Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Plain Meaning Over “Spirit”: Pennsylvania High Court Bars ARD Revocation for Pre‑Admission Conduct or Implied Conditions

Plain Meaning Over “Spirit”: Pennsylvania High Court Bars ARD Revocation for Pre‑Admission Conduct or Implied Conditions

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Plain Meaning Over “Spirit”: Pennsylvania High Court Bars ARD Revocation for Pre‑Admission Conduct or Implied Conditions Introduction In Commonwealth v. Jenkins, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania...
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Confirms Home Inspection Law’s One‑Year Period Is a Statute of Repose Triggered by Report Delivery (Gidor v. Mangus)

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Confirms Home Inspection Law’s One‑Year Period Is a Statute of Repose Triggered by Report Delivery (Gidor v. Mangus)

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Confirms Home Inspection Law’s One‑Year Period Is a Statute of Repose Triggered by Report Delivery Case: Gidor v. Mangus (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District,...
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Broadens MHPA Immunity to All Care During MHPA Admissions; Dissent Would Limit Immunity to Care That Facilitates Recovery from Mental Illness

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Broadens MHPA Immunity to All Care During MHPA Admissions; Dissent Would Limit Immunity to Care That Facilitates Recovery from Mental Illness

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Broadens MHPA Immunity to All Care During MHPA Admissions; Dissent Would Limit Immunity to Care That Facilitates Recovery from Mental Illness Introduction In Wunderly v....
No Precedent Set: Justice Wecht’s Dissent Urges Individualized Suspicion for Flight Plus Proximity to Marijuana Under Article I, Section 8

No Precedent Set: Justice Wecht’s Dissent Urges Individualized Suspicion for Flight Plus Proximity to Marijuana Under Article I, Section 8

Date: Oct 16, 2025
No Precedent Set: Justice Wecht’s Dissent Urges Individualized Suspicion for Flight Plus Proximity to Marijuana Under Article I, Section 8 Introduction In Commonwealth v. Coles, E., Aplt., the...
No Agency-Made Privileges: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds 37 Pa. Code § 61.2 Does Not Create an Evidentiary Privilege

No Agency-Made Privileges: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds 37 Pa. Code § 61.2 Does Not Create an Evidentiary Privilege

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Agency-Made Privileges: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds 37 Pa. Code § 61.2 Does Not Create an Evidentiary Privilege Introduction In Toland v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Pa....
Section 9760(1) Requires Credit to the New Sentence for Pre‑Sentence Custody on a Probation Detainer When the Detainer Is Based on the Same Conduct as the New Charge: Commonwealth v. Phillips (Pa. 2025)

Section 9760(1) Requires Credit to the New Sentence for Pre‑Sentence Custody on a Probation Detainer When the Detainer Is Based on the Same Conduct as the New Charge: Commonwealth v. Phillips (Pa. 2025)

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Section 9760(1) Requires Credit to the New Sentence for Pre‑Sentence Custody on a Probation Detainer When the Detainer Is Based on the Same Conduct as the New Charge Commentary on Commonwealth v....
Conduct-Based Time Credit Under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9760(1): Pre‑Sentence Custody on a Probation Detainer Triggered by New‑Charge Conduct Must Be Credited to the New Sentence

Conduct-Based Time Credit Under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9760(1): Pre‑Sentence Custody on a Probation Detainer Triggered by New‑Charge Conduct Must Be Credited to the New Sentence

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Conduct-Based Time Credit Under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9760(1): Pre‑Sentence Custody on a Probation Detainer Triggered by New‑Charge Conduct Must Be Credited to the New Sentence Case: Commonwealth v. Phillips,...
Commonwealth v. Lewis: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Retains “High‑Crime Area” as a Terry Factor, Offers Non‑Mandatory Guideposts; Justice Wecht Urges Its Abandonment Under Article I, Section 8

Commonwealth v. Lewis: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Retains “High‑Crime Area” as a Terry Factor, Offers Non‑Mandatory Guideposts; Justice Wecht Urges Its Abandonment Under Article I, Section 8

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Commonwealth v. Lewis: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Retains “High‑Crime Area” as a Terry Factor, Offers Non‑Mandatory Guideposts; Justice Wecht Urges Its Abandonment Under Article I, Section 8 Court:...
Post-Strunk Application of §6318: Verbal Pre‑Assault Commands as “Communication” — Justice Mundy’s Concurrence/Dissent in Commonwealth v. Smith (Pa. 2025)

Post-Strunk Application of §6318: Verbal Pre‑Assault Commands as “Communication” — Justice Mundy’s Concurrence/Dissent in Commonwealth v. Smith (Pa. 2025)

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Post-Strunk Application of §6318: Verbal Pre‑Assault Commands as “Communication” — Justice Mundy’s Concurrence/Dissent in Commonwealth v. Smith (Pa. 2025) Introduction This commentary examines...
Post-Strunk Application of 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318: Verbal Commands as “Communication” for Unlawful Contact with a Minor — Justice Mundy’s Concurrence/Dissent in Commonwealth v. Smith

Post-Strunk Application of 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318: Verbal Commands as “Communication” for Unlawful Contact with a Minor — Justice Mundy’s Concurrence/Dissent in Commonwealth v. Smith

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Post-Strunk Application of 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318: Verbal Commands as “Communication” for Unlawful Contact with a Minor — Justice Mundy’s Concurrence/Dissent in Commonwealth v. Smith Introduction In...
Context Over Text: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds DOH’s Two‑Lab Testing Rule Under the Medical Marijuana Act (Wecht, J., dissenting)

Context Over Text: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds DOH’s Two‑Lab Testing Rule Under the Medical Marijuana Act (Wecht, J., dissenting)

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Context Over Text: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds DOH’s Two‑Lab Testing Rule Under the Medical Marijuana Act (Wecht, J., dissenting) Introduction In Green Analytics North, LLC v. Department of...
Limiting “Other Person Under the Tenant’s Control” to the Initial Invitation Onto the Premises: Justice Wecht’s Dissent in Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh v. Nash

Limiting “Other Person Under the Tenant’s Control” to the Initial Invitation Onto the Premises: Justice Wecht’s Dissent in Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh v. Nash

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Limiting “Other Person Under the Tenant’s Control” to the Initial Invitation Onto the Premises: Justice Wecht’s Dissent in Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh v. Nash Introduction This...
On‑Bill Billing and the Limits of Section 1502: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds Non‑Electric Add‑Ons Fall Outside “Service”; Scope of “All Electric Services” Reserved

On‑Bill Billing and the Limits of Section 1502: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds Non‑Electric Add‑Ons Fall Outside “Service”; Scope of “All Electric Services” Reserved

Date: Sep 27, 2025
On‑Bill Billing and the Limits of Section 1502: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds Non‑Electric Add‑Ons Fall Outside “Service”; Scope of “All Electric Services” Reserved Introduction In Interstate Gas...
Uniformity in Effect, Not Form: Denial of Local Tax Credits to Nonresidents Renders Pittsburgh’s Facility Fee Unconstitutional under Pennsylvania’s Uniformity Clause

Uniformity in Effect, Not Form: Denial of Local Tax Credits to Nonresidents Renders Pittsburgh’s Facility Fee Unconstitutional under Pennsylvania’s Uniformity Clause

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Uniformity in Effect, Not Form: Denial of Local Tax Credits to Nonresidents Renders Pittsburgh’s Facility Fee Unconstitutional under Pennsylvania’s Uniformity Clause Introduction In National Hockey...
Tranter v. Z&D Tour: Pennsylvania High Court Rejects “Key Witness” Requirement and Articulates a 100‑Mile Benchmark in Forum Non Conveniens Analysis

Tranter v. Z&D Tour: Pennsylvania High Court Rejects “Key Witness” Requirement and Articulates a 100‑Mile Benchmark in Forum Non Conveniens Analysis

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Tranter v. Z&D Tour: Pennsylvania High Court Rejects “Key Witness” Requirement and Articulates a 100‑Mile Benchmark in Forum Non Conveniens Analysis Introduction In a set of consolidated appeals...
SURE-Based Email Notifications and Accurate Coding as Pennsylvania’s Minimum Statewide Process for Defective Mail‑In Ballots

SURE-Based Email Notifications and Accurate Coding as Pennsylvania’s Minimum Statewide Process for Defective Mail‑In Ballots

Date: Sep 27, 2025
SURE-Based Email Notifications and Accurate Coding as Pennsylvania’s Minimum Statewide Process for Defective Mail‑In Ballots Introduction In Center for Coalfield Justice v. Washington County Board of...
Human Oversight and Secured-Only Systems: Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Interim Framework for Judicial Use of Generative AI

Human Oversight and Secured-Only Systems: Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Interim Framework for Judicial Use of Generative AI

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Human Oversight and Secured-Only Systems: Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Interim Framework for Judicial Use of Generative AI Introduction On September 9, 2025, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania issued...
“Written-Consent Rule” for Reinstated Bail:  Commonwealth v. Rondon (Pa. 2025)

“Written-Consent Rule” for Reinstated Bail: Commonwealth v. Rondon (Pa. 2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Written-Consent Rule” for Reinstated Bail Commonwealth v. Rondon, 294 A.3d ___ (Pa. 2025) 1. Introduction Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (Middle District) — Decided 19 Aug 2025 Majority: McCaffery,...
Commonwealth v. Walker (2025): Re-defining the Limits of Voir Dire Questions on Legal Principles in Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Walker (2025): Re-defining the Limits of Voir Dire Questions on Legal Principles in Pennsylvania

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Commonwealth v. Walker (Pa. 2025): Re-defining the Limits of Voir Dire Questions on Legal Principles Introduction In Commonwealth v. Walker, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania—Western...
“No Unity Destroyed, No Severance Achieved” – The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Self-Conveyance as a Means of Terminating Joint Tenancy

“No Unity Destroyed, No Severance Achieved” – The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Self-Conveyance as a Means of Terminating Joint Tenancy

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“No Unity Destroyed, No Severance Achieved” – The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Self-Conveyance as a Means of Terminating Joint Tenancy 1. Introduction Grant v. Grant (Pa. 2025) tackles a...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert