Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Post-Wilkinson Deferential Review and the Mitigating Role of Family Assets in “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Analyses

Post-Wilkinson Deferential Review and the Mitigating Role of Family Assets in “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Analyses

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Post-Wilkinson Deferential Review and the Mitigating Role of Family Assets in “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Analyses Introduction This commentary examines the Sixth Circuit’s...
Agency Rescission and State-Law Interdependence Moot APA Challenges: The Sixth Circuit’s Refined Voluntary-Cessation Analysis in Gun Owners of America, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice

Agency Rescission and State-Law Interdependence Moot APA Challenges: The Sixth Circuit’s Refined Voluntary-Cessation Analysis in Gun Owners of America, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Agency Rescission and State-Law Interdependence Moot APA Challenges: The Sixth Circuit’s Refined Voluntary-Cessation Analysis in Gun Owners of America, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice Introduction...
Light-Duty Requests Are Protected ADA Activity, But Medical Proof and Comparator Evidence Remain Essential: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Moore v. Next Generation Hospitality

Light-Duty Requests Are Protected ADA Activity, But Medical Proof and Comparator Evidence Remain Essential: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Moore v. Next Generation Hospitality

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Light-Duty Requests Are Protected ADA Activity, But Medical Proof and Comparator Evidence Remain Essential Commentary on Demond Alex Moore v. Next Generation Hospitality LLC, No. 24-4050 (6th Cir....
Kemp did not open a “back door”: Sixth Circuit reaffirms that Rule 60(b)(1) cannot revive an untimely appeal caused by counsel’s misreading of finality and Rule 4

Kemp did not open a “back door”: Sixth Circuit reaffirms that Rule 60(b)(1) cannot revive an untimely appeal caused by counsel’s misreading of finality and Rule 4

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Kemp did not open a “back door”: Sixth Circuit reaffirms that Rule 60(b)(1) cannot revive an untimely appeal caused by counsel’s misreading of finality and Rule 4 Introduction This Sixth Circuit...
Logistics Control Equals Managerial Role: Sixth Circuit Affirms §3B1.1(c) Enhancement Based on Directing a Co-Participant Without Proof of Profit Share or Direct Communications

Logistics Control Equals Managerial Role: Sixth Circuit Affirms §3B1.1(c) Enhancement Based on Directing a Co-Participant Without Proof of Profit Share or Direct Communications

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Logistics Control Equals Managerial Role: Sixth Circuit Affirms §3B1.1(c) Enhancement Based on Directing a Co-Participant Without Proof of Profit Share or Direct Communications Introduction In United...
Victim Humiliation as a Non‑Guidelines Aggravator and Foreseeability-Based Firearm Enhancements in Carjackings: United States v. Haile (6th Cir. 2025)

Victim Humiliation as a Non‑Guidelines Aggravator and Foreseeability-Based Firearm Enhancements in Carjackings: United States v. Haile (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Victim Humiliation as a Non‑Guidelines Aggravator and Foreseeability-Based Firearm Enhancements in Carjackings: United States v. Haile (6th Cir. 2025) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Adequate Prison Care and § 3553(a) Balancing Can Defeat Compassionate Release Even for End-Stage Organ Disease: Commentary on United States v. Korey Moody (6th Cir. Oct. 29, 2025)

Adequate Prison Care and § 3553(a) Balancing Can Defeat Compassionate Release Even for End-Stage Organ Disease: Commentary on United States v. Korey Moody (6th Cir. Oct. 29, 2025)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Adequate Prison Care and § 3553(a) Balancing Can Defeat Compassionate Release Even for End-Stage Organ Disease Commentary on United States v. Korey Moody, No. 24-4095 (6th Cir. Oct. 29, 2025) (Not...
Simultaneous Miranda Warnings Are Valid If Reasonably Conveyed; Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Post‑Bruen Constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) and § 924(c), and Tightens Recantation-Based New Trial Relief

Simultaneous Miranda Warnings Are Valid If Reasonably Conveyed; Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Post‑Bruen Constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) and § 924(c), and Tightens Recantation-Based New Trial Relief

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Simultaneous Miranda Warnings Are Valid If Reasonably Conveyed; Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Post‑Bruen Constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) and § 924(c), and Tightens Recantation-Based New Trial Relief Case:...
Terse §3553(a) Explanations and Anticipated State Revocation Consecutive Orders: Sixth Circuit Affirms Sentencing Discretion Under Setser and U.S.S.G. §5G1.3(d)

Terse §3553(a) Explanations and Anticipated State Revocation Consecutive Orders: Sixth Circuit Affirms Sentencing Discretion Under Setser and U.S.S.G. §5G1.3(d)

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Terse §3553(a) Explanations and Anticipated State Revocation Consecutive Orders: Sixth Circuit Affirms Sentencing Discretion Under Setser and U.S.S.G. §5G1.3(d) Introduction In United States v....
Clear-Error Review Governs Threat-Based Obstruction Enhancements Under § 3C1.1; Corroborated, Present-Tense CI Tips Sustain Home Search Warrants

Clear-Error Review Governs Threat-Based Obstruction Enhancements Under § 3C1.1; Corroborated, Present-Tense CI Tips Sustain Home Search Warrants

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Clear-Error Review Governs Threat-Based Obstruction Enhancements Under § 3C1.1; Corroborated, Present-Tense CI Tips Sustain Home Search Warrants Introduction In United States v. Jarrett Howard (6th...
No Chevron Needed: DEA Registration Does Not Immunize Practitioners from § 841(a); Sixth Circuit Affirms Ruan Knowledge Can Be Proven Circumstantially in Pregnant-Patient Prescribing

No Chevron Needed: DEA Registration Does Not Immunize Practitioners from § 841(a); Sixth Circuit Affirms Ruan Knowledge Can Be Proven Circumstantially in Pregnant-Patient Prescribing

Date: Oct 30, 2025
No Chevron Needed: DEA Registration Does Not Immunize Practitioners from § 841(a); Sixth Circuit Affirms Ruan Knowledge Can Be Proven Circumstantially in Pregnant-Patient Prescribing Case: United...
No Federal Power to Compel Arbitration of Ongoing State Probate Asset Proceedings: The Sixth Circuit’s “Look‑Through plus In‑Rem” Bar under FAA § 4

No Federal Power to Compel Arbitration of Ongoing State Probate Asset Proceedings: The Sixth Circuit’s “Look‑Through plus In‑Rem” Bar under FAA § 4

Date: Oct 28, 2025
No Federal Power to Compel Arbitration of Ongoing State Probate Asset Proceedings: The Sixth Circuit’s “Look‑Through plus In‑Rem” Bar under FAA § 4 Introduction In Amos C. Johnson, M.D., and Johnson...
No Clearly Established Right of Public Access to Quasi‑Judicial Tax Hearings: Sixth Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity in Hicks v. Crowley

No Clearly Established Right of Public Access to Quasi‑Judicial Tax Hearings: Sixth Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity in Hicks v. Crowley

Date: Oct 28, 2025
No Clearly Established Right of Public Access to Quasi‑Judicial Tax Hearings: Sixth Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity in Hicks v. Crowley Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Date:...
Effective Preventive Measures Defeat Constructive Notice: Sixth Circuit Affirms No Duty Absent Foreseeability of a “General Condition” in Tennessee Premises Liability

Effective Preventive Measures Defeat Constructive Notice: Sixth Circuit Affirms No Duty Absent Foreseeability of a “General Condition” in Tennessee Premises Liability

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Effective Preventive Measures Defeat Constructive Notice: Sixth Circuit Affirms No Duty Absent Foreseeability of a “General Condition” in Tennessee Premises Liability Introduction In Patrick Penn &...
Kosher Complaints Must Follow Prison Verification Rules; Sporadic Errors Do Not Clearly Violate Free Exercise: Sixth Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity in Blanton v. Histed

Kosher Complaints Must Follow Prison Verification Rules; Sporadic Errors Do Not Clearly Violate Free Exercise: Sixth Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity in Blanton v. Histed

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Kosher Complaints Must Follow Prison Verification Rules; Sporadic Errors Do Not Clearly Violate Free Exercise: Sixth Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity in Blanton v. Histed Court: United States Court...
General Compliance Clauses Do Not Waive Tribal Sovereign Immunity: Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of FLSA Suit Against Tribally Owned Casino

General Compliance Clauses Do Not Waive Tribal Sovereign Immunity: Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of FLSA Suit Against Tribally Owned Casino

Date: Oct 27, 2025
General Compliance Clauses Do Not Waive Tribal Sovereign Immunity: Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of FLSA Suit Against Tribally Owned Casino Alexandria Parrotta v. Island Resort & Casino, No....
Undercover buyer’s export statement and contextual cues suffice for § 2K2.1(b)(6)(A): Sixth Circuit affirms export-enhancement, invited-error bar to acceptance-of-responsibility challenge, and within-Guidelines sentence in United States v. Darvell Jackson

Undercover buyer’s export statement and contextual cues suffice for § 2K2.1(b)(6)(A): Sixth Circuit affirms export-enhancement, invited-error bar to acceptance-of-responsibility challenge, and within-Guidelines sentence in United States v. Darvell Jackson

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Undercover buyer’s export statement and contextual cues suffice for § 2K2.1(b)(6)(A): Sixth Circuit affirms export-enhancement, invited-error bar to acceptance-of-responsibility challenge, and...
Sixth Circuit: Kentucky Wanton Second-Degree Manslaughter Is Not a “Crime of Violence” Under the Guidelines; Misclassification Is Plain Error (United States v. Tooley)

Sixth Circuit: Kentucky Wanton Second-Degree Manslaughter Is Not a “Crime of Violence” Under the Guidelines; Misclassification Is Plain Error (United States v. Tooley)

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Sixth Circuit: Kentucky Wanton Second-Degree Manslaughter Is Not a “Crime of Violence” Under the Guidelines; Misclassification Is Plain Error Introduction In United States v. Tooley, the Sixth...
Enforcing Neutral Medical-Clearance Policies as a Legitimate Non-Discriminatory Basis: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Highlights Proof Requirements for Hostile Environment and Retaliation

Enforcing Neutral Medical-Clearance Policies as a Legitimate Non-Discriminatory Basis: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Highlights Proof Requirements for Hostile Environment and Retaliation

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Enforcing Neutral Medical-Clearance Policies as a Legitimate Non-Discriminatory Basis: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Highlights Proof Requirements for Hostile Environment and Retaliation...
Ethnic Modifiers Do Not Salvage Circular Particular Social Groups, and Nexus Cannot Be Inferred from Population-Level Disparities: Commentary on Macario‑Tzoc v. Bondi (6th Cir. 2025)

Ethnic Modifiers Do Not Salvage Circular Particular Social Groups, and Nexus Cannot Be Inferred from Population-Level Disparities: Commentary on Macario‑Tzoc v. Bondi (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Ethnic Modifiers Do Not Salvage Circular Particular Social Groups, and Nexus Cannot Be Inferred from Population‑Level Disparities: Commentary on Macario‑Tzoc v. Bondi (6th Cir. 2025) Court: U.S....
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert