Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New York Case Commentaries

Causal Nexus and Finality of Consent Awards: Third Department Limits “Removal for Cause” Decertification under 9 NYCRR 6056.2(h)

Causal Nexus and Finality of Consent Awards: Third Department Limits “Removal for Cause” Decertification under 9 NYCRR 6056.2(h)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Causal Nexus and Finality of Consent Awards: Third Department Limits “Removal for Cause” Decertification under 9 NYCRR 6056.2(h) Introduction In Matter of Ferretti v. New York State Division of...
Implicit Severance Bars CPLR 5501(a)(1) Review of a Prior Final Judgment; Easement Holders Cannot Obstruct Rights-of-Way by Parking

Implicit Severance Bars CPLR 5501(a)(1) Review of a Prior Final Judgment; Easement Holders Cannot Obstruct Rights-of-Way by Parking

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Implicit Severance Bars CPLR 5501(a)(1) Review of a Prior Final Judgment; Easement Holders Cannot Obstruct Rights-of-Way by Parking Introduction This commentary examines the Appellate Division, Third...
Pleading Actual-Intent UVTA Claims in New York: Third Department Aligns § 273(a)(1) with CPLR 3016(b), Permits Information‑and‑Belief Allegations with Factual Basis, and Rejects Affidavits as “Documentary Evidence” on CPLR 3211 Motions

Pleading Actual-Intent UVTA Claims in New York: Third Department Aligns § 273(a)(1) with CPLR 3016(b), Permits Information‑and‑Belief Allegations with Factual Basis, and Rejects Affidavits as “Documentary Evidence” on CPLR 3211 Motions

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Pleading Actual-Intent UVTA Claims in New York: Third Department Aligns § 273(a)(1) with CPLR 3016(b), Permits Information‑and‑Belief Allegations with Factual Basis, and Rejects Affidavits as...
People v. Demas: Passing “Superseding Indictment” References, Limited Juror–Witness Familiarity, and Minor Inaccuracies Do Not, Without More, Impair Grand Jury Integrity Under CPL 210.35(5)

People v. Demas: Passing “Superseding Indictment” References, Limited Juror–Witness Familiarity, and Minor Inaccuracies Do Not, Without More, Impair Grand Jury Integrity Under CPL 210.35(5)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
People v. Demas: Passing “Superseding Indictment” References, Limited Juror–Witness Familiarity, and Minor Inaccuracies Do Not, Without More, Impair Grand Jury Integrity Under CPL 210.35(5) Decision:...
People v. George: Deliberate Vehicular Assault Supports Inferences of Intent for Aggravated Animal Cruelty and Criminal Mischief; Strategic Rejection of an EED Defense Constitutes Effective Assistance

People v. George: Deliberate Vehicular Assault Supports Inferences of Intent for Aggravated Animal Cruelty and Criminal Mischief; Strategic Rejection of an EED Defense Constitutes Effective Assistance

Date: Nov 1, 2025
People v. George: Deliberate Vehicular Assault Supports Inferences of Intent for Aggravated Animal Cruelty and Criminal Mischief; Strategic Rejection of an EED Defense Constitutes Effective...
No Automatic Conflict from Out‑of‑County Brief‑Writing Relationship Between Defense Counsel and Prosecutor; Defendant Must Show the Potential Conflict Operated on the Defense

No Automatic Conflict from Out‑of‑County Brief‑Writing Relationship Between Defense Counsel and Prosecutor; Defendant Must Show the Potential Conflict Operated on the Defense

Date: Nov 1, 2025
No Automatic Conflict from Out‑of‑County Brief‑Writing Relationship Between Defense Counsel and Prosecutor; Defendant Must Show the Potential Conflict Operated on the Defense Commentary on People v....
People v. Riddick: DNA-Focused “Trace Evidence” Warrants, Public-Street Phone Seizures, and Expanded Use of Molineux and Opening-the-Door When Identity Is the Only Issue

People v. Riddick: DNA-Focused “Trace Evidence” Warrants, Public-Street Phone Seizures, and Expanded Use of Molineux and Opening-the-Door When Identity Is the Only Issue

Date: Nov 1, 2025
People v. Riddick: DNA-Focused “Trace Evidence” Warrants, Public-Street Phone Seizures, and Expanded Use of Molineux and Opening-the-Door When Identity Is the Only Issue Court: Appellate Division of...
Environmental Noncompliance as Material Breach: Subcontractor Barred from Payment and Bond Recovery; Surety’s Takeover with Reservation of Rights Upheld; No Judicial Estoppel Without Prior Success

Environmental Noncompliance as Material Breach: Subcontractor Barred from Payment and Bond Recovery; Surety’s Takeover with Reservation of Rights Upheld; No Judicial Estoppel Without Prior Success

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Environmental Noncompliance as Material Breach: Subcontractor Barred from Payment and Bond Recovery; Surety’s Takeover with Reservation of Rights Upheld; No Judicial Estoppel Without Prior Success...
Court, Not Arbitrator, Decides Compliance with Pre‑Arbitration Conditions; One‑Year Claim Limit in Home‑Inspection Agreements Enforced at Pleading Stage

Court, Not Arbitrator, Decides Compliance with Pre‑Arbitration Conditions; One‑Year Claim Limit in Home‑Inspection Agreements Enforced at Pleading Stage

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Court, Not Arbitrator, Decides Compliance with Pre‑Arbitration Conditions; One‑Year Claim Limit in Home‑Inspection Agreements Enforced at Pleading Stage Introduction This commentary examines the...
Second Department Clarifies: Referee Reports Must Rest on Produced Business Records; RPAPL 1301(3) Defense Fails Absent Prejudice

Second Department Clarifies: Referee Reports Must Rest on Produced Business Records; RPAPL 1301(3) Defense Fails Absent Prejudice

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Second Department Clarifies: Referee Reports Must Rest on Produced Business Records; RPAPL 1301(3) Defense Fails Absent Prejudice Introduction In Citimortgage, Inc. v. Hassanin (2025 NY Slip Op...
Insurer’s Denial ≠ Breach of Procurement Duty; Ambiguous Releases Won’t Bar Third‑Party Indemnity: Grala v. Structural Preservation Systems, LLC (2d Dep’t 2025)

Insurer’s Denial ≠ Breach of Procurement Duty; Ambiguous Releases Won’t Bar Third‑Party Indemnity: Grala v. Structural Preservation Systems, LLC (2d Dep’t 2025)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Insurer’s Denial ≠ Breach of Procurement Duty; Ambiguous Releases Won’t Bar Third‑Party Indemnity: Grala v. Structural Preservation Systems, LLC (2d Dep’t 2025) Introduction This commentary analyzes...
Failure to Schedule Water-Meter Replacement Constitutes “Denial of Access” Under NYC Water Board Rate Schedule

Failure to Schedule Water-Meter Replacement Constitutes “Denial of Access” Under NYC Water Board Rate Schedule

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Failure to Schedule Water-Meter Replacement Constitutes “Denial of Access” Under NYC Water Board Rate Schedule Introduction In Matter of 29-76 Realty Co., LLC v. New York City Water Board, 2025 NY...
“Appearance of Impropriety” Is a Constitutionally Definite Recusal Standard in Local Ethics Codes: Commentary on Matter of Goldstein v. Village of Mamaroneck Board of Ethics

“Appearance of Impropriety” Is a Constitutionally Definite Recusal Standard in Local Ethics Codes: Commentary on Matter of Goldstein v. Village of Mamaroneck Board of Ethics

Date: Nov 1, 2025
“Appearance of Impropriety” Is a Constitutionally Definite Recusal Standard in Local Ethics Codes Commentary on Matter of Goldstein v. Village of Mamaroneck Board of Ethics, 2025 NY Slip Op 05950 (2d...
Adverse Possession Under Color of Title Defeats Unprobated Remainder Interests; After-Acquired Title Extends Mortgage to Entire Premises

Adverse Possession Under Color of Title Defeats Unprobated Remainder Interests; After-Acquired Title Extends Mortgage to Entire Premises

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Adverse Possession Under Color of Title Defeats Unprobated Remainder Interests; After-Acquired Title Extends Mortgage to Entire Premises Introduction In Walters v. O'Quinn, 2025 NY Slip Op 05988 (App...
Pattern of Non‑Cooperation with the Attorney Grievance Committee and Persistent Registration Delinquency Warrant Interim Suspension under 22 NYCRR 1240.9(a)(3)

Pattern of Non‑Cooperation with the Attorney Grievance Committee and Persistent Registration Delinquency Warrant Interim Suspension under 22 NYCRR 1240.9(a)(3)

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Pattern of Non‑Cooperation with the Attorney Grievance Committee and Persistent Registration Delinquency Warrant Interim Suspension under 22 NYCRR 1240.9(a)(3) Case: Matter of Biniakewitz, 2025 NY...
USPTO Qualifies as a “Foreign Jurisdiction” for Reciprocal Discipline; First Department Tailors Sanction to New York Precedent for Outsourced Trademark Practice

USPTO Qualifies as a “Foreign Jurisdiction” for Reciprocal Discipline; First Department Tailors Sanction to New York Precedent for Outsourced Trademark Practice

Date: Oct 30, 2025
USPTO Qualifies as a “Foreign Jurisdiction” for Reciprocal Discipline; First Department Tailors Sanction to New York Precedent for Outsourced Trademark Practice Introduction This commentary examines...
Hearing Required Where a Plea May Have Been Influenced by Counsel’s Predictions of Future Legal Change and a Conditional Third‑Party Payment: People v. Mower

Hearing Required Where a Plea May Have Been Influenced by Counsel’s Predictions of Future Legal Change and a Conditional Third‑Party Payment: People v. Mower

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Hearing Required Where a Plea May Have Been Influenced by Counsel’s Predictions of Future Legal Change and a Conditional Third‑Party Payment Commentary on People v. Mower, 2025 NY Slip Op 05851 (App...
No Enhanced Sentence for an Unstated Restitution Condition: Third Department Orders Specific Performance of Plea in People v. Nestler

No Enhanced Sentence for an Unstated Restitution Condition: Third Department Orders Specific Performance of Plea in People v. Nestler

Date: Oct 30, 2025
No Enhanced Sentence for an Unstated Restitution Condition: Third Department Orders Specific Performance of Plea in People v. Nestler Introduction In People v. Nestler, 2025 NY Slip Op 05852 (App Div...
Part Performance at the Preliminary-Injunction Stage: Third Department Affirms Denial of Mandatory Relief Where the Parties’ Conduct Evidences Assent to a Lease Relocation

Part Performance at the Preliminary-Injunction Stage: Third Department Affirms Denial of Mandatory Relief Where the Parties’ Conduct Evidences Assent to a Lease Relocation

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Part Performance at the Preliminary-Injunction Stage: Third Department Affirms Denial of Mandatory Relief Where the Parties’ Conduct Evidences Assent to a Lease Relocation Introduction In R. Kelly...
CPLR 5001 Does Not Expand a Surety’s Liability Beyond the Bond: No Prejudgment Interest Under Payment Bonds Limited to “Labor, Materials, and Equipment”

CPLR 5001 Does Not Expand a Surety’s Liability Beyond the Bond: No Prejudgment Interest Under Payment Bonds Limited to “Labor, Materials, and Equipment”

Date: Oct 30, 2025
CPLR 5001 Does Not Expand a Surety’s Liability Beyond the Bond: No Prejudgment Interest Under Payment Bonds Limited to “Labor, Materials, and Equipment” Introduction In Stone Cast, Inc. v. Couch,...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert