Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Sixth Circuit: Kentucky Wanton Second-Degree Manslaughter Is Not a “Crime of Violence” Under the Guidelines; Misclassification Is Plain Error (United States v. Tooley)

Sixth Circuit: Kentucky Wanton Second-Degree Manslaughter Is Not a “Crime of Violence” Under the Guidelines; Misclassification Is Plain Error (United States v. Tooley)

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Sixth Circuit: Kentucky Wanton Second-Degree Manslaughter Is Not a “Crime of Violence” Under the Guidelines; Misclassification Is Plain Error Introduction In United States v. Tooley, the Sixth...
Enforcing Neutral Medical-Clearance Policies as a Legitimate Non-Discriminatory Basis: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Highlights Proof Requirements for Hostile Environment and Retaliation

Enforcing Neutral Medical-Clearance Policies as a Legitimate Non-Discriminatory Basis: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Highlights Proof Requirements for Hostile Environment and Retaliation

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Enforcing Neutral Medical-Clearance Policies as a Legitimate Non-Discriminatory Basis: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Highlights Proof Requirements for Hostile Environment and Retaliation...
Ethnic Modifiers Do Not Salvage Circular Particular Social Groups, and Nexus Cannot Be Inferred from Population-Level Disparities: Commentary on Macario‑Tzoc v. Bondi (6th Cir. 2025)

Ethnic Modifiers Do Not Salvage Circular Particular Social Groups, and Nexus Cannot Be Inferred from Population-Level Disparities: Commentary on Macario‑Tzoc v. Bondi (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Ethnic Modifiers Do Not Salvage Circular Particular Social Groups, and Nexus Cannot Be Inferred from Population‑Level Disparities: Commentary on Macario‑Tzoc v. Bondi (6th Cir. 2025) Court: U.S....
Accessibility and Temporal Proximity Satisfy “During the Offense” for § 2D1.1(b)(1) Firearm Enhancement

Accessibility and Temporal Proximity Satisfy “During the Offense” for § 2D1.1(b)(1) Firearm Enhancement

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Accessibility and Temporal Proximity Satisfy “During the Offense” for § 2D1.1(b)(1) Firearm Enhancement Introduction In United States v. Byron Metcalf-Burroughs (No. 24-1944, 6th Cir. Oct. 22, 2025)...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Discretion to Deny Time‑Served Variances Without “Magic Words” and to Avoid Double Credit

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Discretion to Deny Time‑Served Variances Without “Magic Words” and to Avoid Double Credit

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Discretion to Deny Time‑Served Variances Without “Magic Words” and to Avoid Double Credit Introduction In United States v. Lawrence Edward Slaughter, II (6th Cir. Oct. 22,...
Operationalizing Williams: Gang-Related Gun Lending and Repeat Firearm Offenses Establish “Dangerousness” in § 922(g)(1) As‑Applied Challenges

Operationalizing Williams: Gang-Related Gun Lending and Repeat Firearm Offenses Establish “Dangerousness” in § 922(g)(1) As‑Applied Challenges

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Operationalizing Williams: Gang-Related Gun Lending and Repeat Firearm Offenses Establish “Dangerousness” in § 922(g)(1) As‑Applied Challenges Case: United States v. William Lee Suggs, IV, No....
Sixth Circuit Forecloses Merits-Panel Expansion of COAs and Distinguishes Katz and Jones as Separate, Exhaustion-Required Fourth Amendment Theories

Sixth Circuit Forecloses Merits-Panel Expansion of COAs and Distinguishes Katz and Jones as Separate, Exhaustion-Required Fourth Amendment Theories

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Sixth Circuit Forecloses Merits-Panel Expansion of COAs and Distinguishes Katz and Jones as Separate, Exhaustion-Required Fourth Amendment Theories Introduction In a published decision with...
Clarifying Securities Pleading: Judicial Notice of Third‑Party Public Statements and Form 4s Permitted; Puffery/Forward‑Looking Optimism Not Actionable Absent Specific Contrary Facts

Clarifying Securities Pleading: Judicial Notice of Third‑Party Public Statements and Form 4s Permitted; Puffery/Forward‑Looking Optimism Not Actionable Absent Specific Contrary Facts

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Clarifying Securities Pleading: Judicial Notice of Third‑Party Public Statements and Form 4s Permitted; Puffery/Forward‑Looking Optimism Not Actionable Absent Specific Contrary Facts Case: Bandol Lim...
Pleading Matters in Title VII/ELCRA: Sixth Circuit Rejects Conclusory Race and Retaliation Claims; Protected Activity Requires a Race-Based Complaint and Leave to Amend Must Be Properly Sought

Pleading Matters in Title VII/ELCRA: Sixth Circuit Rejects Conclusory Race and Retaliation Claims; Protected Activity Requires a Race-Based Complaint and Leave to Amend Must Be Properly Sought

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Pleading Matters in Title VII/ELCRA: Sixth Circuit Rejects Conclusory Race and Retaliation Claims; Protected Activity Requires a Race-Based Complaint and Leave to Amend Must Be Properly Sought...
Integrated Commission Agreements Foreclose Unjust Enrichment for Related Revenue Streams at the Pleading Stage: Mosser v. Cramer‑Krasselt (6th Cir. 2025)

Integrated Commission Agreements Foreclose Unjust Enrichment for Related Revenue Streams at the Pleading Stage: Mosser v. Cramer‑Krasselt (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Integrated Commission Agreements Foreclose Unjust Enrichment for Related Revenue Streams at the Pleading Stage Mosser v. Cramer‑Krasselt Co. (6th Cir. Oct. 21, 2025) Introduction In this unpublished...
Post-Esteras Clarification: Consecutive Revocation Terms May Rest on Breach of Trust; Appeal Waiver in Rule 11(c)(1)(C) Plea Forecloses Reasonableness Attack on a Within-Range Sentence

Post-Esteras Clarification: Consecutive Revocation Terms May Rest on Breach of Trust; Appeal Waiver in Rule 11(c)(1)(C) Plea Forecloses Reasonableness Attack on a Within-Range Sentence

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Post-Esteras Clarification: Consecutive Revocation Terms May Rest on Breach of Trust; Appeal Waiver in Rule 11(c)(1)(C) Plea Forecloses Reasonableness Attack on a Within-Range Sentence Introduction...
Breach of Trust, Not Retribution: Sixth Circuit Affirms Consecutive Max Revocation Terms and Enforces Range-Based Appeal Waivers Post-Esteras

Breach of Trust, Not Retribution: Sixth Circuit Affirms Consecutive Max Revocation Terms and Enforces Range-Based Appeal Waivers Post-Esteras

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Breach of Trust, Not Retribution: Sixth Circuit Affirms Consecutive Max Revocation Terms and Enforces Range-Based Appeal Waivers Post-Esteras Introduction In United States v. Charles Henry Milton,...
United States v. Webster: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms a Stronger Presumption of Substantive Reasonableness for Below‑Guidelines Sentences and Treats Remote-Control Manipulation as “Hands‑On” Abuse for § 3553(a)

United States v. Webster: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms a Stronger Presumption of Substantive Reasonableness for Below‑Guidelines Sentences and Treats Remote-Control Manipulation as “Hands‑On” Abuse for § 3553(a)

Date: Oct 24, 2025
United States v. Webster: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms a Stronger Presumption of Substantive Reasonableness for Below‑Guidelines Sentences and Treats Remote-Control Manipulation as “Hands‑On” Abuse for §...
Exigent Circumstances Permit Warrantless Real‑Time CSLI During Ongoing Bomb Threats; Overinclusive Rule 404(b) Instruction Not Plain Error — United States v. Mubarak (6th Cir. 2025)

Exigent Circumstances Permit Warrantless Real‑Time CSLI During Ongoing Bomb Threats; Overinclusive Rule 404(b) Instruction Not Plain Error — United States v. Mubarak (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Exigent Circumstances Permit Warrantless Real‑Time CSLI During Ongoing Bomb Threats; Overinclusive Rule 404(b) Instruction Not Plain Error — United States v. Mubarak (6th Cir. 2025) Court: United...
No Probable Cause by Association: Sixth Circuit Limits Early Qualified Immunity Dismissals and Rejects Extra‑Record Evidence at Rule 12

No Probable Cause by Association: Sixth Circuit Limits Early Qualified Immunity Dismissals and Rejects Extra‑Record Evidence at Rule 12

Date: Oct 22, 2025
No Probable Cause by Association: Sixth Circuit Limits Early Qualified Immunity Dismissals and Rejects Extra‑Record Evidence at Rule 12 Case: Andrew Evans v. Mark Gordon, et al. (Nos. 24-2066/2094,...
Sixth Circuit Reaffirms: No Pleading-Stage Qualified Immunity When Complaint Plausibly Alleges Arrest Without Probable Cause; 12(b)(6) Cannot Be Converted into Summary Judgment

Sixth Circuit Reaffirms: No Pleading-Stage Qualified Immunity When Complaint Plausibly Alleges Arrest Without Probable Cause; 12(b)(6) Cannot Be Converted into Summary Judgment

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Sixth Circuit Reaffirms: No Pleading-Stage Qualified Immunity When Complaint Plausibly Alleges Arrest Without Probable Cause; 12(b)(6) Cannot Be Converted into Summary Judgment Introduction In Andrew...
Cumulative Inconsistencies Sustain Adverse Credibility; General Country Reports Alone Cannot Support CAT Relief: The Sixth Circuit’s Unpublished Decision in Md. Sundor Ali v. Bondi

Cumulative Inconsistencies Sustain Adverse Credibility; General Country Reports Alone Cannot Support CAT Relief: The Sixth Circuit’s Unpublished Decision in Md. Sundor Ali v. Bondi

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Cumulative Inconsistencies Sustain Adverse Credibility; General Country Reports Alone Cannot Support CAT Relief Introduction In Md. Sundor Ali v. Bondi, No. 24-3867 (6th Cir. Oct. 20, 2025) (not...
Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Tennessee’s Locality Rule and Permits Sua Sponte Summary Judgment After Expert Exclusion: Lenoir v. Shelby County Health Care Corp.

Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Tennessee’s Locality Rule and Permits Sua Sponte Summary Judgment After Expert Exclusion: Lenoir v. Shelby County Health Care Corp.

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Tennessee’s Locality Rule and Permits Sua Sponte Summary Judgment After Expert Exclusion Lenoir v. Shelby County Health Care Corporation (d/b/a Regional One Health) Court:...
Retaliatory-Intent Upward Variances and Digital Constructive Possession Under § 922(g): United States v. Andrew Miller

Retaliatory-Intent Upward Variances and Digital Constructive Possession Under § 922(g): United States v. Andrew Miller

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Retaliatory-Intent Upward Variances and Digital Constructive Possession Under § 922(g): United States v. Andrew Miller Introduction This Sixth Circuit decision, though designated “Not Recommended for...
Sixth Circuit clarifies post-Ruan mens rea and upholds deliberate-ignorance instructions for pharmacists under § 841: United States v. Hasna Bashir Iwas

Sixth Circuit clarifies post-Ruan mens rea and upholds deliberate-ignorance instructions for pharmacists under § 841: United States v. Hasna Bashir Iwas

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Sixth Circuit clarifies post-Ruan mens rea and upholds deliberate-ignorance instructions for pharmacists under § 841 Commentary on United States v. Hasna Bashir Iwas, No. 24-1234 (6th Cir. Oct. 20,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert