Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Venue Errors Do Not Defeat Judicial Immunity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Transfer and Dismissal in Ibhar Al Mheid v. Minchew

Venue Errors Do Not Defeat Judicial Immunity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Transfer and Dismissal in Ibhar Al Mheid v. Minchew

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Venue Errors Do Not Defeat Judicial Immunity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Transfer and Dismissal in Ibhar Al Mheid v. Minchew Introduction In Ibhar Al Mheid v. Katy Minchew et al., No. 24-11930 (11th...
Waiver Under Rule 72(a) Bars Appellate Review; “Stray Remarks” and Non‑Comparable Exchanges Do Not Sustain § 1981 Retail Discrimination Claims — Harris v. Bath & Body Works (11th Cir. 2025)

Waiver Under Rule 72(a) Bars Appellate Review; “Stray Remarks” and Non‑Comparable Exchanges Do Not Sustain § 1981 Retail Discrimination Claims — Harris v. Bath & Body Works (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Waiver Under Rule 72(a) Bars Appellate Review; “Stray Remarks” and Non‑Comparable Exchanges Do Not Sustain § 1981 Retail Discrimination Claims — Harris v. Bath & Body Works (11th Cir. 2025) Court:...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: Misadvice on Supervised-Release Maximum at Revocation Is Not Plain Error Absent Prejudice; District Courts May Weigh Context of Dismissed Violations When Varying Upward

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: Misadvice on Supervised-Release Maximum at Revocation Is Not Plain Error Absent Prejudice; District Courts May Weigh Context of Dismissed Violations When Varying Upward

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Misadvice at Supervised-Release Revocation Is Not Plain Error Without Prejudice; Broad Sentencing Latitude Under § 3583(e) Confirmed Case: United States v. Clonet Junior Charmant, No. 25-10202 (11th...
Recharacterization Without Notice Violates Due Process; Murder Cross‑Reference Does Not Defeat First Step Act Eligibility

Recharacterization Without Notice Violates Due Process; Murder Cross‑Reference Does Not Defeat First Step Act Eligibility

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Recharacterization Without Notice Violates Due Process; Murder Cross‑Reference Does Not Defeat First Step Act Eligibility Introduction This commentary analyzes the Eleventh Circuit’s unpublished, per...
Erlinger Claims Are Waivable: Eleventh Circuit Enforces Appeal Waiver and Upholds Georgia Marijuana PWID as an ACCA “Serious Drug Offense”

Erlinger Claims Are Waivable: Eleventh Circuit Enforces Appeal Waiver and Upholds Georgia Marijuana PWID as an ACCA “Serious Drug Offense”

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Erlinger Claims Are Waivable: Eleventh Circuit Enforces Appeal Waiver and Upholds Georgia Marijuana PWID as an ACCA “Serious Drug Offense” Introduction In United States v. Orlando Paradise (No....
Eleventh Circuit (post–Loper Bright) holds Florida “culpable negligence” child‑neglect convictions categorically qualify as a deportable “crime of child neglect” under INA § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i); Chevron‑era Pierre still exerts precedential force

Eleventh Circuit (post–Loper Bright) holds Florida “culpable negligence” child‑neglect convictions categorically qualify as a deportable “crime of child neglect” under INA § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i); Chevron‑era Pierre still exerts precedential force

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Post–Loper Bright framework: Florida “culpable negligence” child‑neglect is a categorical “crime of child neglect” under INA § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i), and Chevron‑era Pierre remains operative (for now)...
Reese v. SSA: Post-Dated Mental-Health Reports Are Not Chronologically Relevant Without Pre-Decision Corroboration; De Novo Review Permits Courts to Reach Materiality Not Addressed by the Appeals Council

Reese v. SSA: Post-Dated Mental-Health Reports Are Not Chronologically Relevant Without Pre-Decision Corroboration; De Novo Review Permits Courts to Reach Materiality Not Addressed by the Appeals Council

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Reese v. SSA: Post-Dated Mental-Health Reports Are Not Chronologically Relevant Without Pre-Decision Corroboration; De Novo Review Permits Courts to Reach Materiality Not Addressed by the Appeals...
No Backdoor via Rule 60(b)(4): Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Law‑of‑the‑Case Limits and Imposes Rule 38 Sanctions in Foley v. Orange County

No Backdoor via Rule 60(b)(4): Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Law‑of‑the‑Case Limits and Imposes Rule 38 Sanctions in Foley v. Orange County

Date: Nov 1, 2025
No Backdoor via Rule 60(b)(4): Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Law‑of‑the‑Case Limits and Imposes Rule 38 Sanctions in Foley v. Orange County Introduction In this unpublished, per curiam opinion, the U.S....
From FCHR “No Cause” to Federal Preclusion: Eleventh Circuit Bars § 1981 Claims and Reaffirms Strict Title VII Timeliness and Plausibility Requirements

From FCHR “No Cause” to Federal Preclusion: Eleventh Circuit Bars § 1981 Claims and Reaffirms Strict Title VII Timeliness and Plausibility Requirements

Date: Nov 1, 2025
From FCHR “No Cause” to Federal Preclusion: Eleventh Circuit Bars § 1981 Claims and Reaffirms Strict Title VII Timeliness and Plausibility Requirements Introduction In Elias Makere v. Allstate...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Rule 60(b)(3)’s One‑Year Clock Runs from Entry of the “Order,” Not Delayed by Rule 58’s Separate-Document Requirement; Reaffirms Exacting Standard for “Fraud on the Court” under Rule 60(d)(3)

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Rule 60(b)(3)’s One‑Year Clock Runs from Entry of the “Order,” Not Delayed by Rule 58’s Separate-Document Requirement; Reaffirms Exacting Standard for “Fraud on the Court” under Rule 60(d)(3)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Rule 60(b)(3)’s One‑Year Clock Runs from Entry of the “Order,” Not Delayed by Rule 58’s Separate-Document Requirement; Reaffirms Exacting Standard for “Fraud on the Court”...
Prior Prostitution Does Not Defeat Enticement or Undue-Influence Findings: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad Aiding-and-Abetting Liability in Minor Sex-Trafficking Cases

Prior Prostitution Does Not Defeat Enticement or Undue-Influence Findings: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad Aiding-and-Abetting Liability in Minor Sex-Trafficking Cases

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Prior Prostitution Does Not Defeat Enticement or Undue-Influence Findings: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad Aiding-and-Abetting Liability in Minor Sex-Trafficking Cases Introduction This non-argument,...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Limits on Ancillary Enforcement: No Rule 69/Section 56.29 Constructive-Trust Proceedings Against Non‑Judgment Debtors

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Limits on Ancillary Enforcement: No Rule 69/Section 56.29 Constructive-Trust Proceedings Against Non‑Judgment Debtors

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Limits on Ancillary Enforcement: No Rule 69/Section 56.29 Constructive-Trust Proceedings Against Non‑Judgment Debtors Introduction This appeal arises at the intersection of...
Intervening Misconduct Severs Retaliation Causation and Threadbare § 1981 Pleadings Fail: A Commentary on Goolsby v. City of Monroe (11th Cir.)

Intervening Misconduct Severs Retaliation Causation and Threadbare § 1981 Pleadings Fail: A Commentary on Goolsby v. City of Monroe (11th Cir.)

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Intervening Misconduct Severs Retaliation Causation and Threadbare § 1981 Pleadings Fail: Eleventh Circuit in Goolsby v. City of Monroe Introduction In Alicia Goolsby v. City of Monroe, the Eleventh...
Murray v. Miranda: Eleventh Circuit Forecloses Bivens Damages for Federal Prison Medical-Indifference Claims Where BOP Grievance Procedures Exist

Murray v. Miranda: Eleventh Circuit Forecloses Bivens Damages for Federal Prison Medical-Indifference Claims Where BOP Grievance Procedures Exist

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Murray v. Miranda: Eleventh Circuit Forecloses Bivens Damages for Federal Prison Medical-Indifference Claims Where BOP Grievance Procedures Exist Introduction In this unpublished, non-argument...
Ratification, Not Mere Approval: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Monell Pleading Against Florida School Boards and Confirms Supplemental Jurisdiction Discretion After Dismissal (Post‑Royal Canin)

Ratification, Not Mere Approval: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Monell Pleading Against Florida School Boards and Confirms Supplemental Jurisdiction Discretion After Dismissal (Post‑Royal Canin)

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Ratification, Not Mere Approval: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Monell Pleading Against Florida School Boards and Confirms Supplemental Jurisdiction Discretion After Dismissal (Post‑Royal Canin)...
Certified Uncertainties in Florida Proceedings Supplementary: Eleventh Circuit Sends Five Determinative Questions on § 56.29 Remedies, FUFTA Limitations, and Tolling to the Florida Supreme Court

Certified Uncertainties in Florida Proceedings Supplementary: Eleventh Circuit Sends Five Determinative Questions on § 56.29 Remedies, FUFTA Limitations, and Tolling to the Florida Supreme Court

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Certified Uncertainties in Florida Proceedings Supplementary: Eleventh Circuit Sends Five Determinative Questions on § 56.29 Remedies, FUFTA Limitations, and Tolling to the Florida Supreme Court...
No Blanket Immunity for Post‑Settlement Keyword Bidding: Eleventh Circuit Limits Release and Res Judicata to Pre‑Execution Conduct and Enforces FTC‑Approval Contingency

No Blanket Immunity for Post‑Settlement Keyword Bidding: Eleventh Circuit Limits Release and Res Judicata to Pre‑Execution Conduct and Enforces FTC‑Approval Contingency

Date: Oct 28, 2025
No Blanket Immunity for Post‑Settlement Keyword Bidding: Eleventh Circuit Limits Release and Res Judicata to Pre‑Execution Conduct and Enforces FTC‑Approval Contingency Case: Edible IP, LLC v....
ECF Non-Receipt, Health Issues, and Computer Viruses Are Not Excusable Neglect Without Specific, Supported Facts: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Counsel’s Duty to Monitor the Docket and Limits Post-Judgment Amendments

ECF Non-Receipt, Health Issues, and Computer Viruses Are Not Excusable Neglect Without Specific, Supported Facts: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Counsel’s Duty to Monitor the Docket and Limits Post-Judgment Amendments

Date: Oct 28, 2025
ECF Non-Receipt, Health Issues, and Computer Viruses Are Not Excusable Neglect Without Specific, Supported Facts: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Counsel’s Duty to Monitor the Docket and Limits...
Shotgun Pleadings, Pro Se Latitude, and Rule 58 Waiver: The Eleventh Circuit’s Reaffirmation in Moore v. Southern Company

Shotgun Pleadings, Pro Se Latitude, and Rule 58 Waiver: The Eleventh Circuit’s Reaffirmation in Moore v. Southern Company

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Shotgun Pleadings, Pro Se Latitude, and Rule 58 Waiver: The Eleventh Circuit’s Reaffirmation in Moore v. Southern Company Introduction In an unpublished, per curiam decision, the Eleventh Circuit...
Reaffirming Broad Discretion to Weigh Prior Sentences in Upward Variances: United States v. Carmel Linot (11th Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming Broad Discretion to Weigh Prior Sentences in Upward Variances: United States v. Carmel Linot (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Reaffirming Broad Discretion to Weigh Prior Sentences in Upward Variances Under § 3553(a): United States v. Carmel Linot Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Date: October 24, 2025...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert