Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arkansas Case Commentaries

File-Stamp Omissions on Criminal Informations Are Non‑Jurisdictional and Do Not Support Habeas Relief

File-Stamp Omissions on Criminal Informations Are Non‑Jurisdictional and Do Not Support Habeas Relief

Date: Nov 1, 2025
File-Stamp Omissions on Criminal Informations Are Non‑Jurisdictional and Do Not Support Habeas Relief Case: Edward Lee Carter v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction, 2025 Ark. 168...
Article 5, § 1 Controls: Arkansas Supreme Court Invalidates County Initiative Filing Statutes and Bars “Carryover” Certification of Untimely Petitions

Article 5, § 1 Controls: Arkansas Supreme Court Invalidates County Initiative Filing Statutes and Bars “Carryover” Certification of Untimely Petitions

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Article 5, § 1 Controls: Arkansas Supreme Court Invalidates County Initiative Filing Statutes and Bars “Carryover” Certification of Untimely Petitions Introduction This commentary examines the...
Preservation Is Paramount: Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Rule 33.1 Applies to Sentence Enhancements and Specific Sufficiency Grounds

Preservation Is Paramount: Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Rule 33.1 Applies to Sentence Enhancements and Specific Sufficiency Grounds

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Preservation Is Paramount: Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Rule 33.1 Applies to Sentence Enhancements and Specific Sufficiency Grounds Introduction In Morgan Weatherford v. State of Arkansas, 2025...
No Ministerial Duty to Provide Free Transcripts: Arkansas Supreme Court Reaffirms “Compelling Need” and Limits Mandamus in Scott v. Sullivan, 2025 Ark. 152

No Ministerial Duty to Provide Free Transcripts: Arkansas Supreme Court Reaffirms “Compelling Need” and Limits Mandamus in Scott v. Sullivan, 2025 Ark. 152

Date: Oct 18, 2025
No Ministerial Duty to Provide Free Transcripts: Arkansas Supreme Court Reaffirms “Compelling Need” and Limits Mandamus in Scott v. Sullivan, 2025 Ark. 152 Introduction In Scott v. Sullivan, 2025...
Act III Evaluation Time and Joint Continuances Are Excludable for Speedy-Trial Calculations: Neal v. State (2025 Ark. 151) and the Boundaries of Ineffective Assistance in Arkansas

Act III Evaluation Time and Joint Continuances Are Excludable for Speedy-Trial Calculations: Neal v. State (2025 Ark. 151) and the Boundaries of Ineffective Assistance in Arkansas

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Act III Evaluation Time and Joint Continuances Are Excludable for Speedy-Trial Calculations: Neal v. State (2025 Ark. 151) and the Boundaries of Ineffective Assistance in Arkansas Introduction In...
Novel Constitutional Claims Will Not Be Resolved at the Preliminary‑Injunction Stage: Arkansas Supreme Court Reaffirms Status Quo and Deferential Review in Short‑Term Rental Zoning

Novel Constitutional Claims Will Not Be Resolved at the Preliminary‑Injunction Stage: Arkansas Supreme Court Reaffirms Status Quo and Deferential Review in Short‑Term Rental Zoning

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Novel Constitutional Claims Will Not Be Resolved at the Preliminary‑Injunction Stage: Arkansas Supreme Court Reaffirms Status Quo and Deferential Review in Short‑Term Rental Zoning Introduction In...
Unattested Crime Lab Autopsy Reports Are Inadmissible—But Error Can Be Harmless in Accomplice-Murder Cases: Fort v. State (2025 Ark. 148)

Unattested Crime Lab Autopsy Reports Are Inadmissible—But Error Can Be Harmless in Accomplice-Murder Cases: Fort v. State (2025 Ark. 148)

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Unattested Crime Lab Autopsy Reports Are Inadmissible—But Error Can Be Harmless in Accomplice-Murder Cases: Fort v. State (2025 Ark. 148) Court: Supreme Court of Arkansas Date: October 9, 2025...
Unattested State Crime Lab Autopsy Reports: Error, But Harmless Where Cause of Death Is Undisputed and Liability Is as an Accomplice — Commentary on Nathaniel Fort v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 148

Unattested State Crime Lab Autopsy Reports: Error, But Harmless Where Cause of Death Is Undisputed and Liability Is as an Accomplice — Commentary on Nathaniel Fort v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 148

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Unattested State Crime Lab Autopsy Reports: Error, But Harmless Where Cause of Death Is Undisputed and Liability Is as an Accomplice Introduction In Nathaniel Fort v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark....
Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds “Detriment to the Community” as a Valid Parole Denial Basis and Reemphasizes No Liberty Interest in Parole: Howerton v. McCastlain, 2025 Ark. 144

Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds “Detriment to the Community” as a Valid Parole Denial Basis and Reemphasizes No Liberty Interest in Parole: Howerton v. McCastlain, 2025 Ark. 144

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds “Detriment to the Community” as a Valid Parole Denial Basis and Reemphasizes No Liberty Interest in Parole Commentary on Howerton v. McCastlain, Chairman, Arkansas...
Coston v. State: Pretrial Addition of Same-Offense Counts Permissible Absent Unfair Surprise; No Presumed Prejudice Without a Continuance Request

Coston v. State: Pretrial Addition of Same-Offense Counts Permissible Absent Unfair Surprise; No Presumed Prejudice Without a Continuance Request

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Pretrial Addition of Same-Offense Counts Permissible Absent Unfair Surprise; No Presumed Prejudice Without a Continuance Request Introduction In William Coston v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 143...
Rule 33.1 Specificity Controls: Self-Defense Sufficiency Not Preserved by Intent-Only Motion; Figurative, Non‑Matching Threats Are Admissible to Prove Intent; 4‑3(a) Review Permitted on State’s Adverse‑Rulings List

Rule 33.1 Specificity Controls: Self-Defense Sufficiency Not Preserved by Intent-Only Motion; Figurative, Non‑Matching Threats Are Admissible to Prove Intent; 4‑3(a) Review Permitted on State’s Adverse‑Rulings List

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Rule 33.1 Specificity Controls: Self-Defense Sufficiency Not Preserved by Intent-Only Motion; Figurative, Non‑Matching Threats Are Admissible to Prove Intent; 4‑3(a) Review Permitted on State’s...
Stand-Your-Ground’s Initial-Aggressor Limit Clarified; Voir Dire on Lesser Burdens May Be Curtailed: Collins v. State, 2025 Ark. 137

Stand-Your-Ground’s Initial-Aggressor Limit Clarified; Voir Dire on Lesser Burdens May Be Curtailed: Collins v. State, 2025 Ark. 137

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Stand-Your-Ground’s Initial-Aggressor Limit Clarified; Voir Dire on Lesser Burdens May Be Curtailed: Collins v. State, 2025 Ark. 137 Introduction In Dylan Collins v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 137,...
Pleading Specific Conviction Dates Is Required to Overcome Sovereign Immunity in Arkansas Parole-Eligibility Challenges

Pleading Specific Conviction Dates Is Required to Overcome Sovereign Immunity in Arkansas Parole-Eligibility Challenges

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Pleading Specific Conviction Dates Is Required to Overcome Sovereign Immunity in Arkansas Parole-Eligibility Challenges Case: Jeremy Kennedy v. Arkansas Parole Board and Arkansas Division of...
Full Interview Recordings Can Cure Suppression-Hearing Playback Gaps: Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Record-Settlement Sufficiency and Reaffirms Purposeful-Discharge Mens Rea for Drive-By Capital Murder

Full Interview Recordings Can Cure Suppression-Hearing Playback Gaps: Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Record-Settlement Sufficiency and Reaffirms Purposeful-Discharge Mens Rea for Drive-By Capital Murder

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Full Interview Recordings Can Cure Suppression-Hearing Playback Gaps: Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Record-Settlement Sufficiency and Reaffirms Purposeful-Discharge Mens Rea for Drive-By Capital...
Vasquez v. State (2025 Ark. 134): Good-Faith Reliance on an Unrecorded Oral Nexus for a Cell-Phone Warrant; Character-Impeachment Missteps Held Harmless

Vasquez v. State (2025 Ark. 134): Good-Faith Reliance on an Unrecorded Oral Nexus for a Cell-Phone Warrant; Character-Impeachment Missteps Held Harmless

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Good-Faith Reliance on an Unrecorded Oral Nexus for a Cell-Phone Warrant; Character-Impeachment Missteps Held Harmless Case: Santiago Vasquez, Jr. v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 134 (Supreme Court...
Speed Alone Does Not Defeat Magistrate Neutrality; Multi-Day After-Hours Processing Is Not a Nighttime Search Under Rule 13.2(c)

Speed Alone Does Not Defeat Magistrate Neutrality; Multi-Day After-Hours Processing Is Not a Nighttime Search Under Rule 13.2(c)

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Speed Alone Does Not Defeat Magistrate Neutrality; Multi-Day After-Hours Processing Is Not a Nighttime Search Under Rule 13.2(c) Introduction In Timothy Clevenger v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 128...
Curative Instructions Suffice for Isolated, Inadvertent References to Prior Felony Status: Walker v. State (2025 Ark. 127)

Curative Instructions Suffice for Isolated, Inadvertent References to Prior Felony Status: Walker v. State (2025 Ark. 127)

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Curative Instructions Suffice for Isolated, Inadvertent References to Prior Felony Status: Walker v. State (2025 Ark. 127) Court: Supreme Court of Arkansas Date: September 11, 2025 Citation: 2025...
Rule 1.4 – Arkansas’s New Framework for the Immediate Interim Suspension of Judges Accused of “Serious Crime” or Other Conduct Endangering the Administration of Justice

Rule 1.4 – Arkansas’s New Framework for the Immediate Interim Suspension of Judges Accused of “Serious Crime” or Other Conduct Endangering the Administration of Justice

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Rule 1.4 – Arkansas’s New Framework for the Immediate Interim Suspension of Judges Accused of “Serious Crime” or Other Conduct Endangering the Administration of Justice Introduction On 12 June 2025,...
Eric Overton v. State of Arkansas: Uncorroborated Minor Testimony Sufficiency & Voir Dire Instruction Limits

Eric Overton v. State of Arkansas: Uncorroborated Minor Testimony Sufficiency & Voir Dire Instruction Limits

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Eric Overton v. State of Arkansas: Uncorroborated Minor Testimony Sufficiency & Voir Dire Instruction Limits Introduction This commentary analyzes the Supreme Court of Arkansas’s decision in Eric...
Amendment 33 Enforcement: Safeguarding Constitutional Boards’ Powers Against Usurpation

Amendment 33 Enforcement: Safeguarding Constitutional Boards’ Powers Against Usurpation

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Amendment 33 Enforcement: Safeguarding Constitutional Boards’ Powers Against Usurpation Introduction The Supreme Court of Arkansas’s decision in Sarah Sanders et al. v. Arkansas Board of Corrections...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert