Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Alaska Case Commentaries

Personal-Use Harvest Is Not “Commerce”: Evenhanded Conservation Closures Upheld Against Dormant Commerce Clause Challenge

Personal-Use Harvest Is Not “Commerce”: Evenhanded Conservation Closures Upheld Against Dormant Commerce Clause Challenge

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Personal-Use Harvest Is Not “Commerce”: Evenhanded Conservation Closures Upheld Against Dormant Commerce Clause Challenge Case: Cook Inlet Fisherman’s Fund v. Alaska Department of Fish & Game, Alaska...
Mere Situs Is Not “Use” Under Florida UM Coverage: Alaska Supreme Court (Mem. Op.) Affirms No Coverage for Fireworks Injury Launched From a Stationary, Uninsured Trailer

Mere Situs Is Not “Use” Under Florida UM Coverage: Alaska Supreme Court (Mem. Op.) Affirms No Coverage for Fireworks Injury Launched From a Stationary, Uninsured Trailer

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Mere Situs Is Not “Use” Under Florida UM Coverage: Alaska Supreme Court (Mem. Op.) Affirms No Coverage for Fireworks Injury Launched From a Stationary, Uninsured Trailer Case: Walter M. Elrod and...
Immediate Means Immediate: Facility Refusals Count as State Capacity in Alaska’s Pre‑Evaluation Detention — In re Hospitalization of Tavis J. (Alaska 2025)

Immediate Means Immediate: Facility Refusals Count as State Capacity in Alaska’s Pre‑Evaluation Detention — In re Hospitalization of Tavis J. (Alaska 2025)

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Immediate Means Immediate: Facility Refusals Count as State Capacity in Alaska’s Pre‑Evaluation Detention — In re Hospitalization of Tavis J. (Alaska 2025) Introduction In In the Matter of the...
Forrer v. State of Alaska: Broad “Sustained Yield” Challenges Are Nonjusticiable; Plaintiffs Must Target Specific Agency Actions

Forrer v. State of Alaska: Broad “Sustained Yield” Challenges Are Nonjusticiable; Plaintiffs Must Target Specific Agency Actions

Date: Oct 13, 2025
Forrer v. State of Alaska: Broad “Sustained Yield” Challenges Are Nonjusticiable; Plaintiffs Must Target Specific Agency Actions Introduction In Forrer v. State of Alaska (Alaska Supreme Court No....
Expedited APOC Hearings Are Not Final: Alaska Supreme Court Upholds Post‑Hearing Subpoenas and Rejects Res Judicata and Due Process Challenges

Expedited APOC Hearings Are Not Final: Alaska Supreme Court Upholds Post‑Hearing Subpoenas and Rejects Res Judicata and Due Process Challenges

Date: Oct 13, 2025
Expedited APOC Hearings Are Not Final: Alaska Supreme Court Upholds Post‑Hearing Subpoenas and Rejects Res Judicata and Due Process Challenges Case: Republican Governors Association; A Stronger...
Enforcing Separation Agreements in Alaska: Capacity, Duress, and Unconscionability as Gatekeepers to Unequal Property Divisions

Enforcing Separation Agreements in Alaska: Capacity, Duress, and Unconscionability as Gatekeepers to Unequal Property Divisions

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Enforcing Separation Agreements in Alaska: Capacity, Duress, and Unconscionability as Gatekeepers to Unequal Property Divisions Case: Burton Haviland Jr. v. Kimberly Haviland Court: Supreme Court of...
Active Efforts Under ICWA During Pretrial Incarceration: Relative Placement and Tribal Engagement Can Satisfy the Standard

Active Efforts Under ICWA During Pretrial Incarceration: Relative Placement and Tribal Engagement Can Satisfy the Standard

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Active Efforts Under ICWA During Pretrial Incarceration: Relative Placement and Tribal Engagement Can Satisfy the Standard Introduction In Enzo C. v. State, DFCS, OCS, the Alaska Supreme Court...
Reaffirming Hearing Requirements for Rule 11 Sanctions and Mandatory AS 25.20.115 Findings; Written Orders Control “Shared Physical Custody” Under Rule 90.3

Reaffirming Hearing Requirements for Rule 11 Sanctions and Mandatory AS 25.20.115 Findings; Written Orders Control “Shared Physical Custody” Under Rule 90.3

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Reaffirming Hearing Requirements for Rule 11 Sanctions and Mandatory AS 25.20.115 Findings; Written Orders Control “Shared Physical Custody” Under Rule 90.3 Note: This is a memorandum opinion and...
Holistic “Active Efforts” Under ICWA and the Effect of Parental Disappearance: Roger S. v. State of Alaska (Memorandum Opinion, Oct. 8, 2025)

Holistic “Active Efforts” Under ICWA and the Effect of Parental Disappearance: Roger S. v. State of Alaska (Memorandum Opinion, Oct. 8, 2025)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Holistic “Active Efforts” Under ICWA and the Effect of Parental Disappearance: Roger S. v. State of Alaska (Memorandum Opinion, Oct. 8, 2025) Note on precedential status: This is a memorandum opinion...
Prejudgment Interest Must Be Netted Against Interim Distributions When a Marital Business Is Awarded as of the Separation Date

Prejudgment Interest Must Be Netted Against Interim Distributions When a Marital Business Is Awarded as of the Separation Date

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Prejudgment Interest Must Be Netted Against Interim Distributions When a Marital Business Is Awarded as of the Separation Date Case: Ryan A. Johnston v. Tiffany G. Adkins f/k/a Tiffany G. Johnston;...
Consent Decree Dissolution Does Not Terminate Divestment Contracts: Alaska Supreme Court Clarifies Contract Survival and Permissive Intervention in ARTA Enforcement

Consent Decree Dissolution Does Not Terminate Divestment Contracts: Alaska Supreme Court Clarifies Contract Survival and Permissive Intervention in ARTA Enforcement

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Consent Decree Dissolution Does Not Terminate Divestment Contracts: Alaska Supreme Court Clarifies Contract Survival and Permissive Intervention in ARTA Enforcement Court: Supreme Court of the State...
The “Probate Gap” and URLTA in Alaska: Reasonableness of Estate Mitigation, Non‑Willful Deposit Withholding, and Full Fee Recovery for Prevailing Landlords

The “Probate Gap” and URLTA in Alaska: Reasonableness of Estate Mitigation, Non‑Willful Deposit Withholding, and Full Fee Recovery for Prevailing Landlords

Date: Oct 2, 2025
The “Probate Gap” and URLTA in Alaska: Reasonableness of Estate Mitigation, Non‑Willful Deposit Withholding, and Full Fee Recovery for Prevailing Landlords Court: Supreme Court of the State of Alaska...
Agencies May Repeal What They Can Enact: Alaska Supreme Court Affirms ADF&G Commissioner’s Implied and Delegated Authority Over Critical Habitat “Compatibility”

Agencies May Repeal What They Can Enact: Alaska Supreme Court Affirms ADF&G Commissioner’s Implied and Delegated Authority Over Critical Habitat “Compatibility”

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Agencies May Repeal What They Can Enact: Alaska Supreme Court Affirms ADF&G Commissioner’s Implied and Delegated Authority Over Critical Habitat “Compatibility” Introduction In State of Alaska...
Alaska Supreme Court Clarifies ICWA: No “Active Efforts” Duty to Extended Family in Post-Removal Placement Requests

Alaska Supreme Court Clarifies ICWA: No “Active Efforts” Duty to Extended Family in Post-Removal Placement Requests

Date: Sep 27, 2025
ICWA’s “Active Efforts” Focus on Parents and Indian Custodians, Not Extended Family: Alaska Supreme Court’s Decision in Betsy F. v. State (No. 7789, Sept. 26, 2025) Introduction In a decision of...
Constructive Discharge in Alaska Whistleblower Cases Is an Objective, Position-Specific Inquiry (Nonprecedential Clarification)

Constructive Discharge in Alaska Whistleblower Cases Is an Objective, Position-Specific Inquiry (Nonprecedential Clarification)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Constructive Discharge in Alaska Whistleblower Cases Is an Objective, Position-Specific Inquiry (Nonprecedential Clarification) Court: Supreme Court of the State of Alaska (Memorandum Opinion and...
Recent Compliance Is Not Enough: Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Termination Where Change Is Unproven Outside Structured Settings; “Reasonable Efforts” Do Not Require Early Neuropsychological Referral Absent Indicators

Recent Compliance Is Not Enough: Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Termination Where Change Is Unproven Outside Structured Settings; “Reasonable Efforts” Do Not Require Early Neuropsychological Referral Absent Indicators

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Recent Compliance Is Not Enough: Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Termination Where Change Is Unproven Outside Structured Settings; “Reasonable Efforts” Do Not Require Early Neuropsychological Referral...
UTPA Administrative Subpoenas in Alaska: Probable Cause Not Required; Anonymous Tip With Corroboration Suffices To Support Attorney General’s Subpoena

UTPA Administrative Subpoenas in Alaska: Probable Cause Not Required; Anonymous Tip With Corroboration Suffices To Support Attorney General’s Subpoena

Date: Sep 8, 2025
UTPA Administrative Subpoenas in Alaska: Probable Cause Not Required; Anonymous Tip With Corroboration Suffices To Support Attorney General’s Subpoena Case: Business Doe, LLC v. State of Alaska, No....
Failure-to-Remedy Findings Are Sufficient When the Basis Is Discernible from the Order as a Whole: Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Termination of Parental Rights

Failure-to-Remedy Findings Are Sufficient When the Basis Is Discernible from the Order as a Whole: Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Termination of Parental Rights

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Failure-to-Remedy Findings Are Sufficient When the Basis Is Discernible from the Order as a Whole Case: Alana M. (Mother) v. State of Alaska, Department of Family & Community Services, Office of...
No Custody Fee Award Without Explicit AS 25.20.115 Findings; Rule 77(j) Sanctions Run Against Counsel, Not Parties — Commentary on Wallace v. O’Hara (Alaska 2025)

No Custody Fee Award Without Explicit AS 25.20.115 Findings; Rule 77(j) Sanctions Run Against Counsel, Not Parties — Commentary on Wallace v. O’Hara (Alaska 2025)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No Custody Fee Award Without Explicit AS 25.20.115 Findings; Rule 77(j) Sanctions Run Against Counsel, Not Parties Case: Amye Wallace v. John O’Hara, Supreme Court of the State of Alaska, No. S-19241...
No Due Process Violation from Extensive Representation Hearings; “Reasonable Efforts” Satisfied Despite Parental Noncooperation — Commentary on R.G. (Father) v. State of Alaska, DFCS/OCS

No Due Process Violation from Extensive Representation Hearings; “Reasonable Efforts” Satisfied Despite Parental Noncooperation — Commentary on R.G. (Father) v. State of Alaska, DFCS/OCS

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No Due Process Violation from Extensive Representation Hearings; “Reasonable Efforts” Satisfied Despite Parental Noncooperation — Commentary on R.G. (Father) v. State of Alaska, DFCS/OCS Memorandum...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert