Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

No Anti‑SLAPP Shield for Private‑Employer Contacts Without a Plausible Nexus to Government Proceedings: The First Circuit’s Post‑Bristol Application in Blakesley v. Marcus

No Anti‑SLAPP Shield for Private‑Employer Contacts Without a Plausible Nexus to Government Proceedings: The First Circuit’s Post‑Bristol Application in Blakesley v. Marcus

Date: Nov 2, 2025
No Anti‑SLAPP Shield for Private‑Employer Contacts Without a Plausible Nexus to Government Proceedings: The First Circuit’s Post‑Bristol Application in Blakesley v. Marcus Introduction In Blakesley...
No Collateral Attack on the JPML Lottery: Filing of the Administrative Record Fixes Venue Under 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a)

No Collateral Attack on the JPML Lottery: Filing of the Administrative Record Fixes Venue Under 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a)

Date: Nov 2, 2025
No Collateral Attack on the JPML Lottery: Filing of the Administrative Record Fixes Venue Under 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a) Introduction In Direct Action for Rights and Equality v. FCC, a consolidated set of...
State of Louisiana v. FCC: JPML Lottery Under 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a) Is Binding—Once the Record Is Filed, the Designated Circuit Retains Venue for Consolidated Agency-Review Petitions

State of Louisiana v. FCC: JPML Lottery Under 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a) Is Binding—Once the Record Is Filed, the Designated Circuit Retains Venue for Consolidated Agency-Review Petitions

Date: Nov 2, 2025
State of Louisiana v. FCC: JPML Lottery Under 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a) Is Binding—Once the Record Is Filed, the Designated Circuit Retains Venue for Consolidated Agency-Review Petitions Introduction In...
No Surprise Summary Judgment: First Circuit Clarifies Rule 12(d) Conversion, Rule 56(c)(4) Affidavits, and Medical Director Liability under Puerto Rico Article 1802

No Surprise Summary Judgment: First Circuit Clarifies Rule 12(d) Conversion, Rule 56(c)(4) Affidavits, and Medical Director Liability under Puerto Rico Article 1802

Date: Nov 1, 2025
No Surprise Summary Judgment: First Circuit Clarifies Rule 12(d) Conversion, Rule 56(c)(4) Affidavits, and Medical Director Liability under Puerto Rico Article 1802 Introduction This appeal arises...
Federal Contracts Do Not “Federalize” Municipal Detention Facilities: First Circuit Confirms § 1983 State-Action Status for Wyatt Officials

Federal Contracts Do Not “Federalize” Municipal Detention Facilities: First Circuit Confirms § 1983 State-Action Status for Wyatt Officials

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Federal Contracts Do Not “Federalize” Municipal Detention Facilities: First Circuit Confirms § 1983 State-Action Status for Wyatt Officials Introduction In Wright v. Martin, the United States Court...
No “U‑Turns” After 120 Days: First Circuit Holds MSPB Jurisdiction Controls Mixed‑Case Review and Erroneous Agency FADs Cannot Revive Expired Deadlines

No “U‑Turns” After 120 Days: First Circuit Holds MSPB Jurisdiction Controls Mixed‑Case Review and Erroneous Agency FADs Cannot Revive Expired Deadlines

Date: Oct 30, 2025
No “U‑Turns” After 120 Days: First Circuit Holds MSPB Jurisdiction Controls Mixed‑Case Review and Erroneous Agency FADs Cannot Revive Expired Deadlines Introduction In Irizarry Sierra v. Bisignano,...
Deliberate Indifference to Prolonged Loss of Potable Water Can Shock the Conscience: First Circuit Revives Morovis Water Crisis Suit

Deliberate Indifference to Prolonged Loss of Potable Water Can Shock the Conscience: First Circuit Revives Morovis Water Crisis Suit

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Deliberate Indifference to Prolonged Loss of Potable Water Can Shock the Conscience: First Circuit Revives Morovis Water Crisis Suit Introduction In Maldonado-González v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer...
United States v. Castillo: No Outrageous Misconduct for U.S.-Led Foreign Arrests; Pen Register Metadata Is Non‑Hearsay

United States v. Castillo: No Outrageous Misconduct for U.S.-Led Foreign Arrests; Pen Register Metadata Is Non‑Hearsay

Date: Oct 28, 2025
United States v. Castillo: No Outrageous Misconduct for U.S.-Led Foreign Arrests; Pen Register Metadata Is Non‑Hearsay Introduction In United States v. Castillo, the First Circuit affirmed the...
Triple Waiver and No-Prejudice Variance: The First Circuit’s Reinforcement of Preservation Rules in United States v. Paredes

Triple Waiver and No-Prejudice Variance: The First Circuit’s Reinforcement of Preservation Rules in United States v. Paredes

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Triple Waiver and No-Prejudice Variance: The First Circuit’s Reinforcement of Preservation Rules in United States v. Paredes Introduction This commentary analyzes the First Circuit’s unpublished...
No APA Deference for OPA Liability; Third-Party Admiralty Claims Trigger § 1292(a)(3): The First Circuit’s Framework in United States v. Ernst Jacob GmbH & Co. KG

No APA Deference for OPA Liability; Third-Party Admiralty Claims Trigger § 1292(a)(3): The First Circuit’s Framework in United States v. Ernst Jacob GmbH & Co. KG

Date: Oct 25, 2025
No APA Deference for OPA Liability; Third-Party Admiralty Claims Trigger § 1292(a)(3): The First Circuit’s Framework in United States v. Ernst Jacob GmbH & Co. KG Court: United States Court of...
Conlon v. Scaltreto: First Circuit shields beanbag-shotgun use under qualified immunity, revives deadly-force claim where “armed advancement” is disputed, and limits ADA/Monell theories in mental‑health encounters

Conlon v. Scaltreto: First Circuit shields beanbag-shotgun use under qualified immunity, revives deadly-force claim where “armed advancement” is disputed, and limits ADA/Monell theories in mental‑health encounters

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Conlon v. Scaltreto: First Circuit shields beanbag-shotgun use under qualified immunity, revives deadly-force claim where “armed advancement” is disputed, and limits ADA/Monell theories in...
When Opinions Become Facts: First Circuit Holds Baseless Personal‑Knowledge Vouching Can Be “False” Under §1001 and Rejects Money‑Laundering Merger Where Bribery Proceeds Arise at Agreement

When Opinions Become Facts: First Circuit Holds Baseless Personal‑Knowledge Vouching Can Be “False” Under §1001 and Rejects Money‑Laundering Merger Where Bribery Proceeds Arise at Agreement

Date: Oct 25, 2025
When Opinions Become Facts: Baseless Personal‑Knowledge Vouching Is Actionable Under §1001; False Invoices Can Support §1956(h) Concealment Without Merger Because Bribery Proceeds Arise at Agreement...
No Look-Through for FAA § 9: First Circuit Orders Without-Prejudice Dismissal and Avoids Standing Inquiry Post-Badgerow

No Look-Through for FAA § 9: First Circuit Orders Without-Prejudice Dismissal and Avoids Standing Inquiry Post-Badgerow

Date: Oct 23, 2025
No Look-Through for FAA § 9: First Circuit Orders Without-Prejudice Dismissal and Avoids Standing Inquiry Post-Badgerow Case: Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc. v. WorldNet Telecommunications, LLC...
StandWithUs v. MIT: First Circuit Harmonizes Title VI with the First Amendment and Rejects a Per Se Equation of Anti‑Zionism with Antisemitism

StandWithUs v. MIT: First Circuit Harmonizes Title VI with the First Amendment and Rejects a Per Se Equation of Anti‑Zionism with Antisemitism

Date: Oct 23, 2025
StandWithUs v. MIT: First Circuit Harmonizes Title VI with the First Amendment and Rejects a Per Se Equation of Anti‑Zionism with Antisemitism Introduction In StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice v....
FTCA Accrual Starts with Post‑Surgical Complications, Not Later Medical Imaging: The First Circuit’s Objective Discovery Rule in Roldán‑Barrios v. United States

FTCA Accrual Starts with Post‑Surgical Complications, Not Later Medical Imaging: The First Circuit’s Objective Discovery Rule in Roldán‑Barrios v. United States

Date: Oct 22, 2025
FTCA Accrual Starts with Post‑Surgical Complications, Not Later Medical Imaging: The First Circuit’s Objective Discovery Rule in Roldán‑Barrios v. United States Introduction In Roldán‑Barrios v....
A Second Superseding Indictment Restores Probable Cause and Forecloses FTCA Malicious Prosecution; No Bivens Extension for CBP Grand Jury Testimony

A Second Superseding Indictment Restores Probable Cause and Forecloses FTCA Malicious Prosecution; No Bivens Extension for CBP Grand Jury Testimony

Date: Oct 22, 2025
A Second Superseding Indictment Restores Probable Cause and Forecloses FTCA Malicious Prosecution; No Bivens Extension for CBP Grand Jury Testimony Introduction In Sanchez-Jimenez v. United States,...
Collective Knowledge and Stash‑House Nexus Suffice for a Vehicle Stop: United States v. Amado (1st Cir. 2025)

Collective Knowledge and Stash‑House Nexus Suffice for a Vehicle Stop: United States v. Amado (1st Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 19, 2025
Collective Knowledge and Stash‑House Nexus Suffice for a Vehicle Stop: United States v. Amado (1st Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Amado, the First Circuit affirmed both the convictions...
Assignees Must Prove Assignors’ Diversity or Non‑Collusive Purpose: First Circuit Orders Dismissal When Section 1359 Inquiry Fails

Assignees Must Prove Assignors’ Diversity or Non‑Collusive Purpose: First Circuit Orders Dismissal When Section 1359 Inquiry Fails

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Assignees Must Prove Assignors’ Diversity or Non‑Collusive Purpose: First Circuit Orders Dismissal When Section 1359 Inquiry Fails Case: Gore and Associates Management Co., Inc. v. SLSCO Ltd. and...
First Circuit Requires District Courts to Address Rehabilitation—In Combination with Family Circumstances—When Ruling on Compassionate Release under Amended U.S.S.G. §1B1.13

First Circuit Requires District Courts to Address Rehabilitation—In Combination with Family Circumstances—When Ruling on Compassionate Release under Amended U.S.S.G. §1B1.13

Date: Oct 17, 2025
First Circuit Requires District Courts to Address Rehabilitation—In Combination with Family Circumstances—When Ruling on Compassionate Release under Amended U.S.S.G. §1B1.13 Introduction In United...
Expert Testimony Is Required to Prove Non-Negligible Risk in Massachusetts Informed-Consent Claims: The First Circuit’s Clarification in Meka v. Haddad

Expert Testimony Is Required to Prove Non-Negligible Risk in Massachusetts Informed-Consent Claims: The First Circuit’s Clarification in Meka v. Haddad

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Expert Testimony Is Required to Prove Non-Negligible Risk in Massachusetts Informed-Consent Claims: The First Circuit’s Clarification in Meka v. Haddad Introduction In Meka v. Haddad, the United...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert