludes Harassment-Induced Suicide Outside the Zone of Danger

Estate of Morgan v. Union Pacific: FELA Excludes Harassment-Induced Suicide Outside the Zone of Danger

Date: Apr 26, 2025
Estate of Morgan v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.: FELA Excludes Harassment-Induced Suicide Outside the Zone of Danger Introduction This case arises from the tragic death of Phillip Raymond Morgan, a...
Modification Authority Extended: Courts May Alter Non-Custodial Terms of Custody Decrees

Modification Authority Extended: Courts May Alter Non-Custodial Terms of Custody Decrees

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Modification Authority Extended: Courts May Alter Non-Custodial Terms of Custody Decrees Introduction In Katie Venechuk n/k/a Katie Vandewalker v. Gary A. Landherr, No. 23-0826 (Iowa Apr. 18, 2025),...
New Precedent: Judicial Officers’ Unwavering Impartiality and the Necessity of Removal for Bias and Prejudice

New Precedent: Judicial Officers’ Unwavering Impartiality and the Necessity of Removal for Bias and Prejudice

Date: Apr 19, 2025
New Precedent: Judicial Officers’ Unwavering Impartiality and the Necessity of Removal for Bias and Prejudice Introduction In In the Matter of Hon. David James Hanson, the Iowa Supreme Court...
Defective Workmanship Not an “Occurrence” or “Property Damage” Under CGL: Dostart v. Columbia Insurance Group

Defective Workmanship Not an “Occurrence” or “Property Damage” Under CGL: Dostart v. Columbia Insurance Group

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Defective Workmanship Not an “Occurrence” or “Property Damage” Under CGL: Dostart v. Columbia Insurance Group Introduction In John Dostart and Deena Dostart v. Columbia Insurance Group, the Supreme...
Substantial Compliance in Employer Random Drug‐Testing Pools: Hampe v. Charles Gabus Motors

Substantial Compliance in Employer Random Drug‐Testing Pools: Hampe v. Charles Gabus Motors

Date: Apr 12, 2025
Substantial Compliance in Employer Random Drug‐Testing Pools: Hampe v. Charles Gabus Motors Introduction This commentary examines the Iowa Supreme Court’s April 11, 2025 decision in Scott Hampe v....
Nonviability of Godfrey Constitutional Tort Claims: Supreme Court of Iowa Decision

Nonviability of Godfrey Constitutional Tort Claims: Supreme Court of Iowa Decision

Date: Apr 5, 2025
Nonviability of Godfrey Constitutional Tort Claims Introduction This commentary examines the Iowa Supreme Court’s per curiam decision in Wagner v. State of Iowa and William L. Spece, No. 22-1625,...
Zoning Appeals under § 335.18 Exempt from MTCA Pleading Rules and Clarified Standing Standards

Zoning Appeals under § 335.18 Exempt from MTCA Pleading Rules and Clarified Standing Standards

Date: Apr 5, 2025
Zoning Appeals under § 335.18 Exempt from MTCA Pleading Rules and Clarified Standing Standards Introduction In 1000 Friends of Iowa et al. v. Polk County Board of Supervisors, No. 23-1199 (Iowa Apr....
Only the First Outcry Counts: Iowa Supreme Court Defines “Initial Disclosure” Under § 622.31B as the First Disclosure

Only the First Outcry Counts: Iowa Supreme Court Defines “Initial Disclosure” Under § 622.31B as the First Disclosure

Date: Mar 29, 2025
Only the First Outcry Counts: Iowa Supreme Court Defines “Initial Disclosure” Under § 622.31B as the First Disclosure Introduction In State of Iowa v. Allan Robert Sievers, No. 23-0413 (Iowa Mar. 28,...
Post-Remand Ambiguity as Good Cause: Iowa Supreme Court Requires Leniency on § 668.11 Expert Deadlines When Appeals Create Uncertainty

Post-Remand Ambiguity as Good Cause: Iowa Supreme Court Requires Leniency on § 668.11 Expert Deadlines When Appeals Create Uncertainty

Date: Mar 22, 2025
Post-Remand Ambiguity as Good Cause: Iowa Supreme Court Requires Leniency on § 668.11 Expert Deadlines When Appeals Create Uncertainty Introduction In Jahn Patric Kirlin and Sara Louise Kirlin v. Dr....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert