Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Hawaii Case Commentaries

Notice, Not Mens Rea: Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Holds Indictments Need Not Plead a State of Mind for HRS § 706-660.1 Firearm Sentencing Enhancements

Notice, Not Mens Rea: Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Holds Indictments Need Not Plead a State of Mind for HRS § 706-660.1 Firearm Sentencing Enhancements

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Notice, Not Mens Rea: Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Holds Indictments Need Not Plead a State of Mind for HRS § 706-660.1 Firearm Sentencing Enhancements Case: State v. Smith, SCWC-21-0000504 Court: Supreme...
Fee-Shifting in HEPA Appeals: Private Attorney General Awards Against Developers; HRS § 607‑25(e)(1) Limited to Private Parties and Premature Absent Final Approval Determination

Fee-Shifting in HEPA Appeals: Private Attorney General Awards Against Developers; HRS § 607‑25(e)(1) Limited to Private Parties and Premature Absent Final Approval Determination

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Fee-Shifting in HEPA Appeals: Private Attorney General Awards Against Developers; HRS § 607‑25(e)(1) Limited to Private Parties and Premature Absent Final Approval Determination Introduction In this...
Nakoa III: Dual‑Check Standard for Emergency Proclamations, Mandatory HRS §127A‑27 Process, and Environmental‑Right Standing

Nakoa III: Dual‑Check Standard for Emergency Proclamations, Mandatory HRS §127A‑27 Process, and Environmental‑Right Standing

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Nakoa III: Dual‑Check Standard for Emergency Proclamations, Mandatory HRS §127A‑27 Process, and Environmental‑Right Standing Introduction In Nakoa III v. Governor of the State of Hawai‘i, the Hawai‘i...
Advancing-the-Trust Test for Attorneys’ Fees: Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Requires Merits Determination and “Assistance to the Court” Showing Before Shifting Fees in Contested Trust Matters

Advancing-the-Trust Test for Attorneys’ Fees: Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Requires Merits Determination and “Assistance to the Court” Showing Before Shifting Fees in Contested Trust Matters

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Advancing-the-Trust Test for Attorneys’ Fees: Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Requires Merits Determination and “Assistance to the Court” Showing Before Shifting Fees in Contested Trust Matters Case: In re:...
Hawai‘i Supreme Court Clarifies Condo Resale Disclosures: Managing Agents Must Provide Online Downloads at No Cost and Must Produce Resale-Specific Documents

Hawai‘i Supreme Court Clarifies Condo Resale Disclosures: Managing Agents Must Provide Online Downloads at No Cost and Must Produce Resale-Specific Documents

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Hawai‘i Supreme Court Clarifies Condo Resale Disclosures: Managing Agents Must Provide Online Downloads at No Cost and Must Produce Resale-Specific Documents Introduction In Caven, Jr. v. Certified...
CZMA’s Statewide Reach Defines Environmental Due Process: Agencies Must Hold Contested Case Hearings Before Renewing Revocable Permits; Environmental Courts May Modify Permits on HRS § 91‑14 Review

CZMA’s Statewide Reach Defines Environmental Due Process: Agencies Must Hold Contested Case Hearings Before Renewing Revocable Permits; Environmental Courts May Modify Permits on HRS § 91‑14 Review

Date: Sep 8, 2025
CZMA’s Statewide Reach Defines Environmental Due Process: Agencies Must Hold Contested Case Hearings Before Renewing Revocable Permits; Environmental Courts May Modify Permits on HRS § 91‑14 Review...
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Reaffirms Non-Appealability of Orders Vacating Arbitration Awards with Rehearing; Clarifies Final-Judgment Protocols in Special Proceedings

Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Reaffirms Non-Appealability of Orders Vacating Arbitration Awards with Rehearing; Clarifies Final-Judgment Protocols in Special Proceedings

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Reaffirming the Non-Appealability of Orders Vacating Arbitration Awards with Rehearing under HRS § 658A-28 and Mandating “In Aid of Jurisdiction” Remands for Final Judgments in Special Proceedings...
Cotenants’ Standing To Defend Absent Cotenants Against Adverse Possession, and Laches as a Bar to Century‑Old Land Court Claims: The Hawaiʻi Supreme Court’s Decision in In re Application of Pioneer Mill Co., Limited (2025)

Cotenants’ Standing To Defend Absent Cotenants Against Adverse Possession, and Laches as a Bar to Century‑Old Land Court Claims: The Hawaiʻi Supreme Court’s Decision in In re Application of Pioneer Mill Co., Limited (2025)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
“Equity Aids the Vigilant”: Cotenants May Defend Absent Cotenants Against Adverse Possession, and Laches Bars a Century-Old Land Court Claim Introduction In a published opinion with far-reaching...
Preponderance Standard Governs LUC Boundary Interpretations; Declaratory Orders Limited to Resolving Map Uncertainty

Preponderance Standard Governs LUC Boundary Interpretations; Declaratory Orders Limited to Resolving Map Uncertainty

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Preponderance Standard Governs LUC Boundary Interpretations; Declaratory Orders Limited to Resolving Map Uncertainty Introduction In Honoipu Hideaway, LLC v. State (Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi, August...
“Private Place” Need Not Be Defined in the Indictment; Courts May Consider Extrinsic Information to Assess Notice on Timely Challenges — State v. Kaakimaka (Haw. 2025)

“Private Place” Need Not Be Defined in the Indictment; Courts May Consider Extrinsic Information to Assess Notice on Timely Challenges — State v. Kaakimaka (Haw. 2025)

Date: Sep 2, 2025
“Private Place” Need Not Be Defined in the Indictment; Courts May Consider Extrinsic Information to Assess Notice on Timely Challenges — State v. Kaakimaka (Haw. 2025) Introduction In State v....
When the Record Is Not Enough: Hawai‘i Supreme Court Requires an EA as a Matter of Law for HEPA Exemptions Not Supported on the Face of the Agency Record

When the Record Is Not Enough: Hawai‘i Supreme Court Requires an EA as a Matter of Law for HEPA Exemptions Not Supported on the Face of the Agency Record

Date: Aug 31, 2025
When the Record Is Not Enough: Hawai‘i Supreme Court Requires an EA as a Matter of Law for HEPA Exemptions Not Supported on the Face of the Agency Record Introduction In Ke Kauhulu O Mānā v. Board of...
Rodriguez v. Mauna Kea Resort LLC: The “Specific-Percentage” Disclosure Rule for Hawaiʻi Service Charges

Rodriguez v. Mauna Kea Resort LLC: The “Specific-Percentage” Disclosure Rule for Hawaiʻi Service Charges

Date: Aug 26, 2025
Rodriguez v. Mauna Kea Resort LLC: The New Requirement to State the Exact Portion of a Service Charge Paid as Tip Income Introduction Rodriguez v. Mauna Kea Resort LLC, 155 Haw. 223 (Haw. 2025),...
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies Mandatory Director Indemnification and “Fees-on-Fees” Recovery: Loyalty Development Company, Ltd. v. Ching (2025)

Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies Mandatory Director Indemnification and “Fees-on-Fees” Recovery: Loyalty Development Company, Ltd. v. Ching (2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies Mandatory Director Indemnification and “Fees-on-Fees” Recovery Loyalty Development Company, Ltd. v. Ching, 154 Haw. 256 (2025) Introduction In Loyalty Development...
Cowan v. Exclusive Resorts: Contractual Attorney-Fee Clauses Override HRS § 607-14 in Assumpsit Actions

Cowan v. Exclusive Resorts: Contractual Attorney-Fee Clauses Override HRS § 607-14 in Assumpsit Actions

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Cowan v. Exclusive Resorts PBL1, LLC Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi, Opinion filed 14 August 2025 “Contract-Specific Fee Clauses Defeat Statutory Fees in Assumpsit” 1. Introduction Cowan v. Exclusive...
State v. Lavoie: Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi Restricts Expert-Fee Entitlements at Regular Sentencing and Adopts the “Aggregate” Test for HRS § 706-609 Resentencing Challenges

State v. Lavoie: Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi Restricts Expert-Fee Entitlements at Regular Sentencing and Adopts the “Aggregate” Test for HRS § 706-609 Resentencing Challenges

Date: Aug 15, 2025
State v. Lavoie: Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi Restricts Expert-Fee Entitlements at Regular Sentencing and Adopts the “Aggregate” Test for HRS § 706-609 Resentencing Challenges 1. Introduction In State v....
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies a 20-Year Statute of Limitations for Mortgage Foreclosure Actions

Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies a 20-Year Statute of Limitations for Mortgage Foreclosure Actions

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies a 20-Year Statute of Limitations for Mortgage Foreclosures Introduction In The Bank of New York Mellon v. White, SCWC-21-0000400 (Aug. 7 2025), the Hawaiʻi Supreme...
Beyond “Seal or Remove”: The Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Defines the Constitutional Limits of Record-Sealing under HRS § 831-3.2(f)

Beyond “Seal or Remove”: The Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Defines the Constitutional Limits of Record-Sealing under HRS § 831-3.2(f)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Beyond “Seal or Remove”: The Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Defines the Constitutional Limits of Record-Sealing under HRS § 831-3.2(f) Introduction On 4 August 2025 the Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi issued a...
“Implied Dissolution of Litigation Stays upon Reinstatement Orders” — A Commentary on Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A., Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi (2025)

“Implied Dissolution of Litigation Stays upon Reinstatement Orders” — A Commentary on Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A., Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi (2025)

Date: Aug 1, 2025
“Implied Dissolution of Litigation Stays upon Reinstatement Orders” Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A. — Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi, 29 July 2025 Introduction Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A. concerns prolonged...
Expanding Due-Process Standing: Skilled Nursing Facilities Gain Direct Appeal Rights in Hawaiʻi Medicaid Eligibility Disputes

Expanding Due-Process Standing: Skilled Nursing Facilities Gain Direct Appeal Rights in Hawaiʻi Medicaid Eligibility Disputes

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Expanding Due-Process Standing: Skilled Nursing Facilities Gain Direct Appeal Rights in Hawaiʻi Medicaid Eligibility Disputes Introduction Case: In re FT, by and through Aloha Nursing Rehab Centre v....
Refining the Boundaries of Prosecutorial Misconduct: The “Reasonable-Inference” Rule & Contextual Review after State v. Willis (2025)

Refining the Boundaries of Prosecutorial Misconduct: The “Reasonable-Inference” Rule & Contextual Review after State v. Willis (2025)

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Refining the Boundaries of Prosecutorial Misconduct: The “Reasonable-Inference” Rule & Contextual Review after State v. Willis (Haw. 2025) 1. Introduction Case: State of Hawaiʻi v. Erik Willis,...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert