Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Special Courts Case Commentaries

Exclusion of Employer-Provided Lodging Under IRC Section 119: The Vanicek and Moden Decision

Exclusion of Employer-Provided Lodging Under IRC Section 119: The Vanicek and Moden Decision

Date: Nov 7, 1985
Exclusion of Employer-Provided Lodging Under IRC Section 119: The Vanicek and Moden Decision Introduction The case of Edward Vanicek, Deceased, and Sara Vanicek v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue,...
Tax Court Affirms Jurisdiction to Address Unreceived Refunds in Deficiency Determinations

Tax Court Affirms Jurisdiction to Address Unreceived Refunds in Deficiency Determinations

Date: Oct 1, 1985
Tax Court Affirms Jurisdiction to Address Unreceived Refunds in Deficiency Determinations Introduction In the landmark case of Donald A. Naftel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (85 T.C. 527,...
Tax Court Establishes Jurisdiction to Address Nonreceipt of Refunds in Deficiency Calculations

Tax Court Establishes Jurisdiction to Address Nonreceipt of Refunds in Deficiency Calculations

Date: Oct 1, 1985
Tax Court Establishes Jurisdiction to Address Nonreceipt of Refunds in Deficiency Calculations Introduction In the case of Donald A. Naftel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (85 T.C. 527, 1985),...
Comprehensive Commentary on SANCTIONS UNDER THE NEW FEDERAL RULE 11

Comprehensive Commentary on SANCTIONS UNDER THE NEW FEDERAL RULE 11

Date: Jan 2, 1985
Sanctions Under the New Federal Rule 11: A Comprehensive Commentary Introduction The manifestation titled "SANCTIONS UNDER THE NEW FEDERAL RULE 11" was delivered by Judge William W. Schwarzer of the...
Rejecting Frivolous Altered Tax Returns: The Beard v. Commissioner Precedent

Rejecting Frivolous Altered Tax Returns: The Beard v. Commissioner Precedent

Date: May 25, 1984
Rejecting Frivolous Altered Tax Returns: The Beard v. Commissioner Precedent Introduction The case of Robert D. Beard v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, adjudicated by the United States Tax Court...
Adequate Notification Standards for Tolling Statute of Limitations in Tax Deficiency Cases

Adequate Notification Standards for Tolling Statute of Limitations in Tax Deficiency Cases

Date: Jul 21, 1983
Adequate Notification Standards for Tolling Statute of Limitations in Tax Deficiency Cases Introduction In the case of Gerald H. Frieling, Jr. and Joan L. Frieling v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue...
Actual Receipt of Notice of Deficiency Validates Tax Court Jurisdiction Despite Incorrect Mailing Address

Actual Receipt of Notice of Deficiency Validates Tax Court Jurisdiction Despite Incorrect Mailing Address

Date: Jul 21, 1983
Actual Receipt of Notice of Deficiency Validates Tax Court Jurisdiction Despite Incorrect Mailing Address Introduction The case of Richard L. Mulvania v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, adjudicated...
Revisiting Functionality in Trademark Law: The Morton-Norwich Products Decision

Revisiting Functionality in Trademark Law: The Morton-Norwich Products Decision

Date: Feb 19, 1982
Revisiting Functionality in Trademark Law: The Morton-Norwich Products Decision Introduction The case In re Morton-Norwich Products, Inc. (671 F.2d 1332) adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Addressing Deficiency Notices to APO Locations: Expanding Timely Filing Periods Under Section 6213(a)

Addressing Deficiency Notices to APO Locations: Expanding Timely Filing Periods Under Section 6213(a)

Date: Feb 9, 1982
Addressing Deficiency Notices to APO Locations: Expanding Timely Filing Periods Under Section 6213(a) Introduction The case of Henry M. Brown and Barbara J. Brown v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue...
Centralized Pretrial Proceedings for Multi-Piece Rim Products Liability Litigation

Centralized Pretrial Proceedings for Multi-Piece Rim Products Liability Litigation

Date: Jan 19, 1979
Centralized Pretrial Proceedings for Multi-Piece Rim Products Liability Litigation Introduction The case In re MULTI-PIECE RIM PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (464 F. Supp. 969) represents a...
Exception to Res Judicata in Tax Deficiency Cases Involving Fraud: Breman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Exception to Res Judicata in Tax Deficiency Cases Involving Fraud: Breman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Date: Apr 9, 1976
Exception to Res Judicata in Tax Deficiency Cases Involving Fraud: Breman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Introduction The case of M. William Breman and Sylvia G. Breman v. Commissioner of...
Jurisdiction Over Deceased Taxpayers: Edward J. Fehrs v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Jurisdiction Over Deceased Taxpayers: Edward J. Fehrs v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Date: Nov 19, 1975
Jurisdiction Over Deceased Taxpayers: Edward J. Fehrs v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Introduction Edward J. Fehrs, Deceased and Violette Fehrs brought forth a petition against the Commissioner...
Concurrent Use Agreements Mitigate Likelihood of Confusion: DuPont v. Horizon Industries

Concurrent Use Agreements Mitigate Likelihood of Confusion: DuPont v. Horizon Industries

Date: May 4, 1973
Concurrent Use Agreements Mitigate Likelihood of Confusion: DuPont v. Horizon Industries Introduction The case of DuPont DeNemours & Co. v. Horizon Industries Corporation, adjudicated by the United...
Broadening the Scope of Fraud in Patent Proceedings: Norton v. Curtiss

Broadening the Scope of Fraud in Patent Proceedings: Norton v. Curtiss

Date: Feb 12, 1971
Broadening the Scope of Fraud in Patent Proceedings: Norton v. Curtiss Introduction The case of Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. Curtiss pertains to a patent interference dispute adjudicated by the...
Clarifying 'Last Known Address' for Deficiency Notices: McCormick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Clarifying 'Last Known Address' for Deficiency Notices: McCormick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Date: Oct 27, 1970
Clarifying 'Last Known Address' for Deficiency Notices: McCormick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Introduction The case of Harvey L. McCormick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (55 T.C. 138)...
Golsan v. Commissioner: Disallowing Interest Deduction on Executive Special Life Insurance Policies

Golsan v. Commissioner: Disallowing Interest Deduction on Executive Special Life Insurance Policies

Date: Apr 10, 1970
Golsan v. Commissioner: Disallowing Interest Deduction on Executive Special Life Insurance Policies Introduction In the landmark case of JACK E. GOLSEN AND SYLVIA H. GOLSEN, PETITIONERS v....
Substance Over Form: Disallowing Interest Deductions in Executive Special Life Insurance Loans

Substance Over Form: Disallowing Interest Deductions in Executive Special Life Insurance Loans

Date: Apr 10, 1970
Substance Over Form: Disallowing Interest Deductions in Executive Special Life Insurance Loans Introduction The case of Jack E. Golsen and Sylvia H. Golsen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (54...
Comprehensive Commentary on In re Plumbing Fixture Cases

Comprehensive Commentary on In re Plumbing Fixture Cases

Date: Dec 28, 1968
Comprehensive Commentary on In re Plumbing Fixture Cases (298 F. Supp. 484) Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal...
Strict Substantiation Requirements for Entertainment Expenses Established in Sanford v. Commissioner

Strict Substantiation Requirements for Entertainment Expenses Established in Sanford v. Commissioner

Date: Sep 10, 1968
Strict Substantiation Requirements for Entertainment Expenses Established in Sanford v. Commissioner Introduction The case of William F. Sanford v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (50 T.C. 823)...
Comprehensive Analysis of the 1966 Amendments to Federal Civil and Criminal Procedure Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims

Comprehensive Analysis of the 1966 Amendments to Federal Civil and Criminal Procedure Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims

Date: Mar 1, 1966
Comprehensive Analysis of the 1966 Amendments to Federal Civil and Criminal Procedure Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims Introduction On February 28, 1966, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert