Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Maine Case Commentaries

S.J.C. of Maine Vacates Foreclosure Judgment Due to Lack of Mortgage Ownership

S.J.C. of Maine Vacates Foreclosure Judgment Due to Lack of Mortgage Ownership

Date: Jul 4, 2014
S.J.C. of Maine Vacates Foreclosure Judgment Due to Lack of Mortgage Ownership Introduction In the case of Bank of America, N.A. v. Scott A. Greenleaf et al. (96 A.3d 700), the Supreme Judicial Court...
Agency and Negligence in Property Foreclosure: Analysis of Lougee Conservancy v. CitiMortgage, Inc.

Agency and Negligence in Property Foreclosure: Analysis of Lougee Conservancy v. CitiMortgage, Inc.

Date: Aug 3, 2012
Agency and Negligence in Property Foreclosure: Analysis of Lougee Conservancy v. CitiMortgage, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Lougee Conservancy et al. v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al. (48...
Unauthorized Disclosure of Health Information: Bonney v. Stephens Memorial Hospital Establishes Limits to Statutory Immunity

Unauthorized Disclosure of Health Information: Bonney v. Stephens Memorial Hospital Establishes Limits to Statutory Immunity

Date: Apr 13, 2011
Unauthorized Disclosure of Health Information: Bonney v. Stephens Memorial Hospital Establishes Limits to Statutory Immunity Introduction The case of Dwayne Bonney et al. v. Stephens Memorial...
MERS Lacks Standing to Foreclose in Maine: Implications for Mortgage Registration Systems

MERS Lacks Standing to Foreclose in Maine: Implications for Mortgage Registration Systems

Date: Aug 13, 2010
MERS Lacks Standing to Foreclose in Maine: Implications for Mortgage Registration Systems Introduction The case of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Jon E. Saunders et al. (2 A.3d...
Protecting Underinsured Motorist Rights After Auto Accident Settlements: Comprehensive Commentary on Beal v. Allstate (Me. 2010)

Protecting Underinsured Motorist Rights After Auto Accident Settlements: Comprehensive Commentary on Beal v. Allstate (Me. 2010)

Date: Mar 12, 2010
Protecting Underinsured Motorist Rights After Auto Accident Settlements: Comprehensive Commentary on Beal v. Allstate (Me. 2010) Introduction The case of Patricia Ruth Beal v. Allstate Insurance...
Employer Liability and Corrective Action in Co-Worker Sexual Harassment: Analysis of Linda Watt v. UniFirst Corporation

Employer Liability and Corrective Action in Co-Worker Sexual Harassment: Analysis of Linda Watt v. UniFirst Corporation

Date: May 6, 2009
Employer Liability and Corrective Action in Co-Worker Sexual Harassment: Analysis of Linda Watt v. UniFirst Corporation Introduction The case of Linda Watt v. UniFirst Corporation (969 A.2d 897)...
Clarifying Eminent Domain Boundaries: Insights from Paul Dyer et al. v. Department of Transportation

Clarifying Eminent Domain Boundaries: Insights from Paul Dyer et al. v. Department of Transportation

Date: Jun 27, 2008
Clarifying Eminent Domain Boundaries: Insights from Paul Dyer et al. v. Department of Transportation Introduction The case of Paul Dyer et al. v. Department of Transportation (951 A.2d 821)...
Affirmation of Maine Health Security Act's Limitation Period in Saunders v. Tisher

Affirmation of Maine Health Security Act's Limitation Period in Saunders v. Tisher

Date: Aug 3, 2006
Affirmation of Maine Health Security Act's Limitation Period in Saunders v. Tisher Introduction Saunders v. Tisher, 902 A.2d 830 (Me. 2006), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Judicial...
Supreme Judicial Court Upholds Broad Enforcement of Waivers of Subrogation in Construction Contracts

Supreme Judicial Court Upholds Broad Enforcement of Waivers of Subrogation in Construction Contracts

Date: Feb 24, 2005
Supreme Judicial Court Upholds Broad Enforcement of Waivers of Subrogation in Construction Contracts Introduction The case of Reliance National Indemnity et al. v. Knowles Industrial Services, Corp....
Affirmation of Contractual Clarity in Lottery Game Interpretations: LARRY MOODY v. STATE LIQUOR LOTTERY COMMISSION

Affirmation of Contractual Clarity in Lottery Game Interpretations: LARRY MOODY v. STATE LIQUOR LOTTERY COMMISSION

Date: Feb 26, 2004
Affirmation of Contractual Clarity in Lottery Game Interpretations: LARRY MOODY v. STATE LIQUOR LOTTERY COMMISSION Introduction The case of LARRY MOODY v. STATE LIQUOR LOTTERY COMMISSION (843 A.2d...
Real Estate Mortgage Foreclosure Not Barred by Expired Note: Johnson v. McNeil

Real Estate Mortgage Foreclosure Not Barred by Expired Note: Johnson v. McNeil

Date: Jun 22, 2002
Real Estate Mortgage Foreclosure Not Barred by Expired Note: Johnson v. McNeil Introduction Deborah J. Ames Johnson v. William McNeil Jr. et al., 800 A.2d 702, decided by the Supreme Judicial Court...
Curtis v. Gagne Porter: Extending Liability for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress through Participation in Criminal Planning

Curtis v. Gagne Porter: Extending Liability for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress through Participation in Criminal Planning

Date: Nov 16, 2001
Curtis v. Gagne Porter: Extending Liability for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress through Participation in Criminal Planning Introduction Barbara Curtis, an employee of Domino's Pizza,...
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine Upholds Grandparents Visitation Act in Rose Rideout v. Heaven Riendeau

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine Upholds Grandparents Visitation Act in Rose Rideout v. Heaven Riendeau

Date: Nov 14, 2000
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine Upholds Grandparents Visitation Act in Rose Rideout v. Heaven Riendeau Introduction Rose Rideout et al. v. Heaven Riendeau et al. (761 A.2d 291) is a landmark case...
Exclusive Possession and Landlord Liability: Rodrigue v. Rodrigue Establishes Material Fact Disputes

Exclusive Possession and Landlord Liability: Rodrigue v. Rodrigue Establishes Material Fact Disputes

Date: May 9, 1997
Exclusive Possession and Landlord Liability: Rodrigue v. Rodrigue Establishes Material Fact Disputes Introduction In the pivotal case of Rodrigue v. Rodrigue, decided by the Supreme Judicial Court of...
Discovering When a Cause of Action Accrues: The Precedent Set by McAfee v. Cole

Discovering When a Cause of Action Accrues: The Precedent Set by McAfee v. Cole

Date: Feb 19, 1994
Discovering When a Cause of Action Accrues: The Precedent Set by McAfee v. Cole Introduction Mark A. McAfee v. Warren S. Cole and Cole Farms Restaurant, Inc., 637 A.2d 463 (Supreme Judicial Court of...
Conditional Privilege in Employment Tenure Reviews: A Comprehensive Analysis of Lester v. Powers

Conditional Privilege in Employment Tenure Reviews: A Comprehensive Analysis of Lester v. Powers

Date: Aug 3, 1991
Conditional Privilege in Employment Tenure Reviews: A Comprehensive Analysis of Lester v. Powers Introduction Lewis F. Lester v. M. Jane E. Powers, 596 A.2d 65 (Me. 1991), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Hattie Tuttle v. Ralph Raymond, III: Establishing Malice and Enhanced Proof Standards for Punitive Damages in Maine

Hattie Tuttle v. Ralph Raymond, III: Establishing Malice and Enhanced Proof Standards for Punitive Damages in Maine

Date: Jun 22, 1985
Hattie Tuttle v. Ralph Raymond, III: Establishing Malice and Enhanced Proof Standards for Punitive Damages in Maine Introduction The case of Hattie Tuttle v. Ralph Raymond, III represents a pivotal...
Refining Hearsay Exceptions in Sexual Assault Cases: An Analysis of State v. True III

Refining Hearsay Exceptions in Sexual Assault Cases: An Analysis of State v. True III

Date: Dec 18, 1981
Refining Hearsay Exceptions in Sexual Assault Cases: An Analysis of State of Maine v. Robert C. True III (438 A.2d 460) Introduction State of Maine v. Robert C. True III is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Appellate Deference to Trial Court Custody Decisions: A Comprehensive Analysis of Moira Emerson Harmon v. Erlon L. Emerson

Appellate Deference to Trial Court Custody Decisions: A Comprehensive Analysis of Moira Emerson Harmon v. Erlon L. Emerson

Date: Feb 14, 1981
Appellate Deference to Trial Court Custody Decisions: A Comprehensive Analysis of Moira Emerson Harmon v. Erlon L. Emerson Introduction The case of Moira Emerson Harmon v. Erlon L. Emerson, decided...
Establishing Strict Judicial Standards for Confession Admissibility: State of Maine v. Da (1972)

Establishing Strict Judicial Standards for Confession Admissibility: State of Maine v. Da (1972)

Date: Dec 9, 1972
Establishing Strict Judicial Standards for Confession Admissibility State of Maine v. David Conrad Collins, 297 A.2d 620 (1972) Introduction State of Maine v. David Conrad Collins is a landmark...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert