Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Oregon Case Commentaries

Grand Jury’s Prerogative Over Witness Presentation: Neither Prosecutors Nor Defendants Have a Unilateral Right to Dictate In‑Person vs. Remote Testimony Before Oregon Grand Juries

Grand Jury’s Prerogative Over Witness Presentation: Neither Prosecutors Nor Defendants Have a Unilateral Right to Dictate In‑Person vs. Remote Testimony Before Oregon Grand Juries

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Grand Jury’s Prerogative Over Witness Presentation: Neither Prosecutors Nor Defendants Have a Unilateral Right to Dictate In‑Person vs. Remote Testimony Before Oregon Grand Juries Introduction In...
Sewage Disposal Is an Essential Service for Tenant-Owned RV Spaces; Tenant Sanitation Duties Are Independent of Landlord Habitability Compliance

Sewage Disposal Is an Essential Service for Tenant-Owned RV Spaces; Tenant Sanitation Duties Are Independent of Landlord Habitability Compliance

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Sewage Disposal Is an Essential Service for Tenant-Owned RV Spaces; Tenant Sanitation Duties Are Independent of Landlord Habitability Compliance Introduction In Jared v. Harmon, 374 Or 381 (2025),...
No Contested Hearing Required to Accept Tribal Customary Adoption: Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies ORS 419B.656 and Affirms Tribal–State Shared Roles under ORICWA

No Contested Hearing Required to Accept Tribal Customary Adoption: Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies ORS 419B.656 and Affirms Tribal–State Shared Roles under ORICWA

Date: Sep 27, 2025
No Contested Hearing Required to Accept Tribal Customary Adoption: Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies ORS 419B.656 and Affirms Tribal–State Shared Roles under ORICWA Introduction In Dept. of Human...
ORS 12.125 Contains No Discovery Rule: One-Year Limit for ORLTA and Rental Agreement Claims Runs from Breach or Violation

ORS 12.125 Contains No Discovery Rule: One-Year Limit for ORLTA and Rental Agreement Claims Runs from Breach or Violation

Date: Sep 27, 2025
ORS 12.125 Contains No Discovery Rule: One-Year Limit for ORLTA and Rental Agreement Claims Runs from Breach or Violation Introduction In Hathaway v. B & J Property Investments, Inc., 374 Or 212...
In re Abel: Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies “Actual Knowledge” for RPC 8.4(a)(3) and Uses Objective Indicators to Prove It; False Criminal Threats in Demand Letters Merit Suspension

In re Abel: Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies “Actual Knowledge” for RPC 8.4(a)(3) and Uses Objective Indicators to Prove It; False Criminal Threats in Demand Letters Merit Suspension

Date: Sep 27, 2025
In re Abel: Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies “Actual Knowledge” for RPC 8.4(a)(3) and Uses Objective Indicators to Prove It; False Criminal Threats in Demand Letters Merit Suspension Citation: In re...
No Asportation Without Increased Isolation or Control: State v. Anderson Refines Oregon’s Kidnapping Standard and Confirms Property-Directed Violence Can Constitute Menacing

No Asportation Without Increased Isolation or Control: State v. Anderson Refines Oregon’s Kidnapping Standard and Confirms Property-Directed Violence Can Constitute Menacing

Date: Sep 27, 2025
No Asportation Without Increased Isolation or Control: State v. Anderson Refines Oregon’s Kidnapping Standard and Confirms Property-Directed Violence Can Constitute Menacing Introduction In State v....
Mandatory Relief Upon a Case‑Specific Showing of Prejudice from Joinder: The Oregon Supreme Court’s Clarification of ORS 132.560(3) in State v. Hernandez‑Esteban

Mandatory Relief Upon a Case‑Specific Showing of Prejudice from Joinder: The Oregon Supreme Court’s Clarification of ORS 132.560(3) in State v. Hernandez‑Esteban

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Mandatory Relief Upon a Case‑Specific Showing of Prejudice from Joinder: The Oregon Supreme Court’s Clarification of ORS 132.560(3) in State v. Hernandez‑Esteban Introduction In State v....
WRME Eligibility Turns on Insurer’s Current Reliance on an IME: Oregon Supreme Court Adopts a “Time-of-Decision” Test in Teitelman v. SAIF

WRME Eligibility Turns on Insurer’s Current Reliance on an IME: Oregon Supreme Court Adopts a “Time-of-Decision” Test in Teitelman v. SAIF

Date: Sep 27, 2025
WRME Eligibility Turns on Insurer’s Current Reliance on an IME: Oregon Supreme Court Adopts a “Time-of-Decision” Test in Teitelman v. SAIF Introduction In Teitelman v. SAIF, 374 Or 271 (2025), the...
Precision in Settlement: Oregon Supreme Court Narrows the Contribution-Bar Under ORS 465.480(4)(a)

Precision in Settlement: Oregon Supreme Court Narrows the Contribution-Bar Under ORS 465.480(4)(a)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Precision in Settlement: Oregon Supreme Court Narrows the Contribution-Bar Under ORS 465.480(4)(a) Introduction Continental Casualty Co. v. Argonaut Ins. Co., 374 Or 144 (2025) (“Continental v....
Beyond Water Quantity: Oregon Supreme Court Confirms Protection of Beneficial Use and Commands a Full Public-Interest Review in Water-Right Permitting (East Valley Water v. OWRD, 374 Or 148 (2025))

Beyond Water Quantity: Oregon Supreme Court Confirms Protection of Beneficial Use and Commands a Full Public-Interest Review in Water-Right Permitting (East Valley Water v. OWRD, 374 Or 148 (2025))

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Beyond Water Quantity: Oregon Supreme Court Confirms Protection of Beneficial Use and Commands a Full Public-Interest Review in Water-Right Permitting Commentary on East Valley Water District v....
State v. Logston (2025): Constitutional Supremacy in Consecutive Sentencing After Probation Revocation

State v. Logston (2025): Constitutional Supremacy in Consecutive Sentencing After Probation Revocation

Date: Aug 6, 2025
State v. Logston (374 Or 101, 2025): Constitutional Supremacy in Consecutive Sentencing After Probation Revocation Introduction State v. Logston presented the Oregon Supreme Court with a narrow, but...
Clarifying Rational-Basis Review in Oregon Tax Classifications:  Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Department of Revenue (374 Or 58)

Clarifying Rational-Basis Review in Oregon Tax Classifications: Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Department of Revenue (374 Or 58)

Date: Jul 29, 2025
Clarifying Rational-Basis Review in Oregon Tax Classifications: Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Department of Revenue (374 Or 58 - 2025) 1. Introduction Case Background. For decades, Oregon has taxed the...
Jackson v. KA-3 Associates, LLC: Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Landlord Duty to Maintain Common Areas Under ORS 90.320(1)

Jackson v. KA-3 Associates, LLC: Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Landlord Duty to Maintain Common Areas Under ORS 90.320(1)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Jackson v. KA-3 Associates, LLC: Extending Oregon Landlord Habitability Obligations to Common Areas Under ORS 90.320(1) Introduction Citation: Jackson v. KA-3 Associates, LLC, 374 Or 1 (2025),...
Implicit Nondisparagement Clauses Do Not Waive Oregon’s Anti-SLAPP Protections – A Commentary on Lowes v. Thompson, 374 Or 23 (2025)

Implicit Nondisparagement Clauses Do Not Waive Oregon’s Anti-SLAPP Protections – A Commentary on Lowes v. Thompson, 374 Or 23 (2025)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Implicit Nondisparagement Clauses Do Not Waive Oregon’s Anti-SLAPP Protections A Comprehensive Commentary on Lowes v. Thompson, 374 Or 23 (2025) 1. Introduction Lowes v. Thompson is the Oregon...
“The Registered-Owner Inference Rule” – A New Article I, § 9 Benchmark after State v. Betancourt (2025)

“The Registered-Owner Inference Rule” – A New Article I, § 9 Benchmark after State v. Betancourt (2025)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
“The Registered-Owner Inference Rule” – A New Article I, § 9 Benchmark after State v. Betancourt (2025) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Oregon’s en banc decision in State v. Betancourt, 374 Or...
Expanding Judicial Discretion in Presentence Incarceration Credits: State ex rel Torres-Lopez v. Fahrion (373 Or 816)

Expanding Judicial Discretion in Presentence Incarceration Credits: State ex rel Torres-Lopez v. Fahrion (373 Or 816)

Date: Jul 11, 2025
Expanding Judicial Discretion in Presentence Incarceration Credits: State ex rel Torres-Lopez v. Fahrion (373 Or 816) Introduction On 10 July 2025 the Oregon Supreme Court, sitting en banc, delivered...
“Dwelling” for Home-Occupation Permits Must Independently Qualify as an Allowed Category of Dwelling in the Zone – Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill County (373 Or 790)

“Dwelling” for Home-Occupation Permits Must Independently Qualify as an Allowed Category of Dwelling in the Zone – Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill County (373 Or 790)

Date: Jul 5, 2025
“Dwelling” for Home-Occupation Permits Must Independently Qualify as an Allowed Category of Dwelling in the Zone – Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill County, 373 Or 790 (2025) 1. Introduction In...
Crosbie v. Asante: Remand-Scope Orders Are Not Immediately Appealable under ORS 19.205(3)

Crosbie v. Asante: Remand-Scope Orders Are Not Immediately Appealable under ORS 19.205(3)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Crosbie v. Asante: Remand-Scope Orders Are Not Immediately Appealable under ORS 19.205(3) 1. Introduction In Crosbie v. Asante, 373 Or 773 (2025), the Oregon Supreme Court confronted a recurring...
The Burton Rule: Defense Counsel’s Latitude to Emphasize the Absence of Testimony in Closing Argument

The Burton Rule: Defense Counsel’s Latitude to Emphasize the Absence of Testimony in Closing Argument

Date: Jun 30, 2025
The Burton Rule: Defense Counsel’s Latitude to Emphasize the Absence of Testimony in Closing Argument Introduction In State v. Burton, 373 Or 750 (2025), the Oregon Supreme Court clarified the...
State v. Worsham: Plain-Error Limits on Unrequested Supplemental Jury Instructions

State v. Worsham: Plain-Error Limits on Unrequested Supplemental Jury Instructions

Date: Jun 30, 2025
State v. Worsham (373 Or 739, 2025): Plain-Error Limits on Unrequested Supplemental Jury Instructions Introduction State v. Worsham presented the Supreme Court of Oregon with a deceptively narrow...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert