Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Montana Case Commentaries

Enforcing Civility and Fitness: The ODC’s Amended Disciplinary Complaint Against Mark E. Anderson Under MRPC 3.1, 3.5, and 8.4

Enforcing Civility and Fitness: The ODC’s Amended Disciplinary Complaint Against Mark E. Anderson Under MRPC 3.1, 3.5, and 8.4

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Enforcing Civility and Fitness: The ODC’s Amended Disciplinary Complaint Against Mark E. Anderson Under MRPC 3.1, 3.5, and 8.4 Important procedural note: Although the source is labeled as an...
Initial Arraignment Is the Sole Trigger for Automatic Judicial Substitution in Montana Criminal Cases

Initial Arraignment Is the Sole Trigger for Automatic Judicial Substitution in Montana Criminal Cases

Date: Oct 31, 2025
Initial Arraignment Is the Sole Trigger for Automatic Judicial Substitution in Montana Criminal Cases Introduction In Caye v. Twentieth Judicial District Court (2025 MT 246), the Supreme Court of...
Basque (Mont. 2025): Denial of Venue Change in Parenting-Plan Enforcement Under Ends-of-Justice and Continuing Jurisdiction (Noncitable)

Basque (Mont. 2025): Denial of Venue Change in Parenting-Plan Enforcement Under Ends-of-Justice and Continuing Jurisdiction (Noncitable)

Date: Oct 31, 2025
Basque (Mont. 2025): Denial of Venue Change in Parenting-Plan Enforcement Under Ends-of-Justice and Continuing Jurisdiction (Noncitable) Introduction In In re the Marriage of Basque, 2025 MT 247N,...
No Lesser-Included: Montana High Court Holds Destruction of a Communication Device Is Not a Lesser-Included Offense of Evidence Tampering (State v. Carlson, 2025 MT 245)

No Lesser-Included: Montana High Court Holds Destruction of a Communication Device Is Not a Lesser-Included Offense of Evidence Tampering (State v. Carlson, 2025 MT 245)

Date: Oct 31, 2025
No Lesser-Included: Destruction of a Communication Device Is Not a Lesser-Included Offense of Evidence Tampering Case: State v. Taylor Jean Carlson, 2025 MT 245 (Mont. Oct. 28, 2025) Court: Supreme...
No Final Opinion Yet: The Disciplinary Case Against Mark E. Anderson Signals Strict Enforcement of MRPC 3.1, 3.5, and 8.4 for Abusive Litigation Conduct

No Final Opinion Yet: The Disciplinary Case Against Mark E. Anderson Signals Strict Enforcement of MRPC 3.1, 3.5, and 8.4 for Abusive Litigation Conduct

Date: Oct 28, 2025
No Final Opinion Yet: The Disciplinary Case Against Mark E. Anderson Signals Strict Enforcement of MRPC 3.1, 3.5, and 8.4 for Abusive Litigation Conduct Introduction This commentary examines the...
When Parties Fail to Provide Valuation Evidence, a District Court May Order Appraisal or Sale and Still Equitably Divide the Estate: Nonprecedential Affirmance in Marriage of Schafer

When Parties Fail to Provide Valuation Evidence, a District Court May Order Appraisal or Sale and Still Equitably Divide the Estate: Nonprecedential Affirmance in Marriage of Schafer

Date: Oct 22, 2025
When Parties Fail to Provide Valuation Evidence, a District Court May Order Appraisal or Sale and Still Equitably Divide the Estate: Nonprecedential Affirmance in Marriage of Schafer Court: Supreme...
No Waiver Without a Record: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms and Clarifies § 53‑21‑119(1), MCA, Requirements for Waiver in Involuntary Commitment Proceedings

No Waiver Without a Record: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms and Clarifies § 53‑21‑119(1), MCA, Requirements for Waiver in Involuntary Commitment Proceedings

Date: Oct 22, 2025
No Waiver Without a Record: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms and Clarifies § 53‑21‑119(1), MCA, Requirements for Waiver in Involuntary Commitment Proceedings Introduction In Matter of P.G.J., 2025 MT...
No Implied Easements from Settlement Silence: Four‑Corners Enforcement of MOUs, Strict Limits on Easement “Maintenance,” and Fees for Multiplying Proceedings (Schubert v. Toepp, 2025 MT 239)

No Implied Easements from Settlement Silence: Four‑Corners Enforcement of MOUs, Strict Limits on Easement “Maintenance,” and Fees for Multiplying Proceedings (Schubert v. Toepp, 2025 MT 239)

Date: Oct 22, 2025
No Implied Easements from Settlement Silence: Four‑Corners Enforcement of MOUs, Strict Limits on Easement “Maintenance,” and Fees for Multiplying Proceedings (Schubert v. Toepp, 2025 MT 239)...
State v. Spangler (2025 MT 244N): Nonprecedential Reaffirmation that Single-Witness Testimony Can Sustain Unlawful Restraint; Remand to Correct Judgment to Attempted Assault with a Weapon

State v. Spangler (2025 MT 244N): Nonprecedential Reaffirmation that Single-Witness Testimony Can Sustain Unlawful Restraint; Remand to Correct Judgment to Attempted Assault with a Weapon

Date: Oct 22, 2025
State v. Spangler (2025 MT 244N): Nonprecedential Reaffirmation that Single-Witness Testimony Can Sustain Unlawful Restraint; Remand to Correct Judgment to Attempted Assault with a Weapon...
State v. Burrington: Medically Required Functional Restrictions Can Constitute “Protracted Impairment” for Serious Bodily Injury; Self-Defense May Be Asserted While Disputing the Injury Element

State v. Burrington: Medically Required Functional Restrictions Can Constitute “Protracted Impairment” for Serious Bodily Injury; Self-Defense May Be Asserted While Disputing the Injury Element

Date: Oct 22, 2025
State v. Burrington: Medically Required Functional Restrictions Can Constitute “Protracted Impairment” for Serious Bodily Injury; Self-Defense May Be Asserted While Disputing the Injury Element...
Privilege Follows the Reporting: Montana High Court Holds Place of Newsgathering Governs Media-Subpoena Privileges

Privilege Follows the Reporting: Montana High Court Holds Place of Newsgathering Governs Media-Subpoena Privileges

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Privilege Follows the Reporting: Montana High Court Holds Place of Newsgathering Governs Media-Subpoena Privileges Introduction In EQT CHAP LLC v. Environmental Health Sciences, 2025 MT 237, the...
No Stalking Required: Assault-Based Orders of Protection and Deference to Trial Courts Under Montana’s Abuse-of-Discretion Review

No Stalking Required: Assault-Based Orders of Protection and Deference to Trial Courts Under Montana’s Abuse-of-Discretion Review

Date: Oct 16, 2025
No Stalking Required: Assault-Based Orders of Protection and Deference to Trial Courts Under Montana’s Abuse-of-Discretion Review Note: This is a memorandum opinion designated noncitable under...
Employment-Based Trustee Conflicts Presumed and Beneficiary Access to Partner Financials: The Montana Supreme Court’s Framework in Matter of the Potter Exemption Trust

Employment-Based Trustee Conflicts Presumed and Beneficiary Access to Partner Financials: The Montana Supreme Court’s Framework in Matter of the Potter Exemption Trust

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Employment-Based Trustee Conflicts Presumed and Beneficiary Access to Partner Financials: The Montana Supreme Court’s Framework in Matter of the Potter Exemption Trust Introduction In Matter of the...
State v. Ramirez: When “Mere Presence” and Accomplice-Caution Jury Instructions Are Properly Denied

State v. Ramirez: When “Mere Presence” and Accomplice-Caution Jury Instructions Are Properly Denied

Date: Oct 16, 2025
State v. Ramirez: When “Mere Presence” and Accomplice-Caution Jury Instructions Are Properly Denied Introduction In State v. E. Ramirez, 2025 MT 232, the Supreme Court of Montana affirmed the...
Single-Count Charging of Felony Theft by Common Scheme Permissible; Rowe Distinguished and Limited to Non-Cognizable “Common Scheme” Charges

Single-Count Charging of Felony Theft by Common Scheme Permissible; Rowe Distinguished and Limited to Non-Cognizable “Common Scheme” Charges

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Single-Count Charging of Felony Theft by Common Scheme Permissible; Rowe Distinguished and Limited to Non-Cognizable “Common Scheme” Charges Introduction In State v. Wolfchild, 2025 MT 234N, the...
Nonprecedential Reaffirmation: Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity and Monell’s Policy-or-Custom Requirement Bar Malicious Prosecution and False Arrest Claims

Nonprecedential Reaffirmation: Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity and Monell’s Policy-or-Custom Requirement Bar Malicious Prosecution and False Arrest Claims

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Nonprecedential Reaffirmation: Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity and Monell’s Policy-or-Custom Requirement Bar Malicious Prosecution and False Arrest Claims Introduction In Stone v. City of Livingston,...
Nonprecedential Clarifications on Civil Protective Orders: Counterman’s Criminal Mens Rea Is Inapplicable; Electronic, Sexualized Emails Can Constitute a “Course of Conduct” for Montana Stalking OOPs

Nonprecedential Clarifications on Civil Protective Orders: Counterman’s Criminal Mens Rea Is Inapplicable; Electronic, Sexualized Emails Can Constitute a “Course of Conduct” for Montana Stalking OOPs

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Nonprecedential Clarifications on Civil Protective Orders: Counterman’s Criminal Mens Rea Is Inapplicable; Electronic, Sexualized Emails Can Constitute a “Course of Conduct” for Montana Stalking OOPs...
Partition in Kind Prevails: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Authority to Modify Referees’ Plans and Impose Reciprocal Easements under the UPHPA

Partition in Kind Prevails: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Authority to Modify Referees’ Plans and Impose Reciprocal Easements under the UPHPA

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Partition in Kind Prevails: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Authority to Modify Referees’ Plans and Impose Reciprocal Easements under the UPHPA Introduction In Barce v. Filler (Supreme Court of...
“Public Repute” Means Community, Not Bureaucracy: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Common‑Law Marriage Even Where Partners Marked “Single” on Official Forms

“Public Repute” Means Community, Not Bureaucracy: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Common‑Law Marriage Even Where Partners Marked “Single” on Official Forms

Date: Oct 10, 2025
“Public Repute” Means Community, Not Bureaucracy: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Common‑Law Marriage Even Where Partners Marked “Single” on Official Forms Introduction In Estate of Hudson, 2025 MT...
No Herculean Efforts Required: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Fact-Dependent “Reasonable Efforts” in Interstate Child Welfare Cases

No Herculean Efforts Required: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Fact-Dependent “Reasonable Efforts” in Interstate Child Welfare Cases

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Herculean Efforts Required: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Fact-Dependent “Reasonable Efforts” in Interstate Child Welfare Cases Introduction In Matter of B.B.-R., YINC (Supreme Court of Montana,...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert