Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Maryland Case Commentaries

Klauenberg v. State of Maryland: Establishing Standards for Admissibility of Bad Acts Evidence

Klauenberg v. State of Maryland: Establishing Standards for Admissibility of Bad Acts Evidence

Date: Aug 26, 1999
Klauenberg v. State of Maryland: Establishing Standards for Admissibility of Bad Acts Evidence Introduction Klauenberg v. State of Maryland, 355 Md. 528 (1999), is a pivotal case in Maryland...
Calomiris v. Woods: Upholding Express Terms in Mortgage Partial Release Provisions

Calomiris v. Woods: Upholding Express Terms in Mortgage Partial Release Provisions

Date: Mar 16, 1999
Calomiris v. Woods: Upholding Express Terms in Mortgage Partial Release Provisions Introduction In the landmark case of Calomiris v. Woods, the Court of Appeals of Maryland addressed significant...
Best Interest of the Child Standard Prevails Over Interstate Compact Violations in Adoption Proceedings

Best Interest of the Child Standard Prevails Over Interstate Compact Violations in Adoption Proceedings

Date: Oct 11, 1997
Best Interest of the Child Standard Prevails Over Interstate Compact Violations in Adoption Proceedings Introduction IN RE ADOPTION/GUARDIANSHIP NO. 3598 is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Court of...
Best Interest of the Child Standard in Custody Cases: Analysis of Wagner v. Wagner

Best Interest of the Child Standard in Custody Cases: Analysis of Wagner v. Wagner

Date: May 1, 1996
Best Interest of the Child Standard in Custody Cases: Analysis of Wagner v. Wagner Introduction Robin L. Wagner (Schwartz) v. Richard B. Wagner is a seminal case adjudicated by the Court of Special...
Expanding the Scope of Maryland's Consumer Protection Act: Insights from Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. Scarlett Harbor Associates

Expanding the Scope of Maryland's Consumer Protection Act: Insights from Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. Scarlett Harbor Associates

Date: Apr 4, 1996
Expanding the Scope of Maryland's Consumer Protection Act: Insights from Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Introduction The case of Hartford Accident and Indemnity...
Affirmation of At-Will Employment Doctrine and Limited Exceptions: Bagwell v. Peninsula Regional Medical Center

Affirmation of At-Will Employment Doctrine and Limited Exceptions: Bagwell v. Peninsula Regional Medical Center

Date: Sep 29, 1995
Affirmation of At-Will Employment Doctrine and Limited Exceptions: Bagwell v. Peninsula Regional Medical Center Introduction In the case of Robert Fulton Bagwell, Jr. v. Peninsula Regional Medical...
Reaffirming Gross Negligence Standards in Police Use of Deadly Force: State of Maryland v. Christopher J. Albrecht

Reaffirming Gross Negligence Standards in Police Use of Deadly Force: State of Maryland v. Christopher J. Albrecht

Date: Dec 6, 1994
Reaffirming Gross Negligence Standards in Police Use of Deadly Force: State of Maryland v. Christopher J. Albrecht Introduction The case of State of Maryland v. Christopher J. Albrecht (336 Md. 475,...
Limiting Visitation Rights of HIV-Positive Parents: Insights from DAVID KEVIN NORTH v. KATHRYN DIONNE NORTH

Limiting Visitation Rights of HIV-Positive Parents: Insights from DAVID KEVIN NORTH v. KATHRYN DIONNE NORTH

Date: Oct 26, 1994
Limiting Visitation Rights of HIV-Positive Parents: Insights from DAVID KEVIN NORTH v. KATHRYN DIONNE NORTH Introduction The case of David Kevin North v. Kathryn Dionne North, decided by the Court of...
Compliance with Statutory Standards and Product Liability: Insights from Beattly v. Trailmaster Products

Compliance with Statutory Standards and Product Liability: Insights from Beattly v. Trailmaster Products

Date: Jun 11, 1993
Compliance with Statutory Standards and Product Liability: Insights from Beattly v. Trailmaster Products Introduction The case of Beattly v. Trailmaster Products, Inc. et al. (330 Md. 726, Court of...
Limited Fiduciary Duty of Banks in Construction Loans: Insights from Parker v. Columbia Bank

Limited Fiduciary Duty of Banks in Construction Loans: Insights from Parker v. Columbia Bank

Date: Apr 15, 1992
Limited Fiduciary Duty of Banks in Construction Loans: Insights from Parker v. Columbia Bank Introduction In the evolving landscape of real estate finance, the duties and responsibilities of lenders...
Legislative Intent and Statutory Harmonization: Affirming the Continued Existence of the Baltimore Authority

Legislative Intent and Statutory Harmonization: Affirming the Continued Existence of the Baltimore Authority

Date: May 16, 1987
Legislative Intent and Statutory Harmonization: Affirming the Continued Existence of the Baltimore Authority Introduction The case William Kaczorowski v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore et al....
Duty of Reasonable Care in Loan Processing: Analysis of Jacques v. The First National Bank of Maryland

Duty of Reasonable Care in Loan Processing: Analysis of Jacques v. The First National Bank of Maryland

Date: Oct 9, 1986
Duty of Reasonable Care in Loan Processing: Analysis of Jacques v. The First National Bank of Maryland Introduction The case of Robert Anthony Jacques et ux. v. The First National Bank of Maryland...
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: Insights from SHARON MARIE HAMILTON ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY ET AL.

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: Insights from SHARON MARIE HAMILTON ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY ET AL.

Date: May 3, 1986
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress in Debt Collection Practices: A Comprehensive Analysis of SHARON MARIE HAMILTON ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY ET AL. Introduction The case of Sharon...
Extension of the Discovery Rule to All Negligence Actions in Maryland

Extension of the Discovery Rule to All Negligence Actions in Maryland

Date: Jul 10, 1981
Extension of the Discovery Rule to All Negligence Actions in Maryland Introduction Howard W. Poffenberger, Jr. v. Donald E. Risser et al. is a pivotal case decided by the Court of Appeals of Maryland...
Reaffirmation of Parens Patriae: Montgomery County v. Sanders Establishes Limits on "Psychological Parenthood" in Custody Cases

Reaffirmation of Parens Patriae: Montgomery County v. Sanders Establishes Limits on "Psychological Parenthood" in Custody Cases

Date: Jan 11, 1978
Reaffirmation of Parens Patriae: Montgomery County v. Sanders Establishes Limits on "Psychological Parenthood" in Custody Cases Introduction Montgomery County Department of Social Services, ET AL. v....
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress in Maryland: Court of Appeals Decision in Harris v. Jones Clarifies Legal Standards

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress in Maryland: Court of Appeals Decision in Harris v. Jones Clarifies Legal Standards

Date: Dec 10, 1977
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress in Maryland: Court of Appeals Decision in Harris v. Jones Clarifies Legal Standards Introduction In Harris v. Jones et al, 281 Md. 560 (1977), the Court...
Establishing a Uniform 'Harmless Error' Standard in Maryland: An Analysis of Dorsey v. State (1976)

Establishing a Uniform 'Harmless Error' Standard in Maryland: An Analysis of Dorsey v. State (1976)

Date: Jan 10, 1976
Establishing a Uniform 'Harmless Error' Standard in Maryland: An Analysis of Dorsey v. State (1976) Introduction Dorsey v. State of Maryland, 276 Md. 638 (1976), is a landmark decision by the Court...
Ensuring Due Process: Retroactive Application of MULLANEY v. WILBUR in Maryland's Felonious Homicide Law

Ensuring Due Process: Retroactive Application of MULLANEY v. WILBUR in Maryland's Felonious Homicide Law

Date: Nov 26, 1975
Ensuring Due Process: Retroactive Application of MULLANEY v. WILBUR in Maryland's Felonious Homicide Law Introduction Edward Evans v. State of Maryland, adjudicated by the Court of Special Appeals of...
Evaluating Prosecutorial Statements for Prejudice: Insights from Wilhelm v. State and COOK v. STATE

Evaluating Prosecutorial Statements for Prejudice: Insights from Wilhelm v. State and COOK v. STATE

Date: Sep 27, 1974
Evaluating Prosecutorial Statements for Prejudice: Insights from Wilhelm v. State and COOK v. STATE 1. Introduction The cases of Wilhelm v. State of Maryland and COOK v. STATE of Maryland, decided by...
Aiding and Abetting Escape: Comprehensive Analysis of Williams v. State of Maryland

Aiding and Abetting Escape: Comprehensive Analysis of Williams v. State of Maryland

Date: Nov 21, 1968
Aiding and Abetting Escape: Comprehensive Analysis of Williams v. State of Maryland 1. Introduction Case Citation: Williams, McClelland, and McClelland v. State of Maryland, 5 Md. App. 450 (1968)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert