Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Nevada Case Commentaries

Nevada Rejects Portal-to-Portal Act Exceptions: PPA’s Preliminary/Postliminary Carveouts Are Not Incorporated into Nevada Wage-Hour Law

Nevada Rejects Portal-to-Portal Act Exceptions: PPA’s Preliminary/Postliminary Carveouts Are Not Incorporated into Nevada Wage-Hour Law

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Nevada Rejects Portal-to-Portal Act Exceptions: PPA’s Preliminary/Postliminary Carveouts Are Not Incorporated into Nevada Wage-Hour Law Introduction In an en banc opinion answering a certified...
Confidentiality Breaches Do Not Justify Dismissal in Bar Discipline; Fifth Amendment Adverse Inferences Allowed — In re Discipline of Sandy Van

Confidentiality Breaches Do Not Justify Dismissal in Bar Discipline; Fifth Amendment Adverse Inferences Allowed — In re Discipline of Sandy Van

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Confidentiality Breaches Do Not Justify Dismissal in Bar Discipline; Fifth Amendment Adverse Inferences Allowed — In re Discipline of Sandy Van Introduction In this automatic review of a disciplinary...
Recantations Alone Are Insufficient: Nevada Clarifies Clear-and-Convincing, Total-Evidence Review and Deferential Credibility Findings in Factual Innocence Petitions

Recantations Alone Are Insufficient: Nevada Clarifies Clear-and-Convincing, Total-Evidence Review and Deferential Credibility Findings in Factual Innocence Petitions

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Recantations Alone Are Insufficient: Nevada Clarifies Clear-and-Convincing, Total-Evidence Review and Deferential Credibility Findings in Factual Innocence Petitions Introduction In this order of...
Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies Enforceability of Sole-Discretion Gaming Suitability Termination Clauses and Treats Undisclosed Vendor Kickbacks as Bad Faith and Fraud

Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies Enforceability of Sole-Discretion Gaming Suitability Termination Clauses and Treats Undisclosed Vendor Kickbacks as Bad Faith and Fraud

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies Enforceability of Sole-Discretion Gaming Suitability Termination Clauses and Treats Undisclosed Vendor Kickbacks as Bad Faith and Fraud Introduction In Seibel v. PHWLV,...
Inherent Judicial Authority Controls Court Security: Nevada Supreme Court Holds EJDC Deputy Marshals Are Judicial Employees Despite Peace Officer Powers, and NRS 289 Does Not Apply

Inherent Judicial Authority Controls Court Security: Nevada Supreme Court Holds EJDC Deputy Marshals Are Judicial Employees Despite Peace Officer Powers, and NRS 289 Does Not Apply

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Inherent Judicial Authority Controls Court Security: Nevada Supreme Court Holds EJDC Deputy Marshals Are Judicial Employees Despite Peace Officer Powers, and NRS 289 Does Not Apply Introduction In...
Area Identification Signs Are Distinct from Billboards; Deference to Municipal Land-Use Interpretations and Beneficial-Interest Standing Clarified

Area Identification Signs Are Distinct from Billboards; Deference to Municipal Land-Use Interpretations and Beneficial-Interest Standing Clarified

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Area Identification Signs Are Distinct from Billboards; Deference to Municipal Land-Use Interpretations and Beneficial-Interest Standing Clarified Introduction In Reno Real Estate Development, LLC v....
Young v. State: Nevada Adopts a Unified Juror-Bias Standard Under NRS 16.050 and NRCrP 17(6), Partially Overruling Sayedzada; Clarifies “Larceny from the Person” Instruction

Young v. State: Nevada Adopts a Unified Juror-Bias Standard Under NRS 16.050 and NRCrP 17(6), Partially Overruling Sayedzada; Clarifies “Larceny from the Person” Instruction

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Young v. State: Nevada Adopts a Unified Juror-Bias Standard Under NRS 16.050 and NRCrP 17(6), Partially Overruling Sayedzada; Clarifies “Larceny from the Person” Instruction Introduction In Young...
Disfavoring Token-Efforts-Only Terminations in Private Petitions and Rejecting Admissions by Silence: Nevada Supreme Court’s Guidance in In re Parental Rights as to S.A.T.

Disfavoring Token-Efforts-Only Terminations in Private Petitions and Rejecting Admissions by Silence: Nevada Supreme Court’s Guidance in In re Parental Rights as to S.A.T.

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Disfavoring Token-Efforts-Only Terminations in Private Petitions and Rejecting Admissions by Silence: Nevada Supreme Court’s Guidance in In re Parental Rights as to S.A.T. Introduction In In the...
Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies: Post‑Judgment Sealing Orders Are Not Appealable Unless They Affect Rights Embedded in the Final Judgment (Bloom v. Rodgers, 2025)

Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies: Post‑Judgment Sealing Orders Are Not Appealable Unless They Affect Rights Embedded in the Final Judgment (Bloom v. Rodgers, 2025)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies: Post‑Judgment Sealing Orders Are Not Appealable Unless They Affect Rights Embedded in the Final Judgment Case Overview and Procedural Posture Case: Bloom v. Rodgers...
Limited Pearce Presumption in Nevada Parole Proceedings: No Vindictiveness Presumed When the Parole Board Self‑Corrects

Limited Pearce Presumption in Nevada Parole Proceedings: No Vindictiveness Presumed When the Parole Board Self‑Corrects

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Limited Pearce Presumption in Nevada Parole Proceedings: No Vindictiveness Presumed When the Parole Board Self‑Corrects Introduction This commentary analyzes the Nevada Supreme Court’s decision in...
“Substantial Opportunity to Use” Test for Late-Disclosed Evidence: Nevada Clarifies Prejudice and Continuance Cures in Lee v. State

“Substantial Opportunity to Use” Test for Late-Disclosed Evidence: Nevada Clarifies Prejudice and Continuance Cures in Lee v. State

Date: Sep 13, 2025
“Substantial Opportunity to Use” Test for Late-Disclosed Evidence: Nevada Clarifies Prejudice and Continuance Cures in Lee v. State Introduction In Lee (Michael) v. State, No. 85004 (Nev. Sept. 12,...
Misheard Confession, Independent Probable Cause, and Ligature Strangulation as a Deadly Weapon: Roginsky v. State (Nev. 2025)

Misheard Confession, Independent Probable Cause, and Ligature Strangulation as a Deadly Weapon: Roginsky v. State (Nev. 2025)

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Misheard Confession, Independent Probable Cause, and Ligature Strangulation as a Deadly Weapon: Roginsky v. State (Nev. 2025) Introduction In Roginsky (Robert) v. State, No. 89006 (Nev. Sept. 12,...
No Two‑Step Reconsideration Motions under WDCR 12(8)/DCR 13(7) and Sanctionable “Mediation‑as‑Pretext” Deception under RPC 4.1

No Two‑Step Reconsideration Motions under WDCR 12(8)/DCR 13(7) and Sanctionable “Mediation‑as‑Pretext” Deception under RPC 4.1

Date: Sep 12, 2025
No Two‑Step Reconsideration Motions under WDCR 12(8)/DCR 13(7) and Sanctionable “Mediation‑as‑Pretext” Deception under RPC 4.1 Case Controlled Contamination Services, LLC v. Dist. Ct. (Fredericks),...
Differential Diagnosis Endorsed for Abusive Head Trauma: Nevada Affirms Physician Causation Testimony Without Biomechanical Expertise and Clarifies Limits on Juror-Impeachment and Prosecutorial Comment

Differential Diagnosis Endorsed for Abusive Head Trauma: Nevada Affirms Physician Causation Testimony Without Biomechanical Expertise and Clarifies Limits on Juror-Impeachment and Prosecutorial Comment

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Differential Diagnosis Endorsed for Abusive Head Trauma: Nevada Affirms Physician Causation Testimony Without Biomechanical Expertise and Clarifies Limits on Juror-Impeachment and Prosecutorial...
Procedural Due Process and Permanency Timelines: Nevada Affirms the Constitutionality of NRS 128.109’s Rebuttable Presumptions in Termination of Parental Rights

Procedural Due Process and Permanency Timelines: Nevada Affirms the Constitutionality of NRS 128.109’s Rebuttable Presumptions in Termination of Parental Rights

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Procedural Due Process and Permanency Timelines: Nevada Affirms the Constitutionality of NRS 128.109’s Rebuttable Presumptions in Termination of Parental Rights Introduction In In re: Parental Rights...
Nevada Supreme Court Enforces Contractual Irreparable-Harm Presumptions to Support Mandatory Injunction and Specific Performance in Convertible Note Disputes

Nevada Supreme Court Enforces Contractual Irreparable-Harm Presumptions to Support Mandatory Injunction and Specific Performance in Convertible Note Disputes

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Nevada Supreme Court Enforces Contractual Irreparable-Harm Presumptions to Support Mandatory Injunction and Specific Performance in Convertible Note Disputes Introduction In Blackstar Enterprise...
Post‑Offer Interest Applies to Punitive Damages; “Genuine Dispute” Folded into Nevada Bad‑Faith Standard and May Defeat Refusal‑to‑Defend Claims; Unfair Insurance Practices Liability Limited to Insurers — Commentary on Olson v. Mid‑Century Ins. Co. (Nev. 2025)

Post‑Offer Interest Applies to Punitive Damages; “Genuine Dispute” Folded into Nevada Bad‑Faith Standard and May Defeat Refusal‑to‑Defend Claims; Unfair Insurance Practices Liability Limited to Insurers — Commentary on Olson v. Mid‑Century Ins. Co. (Nev. 2025)

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Post‑Offer Interest Applies to Punitive Damages; “Genuine Dispute” Folded into Nevada Bad‑Faith Standard and May Defeat Refusal‑to‑Defend Claims; Unfair Insurance Practices Liability Limited to...
Harvey v. City of Reno: Abutter Access Is Limited to Easement by Necessity; No Prescriptive Rights Against the State; and Courts May Judicially Notice Recorded Highway Records on a Motion to Dismiss

Harvey v. City of Reno: Abutter Access Is Limited to Easement by Necessity; No Prescriptive Rights Against the State; and Courts May Judicially Notice Recorded Highway Records on a Motion to Dismiss

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Harvey v. City of Reno: Abutter Access Is Limited to Easement by Necessity; No Prescriptive Rights Against the State; and Courts May Judicially Notice Recorded Highway Records on a Motion to Dismiss...
Nevada Supreme Court bars “comparable verdicts” in excessive-damages review and reaffirms full contingency-fee recovery under NRCP 68: Bellomo v. Roybal

Nevada Supreme Court bars “comparable verdicts” in excessive-damages review and reaffirms full contingency-fee recovery under NRCP 68: Bellomo v. Roybal

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Nevada Supreme Court bars “comparable verdicts” in excessive-damages review and reaffirms full contingency-fee recovery under NRCP 68: Bellomo v. Roybal Introduction In Bellomo v. Roybal, the Supreme...
Due-Weight Rule in Post-Termination Placements: Nevada Supreme Court Reaffirms Courts Must Consider, Not Defer to, DFS Placement Preferences

Due-Weight Rule in Post-Termination Placements: Nevada Supreme Court Reaffirms Courts Must Consider, Not Defer to, DFS Placement Preferences

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Due-Weight Rule in Post-Termination Placements: Nevada Supreme Court Reaffirms Courts Must Consider, Not Defer to, DFS Placement Preferences Case: Destin v. District Court (Handwerker-LaMaster)...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert