Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

No Right to Vote on a Particular Schedule: The Fifth Circuit Upholds Mid‑Cycle Redistricting and Treats “Vote Postponement” as Non-Disenfranchisement

No Right to Vote on a Particular Schedule: The Fifth Circuit Upholds Mid‑Cycle Redistricting and Treats “Vote Postponement” as Non-Disenfranchisement

Date: Nov 1, 2025
No Right to Vote on a Particular Schedule: The Fifth Circuit Upholds Mid‑Cycle Redistricting and Treats “Vote Postponement” as Non-Disenfranchisement Introduction In Jackson v. Tarrant County, the...
No End-Run Around Louisiana’s LHEPA: Plaintiffs Must Plausibly Plead Gross Negligence or Willful Misconduct—and Relabeling as Contract Won’t Avoid the Shield (Ware v. Irving Place, 5th Cir. 2025)

No End-Run Around Louisiana’s LHEPA: Plaintiffs Must Plausibly Plead Gross Negligence or Willful Misconduct—and Relabeling as Contract Won’t Avoid the Shield (Ware v. Irving Place, 5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
No End-Run Around Louisiana’s LHEPA: Plaintiffs Must Plausibly Plead Gross Negligence or Willful Misconduct—and Relabeling as Contract Won’t Avoid the Shield Ware v. Irving Place (5th Cir. Oct. 29,...
Belknap v. Spinks: Clearly Established Bar on Housing Known‑Suicidal Detainees with Loose Bedding and Tie‑Off Points; No Deliberate‑Indifference Claim for Failure to Render Aid Absent Belief of Rescuability

Belknap v. Spinks: Clearly Established Bar on Housing Known‑Suicidal Detainees with Loose Bedding and Tie‑Off Points; No Deliberate‑Indifference Claim for Failure to Render Aid Absent Belief of Rescuability

Date: Oct 31, 2025
Belknap v. Spinks: Clearly Established Bar on Housing Known‑Suicidal Detainees with Loose Bedding and Tie‑Off Points; No Deliberate‑Indifference Claim for Failure to Render Aid Absent Belief of...
Manageable Lines and Cost Causation: Fifth Circuit Clarifies NEPA Scope and Predeterminations under the Natural Gas Act

Manageable Lines and Cost Causation: Fifth Circuit Clarifies NEPA Scope and Predeterminations under the Natural Gas Act

Date: Oct 31, 2025
Manageable Lines and Cost Causation: Fifth Circuit Clarifies NEPA Scope and Predeterminations under the Natural Gas Act Introduction In Columbia Riverkeeper v. FERC, Nos. 24-60002, 24-60197,...
Managing NEPA’s “Manageable Line” and Immediate Review of FERC Predetermination Denials: The Fifth Circuit’s Framework in Gas Transmission NW v. FERC

Managing NEPA’s “Manageable Line” and Immediate Review of FERC Predetermination Denials: The Fifth Circuit’s Framework in Gas Transmission NW v. FERC

Date: Oct 31, 2025
Managing NEPA’s “Manageable Line” and Immediate Review of FERC Predetermination Denials: The Fifth Circuit’s Framework in Gas Transmission NW v. FERC Introduction In Gas Transmission NW v. FERC (5th...
No Presumption of Rolled‑In Rates for Oversized § 2.55(b) Replacements; Fifth Circuit Endorses FERC’s “Manageable Line” NEPA Scope After Seven County

No Presumption of Rolled‑In Rates for Oversized § 2.55(b) Replacements; Fifth Circuit Endorses FERC’s “Manageable Line” NEPA Scope After Seven County

Date: Oct 31, 2025
No Presumption of Rolled‑In Rates for Oversized § 2.55(b) Replacements; Fifth Circuit Endorses FERC’s “Manageable Line” NEPA Scope After Seven County Introduction This consolidated Fifth Circuit...
Church Autonomy as Structural Immunity—Not Rule 12(b)(1)—and Its Application to Non‑Hierarchical Ministries and Third‑Party Interference: Commentary on McRaney v. North American Mission Board (5th Cir. Oct. 28, 2025)

Church Autonomy as Structural Immunity—Not Rule 12(b)(1)—and Its Application to Non‑Hierarchical Ministries and Third‑Party Interference: Commentary on McRaney v. North American Mission Board (5th Cir. Oct. 28, 2025)

Date: Oct 31, 2025
Church Autonomy as Structural Immunity—Not Rule 12(b)(1)—and Its Application to Non‑Hierarchical Ministries and Third‑Party Interference: Commentary on McRaney v. North American Mission Board (5th...
CTR-Compliance Delays Are Not § 1981 Contract Impairment; Unpreserved Qualified-Immunity Challenges Reviewed Only for Plain Error — Randle v. PNC Financial (5th Cir. 2025)

CTR-Compliance Delays Are Not § 1981 Contract Impairment; Unpreserved Qualified-Immunity Challenges Reviewed Only for Plain Error — Randle v. PNC Financial (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 31, 2025
CTR-Compliance Delays Are Not § 1981 Contract Impairment; Unpreserved Qualified-Immunity Challenges Reviewed Only for Plain Error — Randle v. PNC Financial (5th Cir. 2025) Court: United States Court...
NEPA’s “Manageable Line,” § 2.55(b) Replacements, and Rolled‑In Rate Predeterminations: The Fifth Circuit’s Framework in State of Washington v. FERC (GTN Xpress)

NEPA’s “Manageable Line,” § 2.55(b) Replacements, and Rolled‑In Rate Predeterminations: The Fifth Circuit’s Framework in State of Washington v. FERC (GTN Xpress)

Date: Oct 31, 2025
NEPA’s “Manageable Line,” § 2.55(b) Replacements, and Rolled‑In Rate Predeterminations: The Fifth Circuit’s Framework in State of Washington v. FERC (GTN Xpress) Introduction In State of Washington...
Fifth Circuit Holds § 2422(b) “Sexual Activity” Includes Nonphysical Conduct, Affirming Attempted Coercion to Produce Lascivious Images

Fifth Circuit Holds § 2422(b) “Sexual Activity” Includes Nonphysical Conduct, Affirming Attempted Coercion to Produce Lascivious Images

Date: Oct 31, 2025
Fifth Circuit Holds § 2422(b) “Sexual Activity” Includes Nonphysical Conduct, Affirming Attempted Coercion to Produce Lascivious Images Introduction United States v. Jimenez, No. 24-40703 (5th Cir....
United States v. Hernandez-Adame: Fifth Circuit Confirms that “Entry” Under § 1326 Requires Freedom from Official Restraint, but Treats It as a Definitional Concept Within Trial Courts’ Instructional Discretion

United States v. Hernandez-Adame: Fifth Circuit Confirms that “Entry” Under § 1326 Requires Freedom from Official Restraint, but Treats It as a Definitional Concept Within Trial Courts’ Instructional Discretion

Date: Oct 28, 2025
United States v. Hernandez-Adame: Fifth Circuit Confirms that “Entry” Under § 1326 Requires Freedom from Official Restraint, but Treats It as a Definitional Concept Within Trial Courts’ Instructional...
Hermann Estoppel Revived and Provider Assignments Clarified: The Fifth Circuit’s Framework for Out‑of‑Network ERISA Claims in Angelina Emergency Med. v. Blue Cross

Hermann Estoppel Revived and Provider Assignments Clarified: The Fifth Circuit’s Framework for Out‑of‑Network ERISA Claims in Angelina Emergency Med. v. Blue Cross

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Hermann Estoppel Revived and Provider Assignments Clarified: The Fifth Circuit’s Framework for Out‑of‑Network ERISA Claims in Angelina Emergency Med. v. Blue Cross Introduction In Angelina Emergency...
No Statutory Lanham Act Damages Without a Registered Mark: Fifth Circuit Vacates Awards and Clarifies Limits on Attorney Immunity in Lewis Brisbois v. Bitgood

No Statutory Lanham Act Damages Without a Registered Mark: Fifth Circuit Vacates Awards and Clarifies Limits on Attorney Immunity in Lewis Brisbois v. Bitgood

Date: Oct 27, 2025
No Statutory Lanham Act Damages Without a Registered Mark: Fifth Circuit Vacates Awards and Clarifies Limits on Attorney Immunity in Lewis Brisbois v. Bitgood Introduction In an unpublished but...
No Post‑Termination Royalties Absent Express Language: “Developed and Manufactured During the Initial Term” Means What It Says

No Post‑Termination Royalties Absent Express Language: “Developed and Manufactured During the Initial Term” Means What It Says

Date: Oct 27, 2025
No Post‑Termination Royalties Absent Express Language: “Developed and Manufactured During the Initial Term” Means What It Says Case: Strategy and Execution, Inc. v. Black Rifle Coffee Company,...
Arzamendi v. Hegseth: Rescission of Federal Vaccine Mandate Does Not Moot Damages Claims; Religious Accommodation Pleadings Must Specifically Tie Beliefs to Testing/Masking Protocols

Arzamendi v. Hegseth: Rescission of Federal Vaccine Mandate Does Not Moot Damages Claims; Religious Accommodation Pleadings Must Specifically Tie Beliefs to Testing/Masking Protocols

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Arzamendi v. Hegseth: Rescission of Federal Vaccine Mandate Does Not Moot Damages Claims; Religious Accommodation Pleadings Must Specifically Tie Beliefs to Testing/Masking Protocols Introduction In...
Survival Clauses Cannot Create Post‑Termination Renewal Commission Rights Under Maryland Law: Sims Agency v. GEICO (5th Cir. 2025)

Survival Clauses Cannot Create Post‑Termination Renewal Commission Rights Under Maryland Law: Sims Agency v. GEICO (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Survival Clauses Cannot Create Post‑Termination Renewal Commission Rights Under Maryland Law: Sims Agency v. GEICO (5th Cir. 2025) Introduction In Sims Agency, L.L.C. v. Government Employees...
Torres v. Rubio: § 1503(a) Citizenship Suits Are De Novo and Not Bound by Passport “Primary/Secondary Evidence” Regulations

Torres v. Rubio: § 1503(a) Citizenship Suits Are De Novo and Not Bound by Passport “Primary/Secondary Evidence” Regulations

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Torres v. Rubio: § 1503(a) Citizenship Suits Are De Novo and Not Bound by Passport “Primary/Secondary Evidence” Regulations Introduction In Torres v. Rubio, No. 24-40685 (5th Cir. Oct. 21, 2025)...
Pattern-of-Coercion Suffices for § 1591; Social-Media “Pimping” Memes Are Admissible Under Rule 404(b): A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Lewis (5th Cir. 2025)

Pattern-of-Coercion Suffices for § 1591; Social-Media “Pimping” Memes Are Admissible Under Rule 404(b): A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Lewis (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Pattern-of-Coercion Suffices for § 1591; Social-Media “Pimping” Memes Are Admissible Under Rule 404(b) Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Lewis, No. 24-20235 (5th Cir. Oct. 21, 2025)...
Colorado River Controls Mixed Declaratory/Injunctive Actions; “Ready, Willing, and Able” for Texas Equitable Redemption Requires Conjunctive Proof: Commentary on All About Property, L.L.C. v. Midland Mortgage (5th Cir. 2025)

Colorado River Controls Mixed Declaratory/Injunctive Actions; “Ready, Willing, and Able” for Texas Equitable Redemption Requires Conjunctive Proof: Commentary on All About Property, L.L.C. v. Midland Mortgage (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 23, 2025
Colorado River Controls Mixed Declaratory/Injunctive Actions; “Ready, Willing, and Able” for Texas Equitable Redemption Requires Conjunctive Proof: Commentary on All About Property, L.L.C. v. Midland...
Contractual Pre‑Suit ADR Can Trigger a CGL “Duty to Defend,” and Wrongful Denial Waives Consent-to-ADR; Bankruptcy Assignment Does Not Bar Indemnity Litigation

Contractual Pre‑Suit ADR Can Trigger a CGL “Duty to Defend,” and Wrongful Denial Waives Consent-to-ADR; Bankruptcy Assignment Does Not Bar Indemnity Litigation

Date: Oct 23, 2025
Contractual Pre‑Suit ADR Can Trigger a CGL “Duty to Defend,” and Wrongful Denial Waives Consent-to-ADR; Bankruptcy Assignment Does Not Bar Indemnity Litigation Case: BPX Prod. Co. v. Certain...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert